One thing I didn't like was Nebraska being on Penn State's side. They should of been a #1 like the #3 overall.
One thing I didn't like was Nebraska being on Penn State's side. They should of been a #1 like the #3 overall.
One thing I didn't like was Nebraska being on Penn State's side. They should of been a #1 like the #3 overall.
I was talking to a guy at the game yesterday saying the same thing. He was actually on the committee that seeded the teams. I forget his name, but he’s from Iona. He said Nebraska’s loss to NIU (I believe that what’s he said) was a horrible non conference loss and did them in. Unlike football, they have a list of criteria for rankings and pretty much use that exclusively for seeding.
A totally excellent summary! ThanksIn the grand scheme, there are no easy opponents in the Final Four. If PSU were facing Stanford, or Florida in their semi, some PSU fans would be lamenting facing them, and grumbling that the other semi was easier. I think that's a mistake. At this point in the playoffs, all the teams are very good.
As for Nebraska being a 2 or 3 seed, I don't see how that would have happened. The final RPI was:
1. PSU
2. Florida
3. Kentucky
4. Texas
5. Stanford
6. Nebraska
7. Minnesota
8. Washington
9. Utah
10. Creighton
Let's look at records at the end of the season:
PSU: 29-1
Florida: 29-1
Kentucky: 26-3
Texas: 24-2
Stanford: 26-3
Nebraska: 26-4
Minny: 26-5
On the road, their records were:
PSU: 12-0
Florida: 9-0
Kentucky: 10-2
Texas: 11-1
Stanford: 13-1
Nebraska: 10-2
On neutral courts, their records were:
PSU: 5-0
Florida: 2-0
Kentucky: 3-0
Texas: 3-0
Stanford: 2-2
Nebraska: 1-2
So PSU got the #1 seed, Florida got the #2 seed, Stanford got the #3 seed, Kentucky got the #4 seed, Nebraska got the #5 seed, Texas got the #6 seed, Minny got the #7 seed, Washington got the #8 seed, etc.
Seeds 1, 2, and 3 held through the Regionals. #4 seed Kentucky fell to #5 seed, Nebraska, in the Regional Final. By seed, that would be the closest two seeds that would meet in the Regionals.
By being the #1 seed, PSU gets to face the lowest seed in a semifinal. The fact that it's the only team to have defeated PSU this season does give one pause, but it doesn't mean that the seeds were inaccurate.
During the season, Nebraska lost to Oregon, Florida, Northern Iowa, and Wisconsin. The Oregon and Florida loses were in August (the start of the season), the UNI loss was in mid-September, and the Wisky loss was in mid-October. The UNI loss was an odd one, in terms of the level of the competition, but Nebraska lost that 3-1, winning only the 3rd set.
Seeds aren't the end all and be all in a tournament. You can make an argument that the most dangerous team in the tournament was Southern Cal, the #10 seed. They defeated #7 seed Minnesota, 3-0, and darn near defeated #2 seed Florida in the Regional Final. They were up 2-1 in the Regional Final, and in set 4 they were up 21-18, and 24-23, before losing the 4th set. They were also were up 8-4, and 9-5 in the 5th set, before Florida went on a 10-2 run to win the set and the match.
Any of the four remaining teams has the talent to win the championship. PSU appears to have more firepower on their front line than does Nebraska, but it's not a big advantage. What worries me most about Nebraska is that their first pass may have been the most consistent I saw in the Regional competition. They were consistently very accurate with their first pass, which enabled their setter to comfortably set up kill shots by the OHs or MBs. By comparison, PSU, Stanford, and Florida each seemed to have certain rotations where they were having some trouble with the first pass. Sometimes in competitions where the talent level is so close, it's little things like consistently accurate first passes that can make the different. But on the flip side, there are times where all the talent kind of neutralizes each other, but the elite player or players on one side make the difference.
I think Stanford will defeat Florida, but it wouldn't surprise me if Florida won that semi. In the PSU - Nebraska semi, the results of the earlier match do give me some concern, as does the consistency of Nebraska's first pass. I see that semi as a pick'em.
We should be treated to some great volleyball on Thursday evening. Hopefully PSU will advance to play on Saturday.
