ADVERTISEMENT

A look at: Wisconsin, Wisconsin, Wisconsin..........

bjf1991

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2016
4,790
5,257
1
PSU/Wisky

After taking a look at Wisky, I’m not going to predict a PSU landslide win……..but – if PSU is relatively healthy – I wouldn’t write off the possibility.

Last week, Minnesota absolutely outplayed Wisconsin – in Madison – until “Bad Mitch Leidner” showed up in the 2nd half (“awful” doesn’t even begin to describe his second half play)

Minnesota absolutely had Wisky on the ropes – and would most certainly have beaten them if not for “Bad Mitch”

That said, Minnesota is a very bad team to use to get a “scout” on Wisconsin…..since they are so very different from PSU on both sides of the ball……so I took a look at some earlier games – paying the most attention to Northwestern and OSU – who both have a lot of similarities in style to PSU.

After doing so, while its kind of hard to watch Wisconsin and think “10-2” team….they do present problems, and do a couple of things that are fairly unique, and will be a real challenge for PSU.

___________________________

Clearly, their strength is on the defensive side of the ball.

Defensively, when they play against teams with similar styles to PSU, their base is a 3-4 with two high safeties (against Minnesota, on the other hand - it was 8, sometimes 9 or 10 in the box - depending on formation - on a regular basis)……..but after that, there is all kinds of stuff going on.

Their down guys look like big Linebackers, and their Linebackers look like small down guys….and the seven of them end up all over the damn place. They show all sorts of fronts, changing snap-to-snap, and it is really hard just to figure out who in the hell to block - - - - that could make things tough for the green PSU offensive line.

Wisky will play with 3 guys down, or 4 guys, or 2 guys down….and five guys in two-point stances roaming around. Sometimes 4 man fronts, sometimes 5, sometimes 3 - - - - you just never know. Except against run-heavy teams (aka Minnesota) they don’t often bring an eighth man in the box – but finding the right guys to block out of the seven is tough - - - and it is really tough to get to the second level guys – they are big physical dudes who all move reasonably well.

Their best pass-rush guy is Watt (JJ’s little brother) - who is technically a LBer, lines up at ILB, OLB, or on the line (as mentioned earlier, you never know where the hell the are going to be)….and they don’t blitz with more than 4 a lot. But they are very effective in their pass rush because they may only bring 4 – but you never know which four (kind of a “Pittsburgh Steelers” type of system). All those moving parts make them VERY effective when they get you into 3rd down.

The secondary does look to be “exposable”. They do seem to like to play a lot of zone – but will switch things up on occasion. None of their DBs seem to be very good in man coverage (#8 is probably the best of the bunch), and you can also squeeze plays in to the outside seams away from their safeties…….their DBs (especially the safeties) seem to be really smart, well-coached guys - who make up for lack of elite athleticism with good skills and smarts - especially reacting to the ball out of their zone coverages, and they get their hands on a lot of passes (especially the safeties). I would guess they have more pickoffs than anyone we have played this year (but they have also faced some horrendous passers)

If PSU’s young OL can recognize, communicate, and execute their assignments against all of the Wisky looks and fronts (easier said than done), and if JoeMo can continue to do a wonderful job of getting the offense into the right sets with the “check with me” system, I do think the PSU skill guys could have a pretty nice day.

_________________


Offensively, their scheme is very similar to their defense – a TON of different formations and motions. This – I think – will be a very interesting tactical match-up for Brent Pry. Does he lay back a bit, and try to make sure they react properly to all of the various Wisky sets….or does he say “Screw it…let’s turn the tables on them” and show all the various looks that PSU likes to go to – and try to make Wisky react to them. Will be interesting to see how that plays out.

