ADVERTISEMENT

Auditor General Eugene DePasquale announced the start of an audit of The Pennsylvania State Universi

step.eng69

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2012
12,791
14,878
1
North East PA, Backmountain area, age 75
WTF...excuse the language, but after the Kathleen debacle, I'm concerned this is just another façade. Is the Auditor General excluding the fiduciary responsibilities of the BOT? or did I read the article wrong and the audit will include the handling of the gifts to the accusers.

Auditor General DePasquale Starts Audit of Penn State University
Will review university’s follow up to child abuse scandal, governance changes, control of tuition hikes


HARRISBURG (Aug. 16, 2016) – Auditor General Eugene DePasquale today announced the start of an audit of The Pennsylvania State University that will review — among other things — the university’s reforms since the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, governance changes, and efforts to control tuition hikes.

“Nearly five years have passed since the news broke about Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children,” DePasquale said. “Through this audit, we will test the university’s implementation of new policies and procedures intended to prevent sexual, physical, or emotional abuse.”

Specifically, DePasquale said auditors will review the extent to which Penn State has implemented recommendations of a November 2012 Department of the Auditor General’s special report on governance reform in wake of the child sexual abuse scandal. Auditors also will determine if the university complies with all requirements for state and federal background checks for employees and others affiliated with the university.

The audit will also evaluate how the university responded to the report’s recommendations regarding the structure and function of the board of trustees’ governance related to transparency and accountability.

“We also will look at how Penn State complies with the federal and state laws relating to sexual violence prevention and response, sexual assault prevention, dating violence education and the protection of minors,” DePasquale said. “A university campus should be a safe place for all.”

He said auditors will also review any efforts by Penn State to control costs and hold the line on tuition increases.

“Parents and students at Penn State, and all college and universities for that matter, are grappling with how to pay for higher education,” DePasquale said. “Controlling spending is key to keeping tuition costs reigned in, and such expenditure monitoring is especially important for a taxpayer-supported institution such as Penn State.”

The audit will cover Jan. 1, 2013 through the end of audit procedures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
How are the implementation of those meaningless "reforms" related to Sandusky adding to the costs of the university and how much of that cost is ultimately passed to the students?

How does psu implementing "reforms" stop kids from around the commonwealth from getting molested? Where is the audit of state law enforcement and CYS and DPW?
 
Can't do everything. I'll be interested to see his findings on cost control. And, BTW, proer usage is "reined", not "reigned."
 
WTF...excuse the language, but after the Kathleen debacle, I'm concerned this is just another façade. Is the Auditor General excluding the fiduciary responsibilities of the BOT? or did I read the article wrong and the audit will include the handling of the gifts to the accusers.

Auditor General DePasquale Starts Audit of Penn State University
Will review university’s follow up to child abuse scandal, governance changes, control of tuition hikes


HARRISBURG (Aug. 16, 2016) – Auditor General Eugene DePasquale today announced the start of an audit of The Pennsylvania State University that will review — among other things — the university’s reforms since the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, governance changes, and efforts to control tuition hikes.

“Nearly five years have passed since the news broke about Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children,” DePasquale said. “Through this audit, we will test the university’s implementation of new policies and procedures intended to prevent sexual, physical, or emotional abuse.”

Specifically, DePasquale said auditors will review the extent to which Penn State has implemented recommendations of a November 2012 Department of the Auditor General’s special report on governance reform in wake of the child sexual abuse scandal. Auditors also will determine if the university complies with all requirements for state and federal background checks for employees and others affiliated with the university.

The audit will also evaluate how the university responded to the report’s recommendations regarding the structure and function of the board of trustees’ governance related to transparency and accountability.

“We also will look at how Penn State complies with the federal and state laws relating to sexual violence prevention and response, sexual assault prevention, dating violence education and the protection of minors,” DePasquale said. “A university campus should be a safe place for all.”

He said auditors will also review any efforts by Penn State to control costs and hold the line on tuition increases.

“Parents and students at Penn State, and all college and universities for that matter, are grappling with how to pay for higher education,” DePasquale said. “Controlling spending is key to keeping tuition costs reigned in, and such expenditure monitoring is especially important for a taxpayer-supported institution such as Penn State.”

The audit will cover Jan. 1, 2013 through the end of audit procedures.
Conceivably, an actual INVESTIGATIVE AUDIT into spending and budgetary items - by someone who is both competent and committed, and who is focused on proper fiduciary conduct - could be useful.


