It sucked, yes. I've gotten over it. Rose Bowl and big things happening this season!
2/14: Jessie Keith, Survivor(?) of Jerry Sandusky’s abuse speaks out. Article & video
- Thread starter coveydidnt
- Start date
It sucked, yes. I've gotten over it. Rose Bowl and big things happening this season!
Usually I'd consider Trolling to be cheering Stuart Scott's death because he criticized Joe, but here it's considered a badge of honor.
Anybody remember that psu student in one of the Sandusky documentaries that was going off about the upcoming Nebraska game and the need to focus on the game instead of Sandusky right after the news broke in 2011? This poster reminds me of that flake.
If you're truly interested there's a thread for that ~> https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threa...in-2017-would-still-be-a-great-season.166285/
Nice deflection.
If you don't like the discussion, why are you involved in it?
If you moved on, why are you still in this thread calling people snowflakes?
the number of Free Jerry folks on this site is pretty small. You are painting with a very broad brush. So broad that it confirms my diagnosis: You're an idiot.
Will you condemn those who cheered Stuart Scott's death? Those who say Erin Andrews deserved to be spied on? I could go on, but do you demand better of fellow PSU fans? Or is it OK to act like Jackasses and act out because a coach got fired 5 years ago?
Why are you in this discussion if you don't like it?
Why does this thread concern you if you've "moved on"?
If you can't answer these two questions directly, you prove to all that either A) you're a retard or B) you're a troll.
Which is it?
bwifan
Well-Known Member
And yet you keep posting in this thread... If you don't like it simple... skip it. Or use the ignore button to block everyone annoying you. You are painting with a power wash, there are very few free Jerry people on here. You keep deflecting jim cummings points of skipping by this thread and throw stuart scott out there. So we will know if you are truly a troll and keep posting and deflecting here or simply just leave this thread and move on as your friends on the BOT have told you to do...
How about his latest strawman...:
Why can't he point us to all of these posts and posters proclaiming Jerry's innocence or his latest claims above???
Massive failures of PA Childcare and Child Protective Services Agencies which continue to endanger PA children - and misguided prosecutorial misconduct aimed at shielding and protecting "the State" due to the failures of these direct State Agencies and their agents - is not "the problem" (i.e., tyranny and corruption), but rather "them" and you "making excuses for them" -- whoever in the hell "them" is -- is the problem??? Classic! But troll-boy's highest concern here is "the child victims".......pathetic.
You're wasting your time. Troll boys highest concern is trolling and nothing else.
How does trashing the victims and calling them greedy liars help bring about reform to the Child Welfare System?
Here's an example of an argument that only you are making. And it's otherwise fictitious.
So all the posts bashing AM, AF, etc never happened? What about Ziggy rooting through the trash of one of the victims? That fictitious too?
I think he's gone far beyond just trolling.....I think he's gone to full-bore chumming the waters at this point.
I have never made excuses for them. I have largely ignored them. You would do well to follow my example, but you are simply too dim for that. Now I will ignore you, too.
Some of us with bigger than pea sized brains can mentally walk and chew gum at the same time. I realize that eliminates you, so walk...
What's your next name gonna be, pnnylion? How many times have you gotten banned?
How many times are you going to ignore simple questions?
You ignored my question. How is trashing Sandusky's victims going to help reform the Child Welfare System, which is what you guys claim to care about?
I can only speak for myself, but I'll admit it. I don't really care about reforming the Child Welfare System. If I'm being honest, I really don't. But I don't think there is anything wrong with trying to get to the bottom of the truth in this incident, and calling out bs claims when I see them. So when I see something like this Jesse Keith on the news with his obviously false story, and I see how it drags the school and everyone's name through the mud again, I'm going to speak out against it. Yes, ultimately I want Joe's good name to be restored. I don't think Jerry has to be innocent to do that. And I don't think there is anything wrong with my agenda. Since when is it wrong to seek the truth? I think even you can acknowledge that Joe got a raw deal in all of this, can't you?
Last edited:
I've already said what happened to Joe sucked. But for all the "urrrrghhh! College Kids and millenials are such sissies these days!" nonsense I hear from cranky old timers on this forum, they sure act like a coach getting fired was the biggest tragedy of the century. Kind of hypocritical, don't you say? It sucks but I've gotten over it a while ago.
I'm assuming you've reserved at least some outrage for this case.
http://www.mcall.com/news/local/whi...sic-teacher-investigation-20170214-story.html
Then while you're at it, would you please explain why one perpetrator is being charged with sexual assault, and the other with "inappropriate communication?"
It is actually a big issue if there is anyone making a false report. If any of the convictions were based on a false report and they are overturned, doubt is cast on the other allegations. The strength of the case against Sandusky was the number of victims that came out. The additional victims were identified in part due to the leaked grand jury report. The leaked grand jury report involves allegation of an unknown victim. Without the other reports the allegations against the unknown victim certainly aren't getting a guilty verdict. If a 1/3 of the victims or even one is found to be making a false allegation, it puts doubt on the other allegations. Anyone making a false allegation for whatever purpose should be called out on it. That kind of thing can hurt a case and is a huge disservice to real victims. The two that came out of the woodwork in the 70s and now this guy certainly make one skeptical. And if the judicial system didn't follow all legal procedures or took some shortcuts, they're in danger of letting a criminal walk. IF it is 35 out of 48, it is a very big deal outside of Jerry being in jail where he belongs. I don't think Jerry's anywhere close to innocent, but something sure does stink about the investigation, trial, etc.. I think that's what most people that are still paying close attention are concerned about. Motives are different such as the reputation of Penn State, Joe and the admin, but the stench about how things went down is what bothers us all.
Stuart Scott died on January 4, 2015. You signed up for this site September 30, 2016. This means one of several things.
1) You joined the site and went back and read every thread for the past 2 years, knowing you could somehow find some information to use in an argument in February 2017.
2) psulion2001 is but one of several accounts you have or have had on this site.
Feel free to show us the threads in which posters expressed glee with Mr. Scott's death. I notice you didn't express similar outrage at reporters and internet commenters who made fun of Joe's dying.
3) I read this board for years without signing up and decided to join in. Why was that so hard to think of?
Also, I absolutely was pissed when people celebrated Joe's death.