2016 Wisky – as opposed to their traditionally good teams – has NOT been overly or consistently effective with their straight-ahead power inside/outside zone stuff…..and their run game has morphed throughout the season. For a while they went with a VERY heavy “pull” package – and pulled one or (more often) two guys into the strong part of the formation and tried to simply overwhelm the defense with numbers. This worked for a while, but defenses then seemed to catch on – Wisky went a couple games where they were running behind the “pullers” over 90% of the time – and defenses started to react very strongly to the “pull” and create penetration to shut down that scheme. Wisky has gone back and forth since then with more traditional power zone heavy schemes and pulling schemes - - - - but in neither case have they been as effective as the Wisky of old. They still use Clement (#6) as their primary ball-carrier, and he has been solid. But he is not particularly quick to the hole, and they have at times mixed in #7 (who I think is a freshman) who is a bit quicker and scarier with respect to getting to the hole and breaking off some longer runs. They give to the FB a LOT in short yardage (and they have two good ones)

Supposedly Hornibrook will be available (the other QB is Houston). Neither is a particularly impressive passer – though I felt Houston was the better of the two. In pass protection, the right side of their OL has been inconsistent. They lost their starting RT – and replaced him with a Freshman (who is as big as a mountain on two feet) who has struggled at times – but gotten better as he has played more.

On the outside, they have one scary dude - #11 – who is a lot like a slightly smaller version of OSU’s Curtis Samuel – he has some serious quickness - - - - - but he’s the only outside guy who scares you. They will also mix him into a misdirection run game – and he gets to the corner just like Samuel does. One of their best athletes is the TE #81 (Formaglia?) who looks like a small offensive tackle, but is really athletic. They will use him a lot - - - - for everything from little drop off screens, to every type of downfield route – and he is surprisingly effective.


Oh…..and the Wisky placekicker is VERY shaky (their starter has been out injured)…..and every game I looked at, there was at least one long PR/KR against – or a return that was “this close” to breaking big…. FWIW
 
Did you look at their game against Georgia State or was that too early and possibly not indicative of how they're playing now? I ask because Wisconsin really struggled against what one would think is an an inferior matchup and I wondered if there might be clues as to what gives them problems.

Also, let's hope that Penn State now has a handle on that fly sweep that gave them fits early in the season. I don't know if the teams that have tried it since just aren't as good or if the Lions have solved it but the Badgers have run it really well with Peavy and I guarantee that they'll try it several times on Saturday night.
 
PSU/Wisky

After taking a look at Wisky, I’m not going to predict a PSU landslide win……..but – if PSU is relatively healthy – I wouldn’t write off the possibility.

Last week, Minnesota absolutely outplayed Wisconsin – in Madison – until “Bad Mitch Leidner” showed up in the 2nd half (“awful” doesn’t even begin to describe his second half play)

Minnesota absolutely had Wisky on the ropes – and would most certainly have beaten them if not for “Bad Mitch”

That said, Minnesota is a very bad team to use to get a “scout” on Wisconsin…..since they are so very different from PSU on both sides of the ball……so I took a look at some earlier games – paying the most attention to Northwestern and OSU – who both have a lot of similarities in style to PSU.

After doing so, while its kind of hard to watch Wisconsin and think “10-2” team….they do present problems, and do a couple of things that are fairly unique, and will be a real challenge for PSU.

___________________________

Clearly, their strength is on the defensive side of the ball.

Defensively, when they play against teams with similar styles to PSU, their base is a 3-4 with two high safeties (against Minnesota, on the other hand - it was 8, sometimes 9 or 10 in the box - depending on formation - on a regular basis)……..but after that, there is all kinds of stuff going on.

Their down guys look like big Linebackers, and their Linebackers look like small down guys….and the seven of them end up all over the damn place. They show all sorts of fronts, changing snap-to-snap, and it is really hard just to figure out who in the hell to block - - - - that could make things tough for the green PSU offensive line.

Wisky will play with 3 guys down, or 4 guys, or 2 guys down….and five guys in two-point stances roaming around. Sometimes 4 man fronts, sometimes 5, sometimes 3 - - - - you just never know. Except against run-heavy teams (aka Minnesota) they don’t often bring an eighth man in the box – but finding the right guys to block out of the seven is tough - - - and it is really tough to get to the second level guys – they are big physical dudes who all move reasonably well.