My expectation is that this will NOT be an Investigative Audit by someone who is both competent and committed, and who is focused on proper fiduciary conduct.
(In fact, I'd probably lay pretty long odds against it)

If my "expectations" prove to be correct, the only impact that this "effort" will have wrt the mission of establishing proper governance of the University will not be anything positive.....and could be negative - since post-audit the impression is given that there is "nothing to see here", since it has now been "looked at".

Hopefully I am wrong.......but it smells like SS DD
 
WTF...excuse the language, but after the Kathleen debacle, I'm concerned this is just another façade. Is the Auditor General excluding the fiduciary responsibilities of the BOT? or did I read the article wrong and the audit will include the handling of the gifts to the accusers.

Auditor General DePasquale Starts Audit of Penn State University
Will review university’s follow up to child abuse scandal, governance changes, control of tuition hikes


HARRISBURG (Aug. 16, 2016) – Auditor General Eugene DePasquale today announced the start of an audit of The Pennsylvania State University that will review — among other things — the university’s reforms since the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, governance changes, and efforts to control tuition hikes.

“Nearly five years have passed since the news broke about Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children,” DePasquale said. “Through this audit, we will test the university’s implementation of new policies and procedures intended to prevent sexual, physical, or emotional abuse.”

Specifically, DePasquale said auditors will review the extent to which Penn State has implemented recommendations of a November 2012 Department of the Auditor General’s special report on governance reform in wake of the child sexual abuse scandal. Auditors also will determine if the university complies with all requirements for state and federal background checks for employees and others affiliated with the university.

The audit will also evaluate how the university responded to the report’s recommendations regarding the structure and function of the board of trustees’ governance related to transparency and accountability.

“We also will look at how Penn State complies with the federal and state laws relating to sexual violence prevention and response, sexual assault prevention, dating violence education and the protection of minors,” DePasquale said. “A university campus should be a safe place for all.”

He said auditors will also review any efforts by Penn State to control costs and hold the line on tuition increases.

“Parents and students at Penn State, and all college and universities for that matter, are grappling with how to pay for higher education,” DePasquale said. “Controlling spending is key to keeping tuition costs reigned in, and such expenditure monitoring is especially important for a taxpayer-supported institution such as Penn State.”

The audit will cover Jan. 1, 2013 through the end of audit procedures.

Gee, let's hope it's not another "Whitewash" Report the corrupt in Pennsylvania Government have become famous for (i.e., Moulton's Investigation of AG Corbett's handling of the DPW-filed CSA Investigation.....Bruce Castor saying that he thinks TSM might have had something to do with Sandusky's access to kids.....DPW's 1998 Investigation and Report.....). These guys have applied more whitewash than Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn!
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
Although, if it's political BS, why do it at all? Nobody's asking for it but us.
 
Great opportunity to make the BOT accountable for gambling $93,000,000 on "insurance will cover it!"


I have a feeling he won't touch that area. It will likely be a win- win report for the auditor general and nothing else.

He will either say the university has yet to meet his 'important' guidelines for post JS (i.e. he cares more and the university still hasn't done enough) or the university is greatly protected now because they followed his guidelines to make everything safe now. Then he will put in some statement about how 'tuition is a national issue, everyone's trying, blah blah, penn state (like everyone) needs to address this issue better. Look how much I care. Thanks for coming to the press conference'.

What would be helpful to answering a lot of the bickering come budget time and issues of current BoT spending would be a top to bottom financial audit of the entire university. Then change policy and practices where needed to streamline the university and cut waste, address the giving away of $$ like water, address the spending of tuition and state money on JS issues with the fake 'internal loana' (despite saying they aren't using state/ tuition money), and recommendations for reducing tuition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StinkStankStunk
You mean they listen to us? Not likely.

My take on it is that it is BS, but DePasquale is going to do this and then turn it into his benefit. He probably knows he can nail people, so he'll dig up the dirt and then force the guilty parties to agree to offers they can't refuse, all to his benefit.
 
You mean they listen to us? Not likely.

My take on it is that it is BS, but DePasquale is going to do this and then turn it into his benefit. He probably knows he can nail people, so he'll dig up the dirt and then force the guilty parties to agree to offers they can't refuse, all to his benefit.

I hope you are right.......but I would be beyond shocked (can't even think of a word that could properly express the level of "unexpected" I would feel wrt that outcome)
 
Don't misread me. It's quite likely that nothing bad will come out. He will make them pay to keep their silence, somehow, and they'll have no choice but to comply, most likely.