In regards to the losses. The first two losses of the year was bc our Setter did not play. She is our captain and Big Ten Setter of the Year.In the grand scheme, there are no easy opponents in the Final Four. If PSU were facing Stanford, or Florida in their semi, some PSU fans would be lamenting facing them, and grumbling that the other semi was easier. I think that's a mistake. At this point in the playoffs, all the teams are very good.
As for Nebraska being a 2 or 3 seed, I don't see how that would have happened. The final RPI was:
1. PSU
2. Florida
3. Kentucky
4. Texas
5. Stanford
6. Nebraska
7. Minnesota
8. Washington
9. Utah
10. Creighton
Let's look at records at the end of the season:
PSU: 29-1
Florida: 29-1
Kentucky: 26-3
Texas: 24-2
Stanford: 26-3
Nebraska: 26-4
Minny: 26-5
On the road, their records were:
PSU: 12-0
Florida: 9-0
Kentucky: 10-2
Texas: 11-1
Stanford: 13-1
Nebraska: 10-2
On neutral courts, their records were:
PSU: 5-0
Florida: 2-0
Kentucky: 3-0
Texas: 3-0
Stanford: 2-2
Nebraska: 1-2
So PSU got the #1 seed, Florida got the #2 seed, Stanford got the #3 seed, Kentucky got the #4 seed, Nebraska got the #5 seed, Texas got the #6 seed, Minny got the #7 seed, Washington got the #8 seed, etc.
Seeds 1, 2, and 3 held through the Regionals. #4 seed Kentucky fell to #5 seed, Nebraska, in the Regional Final. By seed, that would be the closest two seeds that would meet in the Regionals.
By being the #1 seed, PSU gets to face the lowest seed in a semifinal. The fact that it's the only team to have defeated PSU this season does give one pause, but it doesn't mean that the seeds were inaccurate.
During the season, Nebraska lost to Oregon, Florida, Northern Iowa, and Wisconsin. The Oregon and Florida loses were in August (the start of the season), the UNI loss was in mid-September, and the Wisky loss was in mid-October. The UNI loss was an odd one, in terms of the level of the competition, but Nebraska lost that 3-1, winning only the 3rd set.
Seeds aren't the end all and be all in a tournament. You can make an argument that the most dangerous team in the tournament was Southern Cal, the #10 seed. They defeated #7 seed Minnesota, 3-0, and darn near defeated #2 seed Florida in the Regional Final. They were up 2-1 in the Regional Final, and in set 4 they were up 21-18, and 24-23, before losing the 4th set. They were also were up 8-4, and 9-5 in the 5th set, before Florida went on a 10-2 run to win the set and the match.
Any of the four remaining teams has the talent to win the championship. PSU appears to have more firepower on their front line than does Nebraska, but it's not a big advantage. What worries me most about Nebraska is that their first pass may have been the most consistent I saw in the Regional competition. They were consistently very accurate with their first pass, which enabled their setter to comfortably set up kill shots by the OHs or MBs. By comparison, PSU, Stanford, and Florida each seemed to have certain rotations where they were having some trouble with the first pass. Sometimes in competitions where the talent level is so close, it's little things like consistently accurate first passes that can make the different. But on the flip side, there are times where all the talent kind of neutralizes each other, but the elite player or players on one side make the difference.
I think Stanford will defeat Florida, but it wouldn't surprise me if Florida won that semi. In the PSU - Nebraska semi, the results of the earlier match do give me some concern, as does the consistency of Nebraska's first pass. I see that semi as a pick'em.
We should be treated to some great volleyball on Thursday evening. Hopefully PSU will advance to play on Saturday.
Yep. Passing will be huge. Look for Nebraska to target Simone all night.I have watched a lot of volleyball (daughter played D-1 for a few years). The first pass is critical at this level. There are two aspects of the game that affect the first pass: the quality of the back row players and the degree of difficulty of the serve. A good serving team can get the opponent "out of system" and scrambling on that first pass, making life difficult for the setter and creating problems running the offense. During the match watch how much the setter has to move to retrieve the pass. That will be a barometer as to how well the team is playing. Nebraska's setter may be the best remaining setter in the Final Four. PSU has to serve to spots and serve tough to prevail.
Yep. Passing will be huge. Look for Nebraska to target Simone all night.
Just checked the line and both teams are -120, so a toss-up. Should be a great match.
You don't need guys in Vegas to tell you that.
Honestly, I would have expected PSU to be a bit of a favorite, so it did surprise me.
Thanks Tom for the links.VolleyMob