Their best pass-rush guy is Watt (JJ’s little brother) - who is technically a LBer, lines up at ILB, OLB, or on the line (as mentioned earlier, you never know where the hell the are going to be)….and they don’t blitz with more than 4 a lot. But they are very effective in their pass rush because they may only bring 4 – but you never know which four (kind of a “Pittsburgh Steelers” type of system). All those moving parts make them VERY effective when they get you into 3rd down.

The secondary does look to be “exposable”. They do seem to like to play a lot of zone – but will switch things up on occasion. None of their DBs seem to be very good in man coverage (#8 is probably the best of the bunch), and you can also squeeze plays in to the outside seams away from their safeties…….their DBs (especially the safeties) seem to be really smart, well-coached guys - who make up for lack of elite athleticism with good skills and smarts - especially reacting to the ball out of their zone coverages, and they get their hands on a lot of passes (especially the safeties). I would guess they have more pickoffs than anyone we have played this year (but they have also faced some horrendous passers)

If PSU’s young OL can recognize, communicate, and execute their assignments against all of the Wisky looks and fronts (easier said than done), and if JoeMo can continue to do a wonderful job of getting the offense into the right sets with the “check with me” system, I do think the PSU skill guys could have a pretty nice day.

_________________


Offensively, their scheme is very similar to their defense – a TON of different formations and motions. This – I think – will be a very interesting tactical match-up for Brent Pry. Does he lay back a bit, and try to make sure they react properly to all of the various Wisky sets….or does he say “Screw it…let’s turn the tables on them” and show all the various looks that PSU likes to go to – and try to make Wisky react to them. Will be interesting to see how that plays out.

2016 Wisky – as opposed to their traditionally good teams – has NOT been overly or consistently effective with their straight-ahead power inside/outside zone stuff…..and their run game has morphed throughout the season. For a while they went with a VERY heavy “pull” package – and pulled one or (more often) two guys into the strong part of the formation and tried to simply overwhelm the defense with numbers. This worked for a while, but defenses then seemed to catch on – Wisky went a couple games where they were running behind the “pullers” over 90% of the time – and defenses started to react very strongly to the “pull” and create penetration to shut down that scheme. Wisky has gone back and forth since then with more traditional power zone heavy schemes and pulling schemes - - - - but in neither case have they been as effective as the Wisky of old. They still use Clement (#6) as their primary ball-carrier, and he has been solid. But he is not particularly quick to the hole, and they have at times mixed in #7 (who I think is a freshman) who is a bit quicker and scarier with respect to getting to the hole and breaking off some longer runs. They give to the FB a LOT in short yardage (and they have two good ones)

Supposedly Hornibrook will be available (the other QB is Houston). Neither is a particularly impressive passer – though I felt Houston was the better of the two. In pass protection, the right side of their OL has been inconsistent. They lost their starting RT – and replaced him with a Freshman (who is as big as a mountain on two feet) who has struggled at times – but gotten better as he has played more.

On the outside, they have one scary dude - #11 – who is a lot like a slightly smaller version of OSU’s Curtis Samuel – he has some serious quickness - - - - - but he’s the only outside guy who scares you. They will also mix him into a misdirection run game – and he gets to the corner just like Samuel does. One of their best athletes is the TE #81 (Formaglia?) who looks like a small offensive tackle, but is really athletic. They will use him a lot - - - - for everything from little drop off screens, to every type of downfield route – and he is surprisingly effective.


Oh…..and the Wisky placekicker is VERY shaky (their starter has been out injured)…..and every game I looked at, there was at least one long PR/KR against – or a return that was “this close” to breaking big…. FWIW
Going deep into the play clock works to Wisky's strength. They move at the last second and you can't figure out who to block. Going on quick counts does neutralize this somewhat as long as your guys can figure out who to block. I expect JoMo to work the edges with the pass game and Gisecki. Looks like almost 7-8 lbers playing against you. We should be able to exploit them in the pass game.
 