If he wants to become governor, he can either blow this thing wide open for all to see, or else he can make backroom deals to make it happen by protecting the guilty. We'll see which path he chooses. There's no doubt in my mind that he's doing this to further his political ambitions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
First question to him (if we had reporters in the Commonwealth who had even the slightest backbone or independent thought) should be-

'If Penn State paid $8.5 million to Freeh for his recommendations on how to prevent this in the future leading to all the new PSU policies implemented (which is what BoT Chair Karen Peetz stated is all the BoT cared about in the Freeh report) - then why was the PA auditor general required to add new recommendations? Did Freeh's $8.5 million recommendations not address the issue completely or are you just trying to jump on the pile late?

As auditor general, what would you say about PSU paying $8.5 million for an incomplete report requiring you to have to spend state funds and intervene?

Don't you think this raises serious questions regarding PSU (esp BoT) fiduciary responsibility with regard to spending and competence (especially with tuition issues)?

What I'd give to be a reporter in Harrisburg now. ;)
 
Last edited:
Great opportunity to make the BOT accountable for gambling $93,000,000 of student tuition on "insurance will cover it!"
O.T. Glad you posted the 2014 article about tommy two timer. A good refresher on the type of person playing to the Penn State alumni voters...after all of the damage he caused.

“Tom Corbett: Penn State probably should not have fired Joe Paterno http://t.co/k89xVXL4q5 @GovernorCorbett w/ benefit of hindsight. #PSUBOT”
(30 minutes ago)
Twitter / ChiTownLionPSU
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
Gee, let's hope it's not another "Whitewash" Report the corrupt in Pennsylvania Government have become famous for (i.e., Moulton's Investigation of AG Corbett's handling of the DPW-filed CSA Investigation.....Bruce Castor saying that he thinks TSM might have had something to do with Sandusky's access to kids.....DPW's 1998 Investigation and Report.....). These guys have applied more whitewash than Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn!
You're wrong about Bruce Castor...
he stepped on a pebble and had a thought
th_NT33_BUNZ.jpg
 
Last edited:
You mean they listen to us? Not likely.

My take on it is that it is BS, but DePasquale is going to do this and then turn it into his benefit. He probably knows he can nail people, so he'll dig up the dirt and then force the guilty parties to agree to offers they can't refuse, all to his benefit.
He's going to have to nail in the low life of the feeding system, you know he can't touch the high life feeders, they are probably covered under the PA Politico Protection System.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
He is doing a report so he can talk to the BOT and let them know that without a sizable contribution to his next election campaign, the report will probably be very negative. This is nothing more than blackmailing PSU for political gain.
Eugene DePasquale last name ends in a vowel, doubt if he even knows where to begin with blackmailing. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
Don't be surprised if the phrase "football culture" gets a rerun in this audit report. It's Pennsylvania. The game is rigged. Politicians are just the actors on the stage, doing the bidding of unseen directors.
I'm sure it will WPA, the university’s reforms since the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, governance changes are being reviewed and the football culture was in the mix or am I mistaken?
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
When do you suppose the PA Auditor General will audit PA Child Protective Services agencies...you know, the same agencies that failed to recognize abuse when they were first contacted about Sandusky? These are the same people who named Second Mile as a de facto agency working for the state. The same organization that hid behind the large shadow cast by Penn State and then disappeared into the night quicker than a fart on a windy day.
 
Conceivably, an actual INVESTIGATIVE AUDIT into spending and budgetary items - by someone who is both competent and committed, and who is focused on proper fiduciary conduct - could be useful.


My expectation is that this will NOT be an Investigative Audit by someone who is both competent and committed, and who is focused on proper fiduciary conduct.
(In fact, I'd probably lay pretty long odds against it)

If my "expectations" prove to be correct, the only impact that this "effort" will have wrt the mission of establishing proper governance of the University will not be anything positive.....and could be negative - since post-audit the impression is given that there is "nothing to see here", since it has now been "looked at".

Hopefully I am wrong.......but it smells like SS DD
WTF...excuse the language, but after the Kathleen debacle, I'm concerned this is just another façade. Is the Auditor General excluding the fiduciary responsibilities of the BOT? or did I read the article wrong and the audit will include the handling of the gifts to the accusers.

