Washington: 127th best strength of schedule.
127th.
Put them in, and your system is effectively dead.
127th.
Put them in, and your system is effectively dead.
Guns being his normal "King of the Village of the Idiots" selfWhere are you getting the strength of schedule data?
Guns being his normal "King of the Village of the Idiots" self
His "SOS" references are to UW's OOC "SOS".......ie, THREE of the 13 games they played
By most metrics, their full season "SOS" typically falls in somewhere near the middle of the pack - - - 5Os or 60s nationwide
Of course, even at that, ALL so-called "SOS" claims are indeterminate and subjective measures .......and all depend on what parameters you put into your algorithm:
"Do you use opponents W/L %? If so, how heavily is it weighted?"
"Do you include weights for your opponents conference affiliations? If so, how do you calculate it, how do you weight it?"
"When ranking teams from different conferences, do you try to evaluate relative strength of conferences? If so, how do you do it?" (Probably the most impactful, and yet - by definition - most subjective component of any "SOS" measure........since 3/4 of everyone's games are played within their own little "cult")
Etc
Etc
Etc
ie - " Tell me who you want to see have the better "SOS", and I'll develop the algorithm to yield that result"
(and it will be a logically defensible algorithm)
Washington: 127th best strength of schedule.
127th.
Put them in, and your system is effectively dead.
As already made clear by others in this thread, 127 is their ooc sos.Their SOS isn't 127th. Typical you.