Another quick question: do you think that the high number of picks that Wisconsin gets come from their getting pressure on the QB or do you think that their secondary are strong in man coverage? Or both? Or neither (e.g., backers drop well in zone)?
 
Another quick question: do you think that the high number of picks that Wisconsin gets come from their getting pressure on the QB or do you think that their secondary are strong in man coverage? Or both? Or neither (e.g., backers drop well in zone)?
They are very good at pressuring the pocket....and that's a BIG part of it.

They don't like to play a lot of man - from what I saw - and I don't think they have particularly good man cover guys (not that they are "bad" cover guys, and they are not afraid to play man......I just don't think that is either their strength, or what they really prefer to do).
Like most teams, they get most of their picks when they are sitting back in zone, and getting pressure up front.

Their safeties (#14 and #19) do a real nice job sitting back, diagnosing plays quickly, and making their breaks on passes. The corners have also made their share of picks (Shelton is probably the best of that bunch)


If there was one word to describe their defense, I'd say "smart" (really smart, actually)

"Smart " defenders tend to play very well in zone - - - where there is as much reliance coordination of the entire back 7, and on "reading" of what is going on in front of you, as their is reliance on pure athleticism to "lock down" on receivers (like you'd have in pure man schemes)

They do a ton of stuff with their front seven, and a lot with their back guys as well......and they rarely seem to be caught not knowing what they are doing.
Imagine a defense that did all the stuff that John Butler's defense tried to do in his one year as DC at PSU......except that - in the case of Wisconsin, as opposed to the Butler Defense - all 11 guys seem to be playing the same defense, and knowing what each other is doing, on any particular play :)

I'd guess Wisconsin has a pretty good defensive coaching staff.

(I think this will be a hell of a chess match between their guy, and Moorhead.....just hope that PSU can cobble together some decent OL play - so that Moorhead doesn't have both hands tied behind his back)


One other comment wrt their bountiful interception numbers:


They have played a handful of "pick machine" QBs (a couple who are truly awful):

- The kid from LSU (before he got benched?)
- OConnor from MSU (who threw as many to the Wisky defense as he did his own guys in that game)
- Tommy Armstrong
- The kid from Illinois (who was a train wreck)
- Blough from Purdue
and, of course,
- Mitch Leidner

Those guys are ALL ideal QBs to pad your interception stats against.

So.....not to discount a real good defense - because UW is that......but the pick numbers are very much enhanced with playing some real turnover generating QBs
 
Good analysis. I would just add a couple thoughts from a UW perspective.

Bad Mitch certainly showed up but a lot of that had to do with the UW defense. It all changed for him when our 350 lb NT broke through and destroyed him on the first series of the second half. He was never comfortable again after that play. Minnesota got no first downs on their last 6 series of the game. The Badger front just took over.

Speaking of that NT (Olive Sagapolu) he went out in the second half against OSU (right about the time they started having some success moving the ball after doing nothing all game, go figure), and had been out until the Goofer game. Him and Beigel (arguably 2 of 3 best defenders) hadn't played together since the third game. He gives our D a lot more flexibility, especially against the run. We had been starting a 295 lb DE at NT in Sheehy, who played well but isn't nearly the same presence as Olive. When Sags is demanding double teams it frees up our LBs and gives them 1-on-1 opportunities in the pass rush.

Shelton is a very good man corner but Tindal and Jamerson/Figaro really struggle, especially with double moves. I would expect safety help over the top to their side whenever we run man. UW leads the nation with 21 ints and has only given up 8 passing TDs all season. Most of that comes from the pass rush, but the secondary is pretty good in their own rights.

Definitely want to attack the sideline routes and quick hitters outside against this D. Georgia St had the most success against us in the passing game by drinking and dunking (and the fact that they were Georgia St and we were playing them before facing 4 straight teams that were in the top 10 at some point this year). If Trace can get the ball out in 2 seconds or less and on target you will have some success against this D.

I have quite a few more but this is fine for now, the week is still young.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bjf1991
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT