Maybe in PA. In Indiana it’s “State”. One class, one tournament. You have multiple classes/tournaments, so “ States” is appropriate. 😁Judging by the title of the thread, I assume we can put the long time argument to rest. It is officially "states" and not "state" tournament.![]()
Indians? The Rez? LolMaybe in PA. In Indians it’s “State”. One class, one tournament. You have multiple classes/tournaments, so “ States” is appropriate. 😁
Maybe in PA. In Indians it’s “State”. One class, one tournament. You have multiple classes/tournaments, so “ States” is appropriate. 😁
That's if your unit of measure is "tournaments." I think for most Pennsylvanians I know, the unit of measure is probably "weight classes" or "brackets".Maybe in PA. In Indians it’s “State”. One class, one tournament. You have multiple classes/tournaments, so “ States” is appropriate. 😁
Maybe in PA. In Indiana it’s “State”. One class, one tournament. You have multiple classes/tournaments, so “ States” is appropriate. 😁
So how can all these Russians compete in the Olympics when their country is not aloud to? Plus was Japan not at these WC's?
[/QUOTE
Individuals can still participate.
If we can solve this mystery and come together on this issue, I think world peace is just around the corner.That's if your unit of measure is "tournaments." I think for most Pennsylvanians I know, the unit of measure is probably "weight classes" or "brackets".
A new Loew! Just when “could of” gets stale, we are aloud a new donzerly light. Boneappletea!So how can all these Russians compete in the Olympics when their country is not aloud to? Plus was Japan not at these WC's?