Auditor General DePasquale Starts Audit of Penn State University
Will review university’s follow up to child abuse scandal, governance changes, control of tuition hikes


HARRISBURG (Aug. 16, 2016) – Auditor General Eugene DePasquale today announced the start of an audit of The Pennsylvania State University that will review — among other things — the university’s reforms since the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, governance changes, and efforts to control tuition hikes.

“Nearly five years have passed since the news broke about Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children,” DePasquale said. “Through this audit, we will test the university’s implementation of new policies and procedures intended to prevent sexual, physical, or emotional abuse.”

Specifically, DePasquale said auditors will review the extent to which Penn State has implemented recommendations of a November 2012 Department of the Auditor General’s special report on governance reform in wake of the child sexual abuse scandal. Auditors also will determine if the university complies with all requirements for state and federal background checks for employees and others affiliated with the university.

The audit will also evaluate how the university responded to the report’s recommendations regarding the structure and function of the board of trustees’ governance related to transparency and accountability.

“We also will look at how Penn State complies with the federal and state laws relating to sexual violence prevention and response, sexual assault prevention, dating violence education and the protection of minors,” DePasquale said. “A university campus should be a safe place for all.”

He said auditors will also review any efforts by Penn State to control costs and hold the line on tuition increases.

“Parents and students at Penn State, and all college and universities for that matter, are grappling with how to pay for higher education,” DePasquale said. “Controlling spending is key to keeping tuition costs reigned in, and such expenditure monitoring is especially important for a taxpayer-supported institution such as Penn State.”

The audit will cover Jan. 1, 2013 through the end of audit procedures.

Will Pasquale expect PSU to have implemented any recommendations from the Freeh Report? Why are the members of the BoT exempt from a background check? Why isn't the investigation focused on the unauthorized payout of millions of dollars in tax payer money by board members who illegally violated their fiduciary duty?
 
Can't do everything. I'll be interested to see his findings on cost control. And, BTW, proer usage is "reined", not "reigned."
When factoring YoY cost changes, I'm sure the 93million paid out will be included in the base period, thus reflecting astonishing YoY savings and those in charge gleaming from ear to ear.

Foghorn Leghorn said it best. "You can argue with me but you can't argue with Math. Two half nuthins' is a Whole Nuthin".
 
WTF...excuse the language, but after the Kathleen debacle, I'm concerned this is just another façade. Is the Auditor General excluding the fiduciary responsibilities of the BOT? or did I read the article wrong and the audit will include the handling of the gifts to the accusers.

Auditor General DePasquale Starts Audit of Penn State University
Will review university’s follow up to child abuse scandal, governance changes, control of tuition hikes


HARRISBURG (Aug. 16, 2016) – Auditor General Eugene DePasquale today announced the start of an audit of The Pennsylvania State University that will review — among other things — the university’s reforms since the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal, governance changes, and efforts to control tuition hikes.

“Nearly five years have passed since the news broke about Sandusky’s sexual abuse of children,” DePasquale said. “Through this audit, we will test the university’s implementation of new policies and procedures intended to prevent sexual, physical, or emotional abuse.”

Specifically, DePasquale said auditors will review the extent to which Penn State has implemented recommendations of a November 2012 Department of the Auditor General’s special report on governance reform in wake of the child sexual abuse scandal. Auditors also will determine if the university complies with all requirements for state and federal background checks for employees and others affiliated with the university.

The audit will also evaluate how the university responded to the report’s recommendations regarding the structure and function of the board of trustees’ governance related to transparency and accountability.

“We also will look at how Penn State complies with the federal and state laws relating to sexual violence prevention and response, sexual assault prevention, dating violence education and the protection of minors,” DePasquale said. “A university campus should be a safe place for all.”

He said auditors will also review any efforts by Penn State to control costs and hold the line on tuition increases.

“Parents and students at Penn State, and all college and universities for that matter, are grappling with how to pay for higher education,” DePasquale said. “Controlling spending is key to keeping tuition costs reigned in, and such expenditure monitoring is especially important for a taxpayer-supported institution such as Penn State.”

The audit will cover Jan. 1, 2013 through the end of audit procedures.
I thought Mitchell already did this? Why the need for more auditing?
 
First question to him (if we had reporters in the Commonwealth who had even the slightest backbone or independent thought) should be-

'If Penn State paid $8.5 million to Freeh for his recommendations on how to prevent this in the future leading to all the new PSU policies implemented (which is what BoT Chair Karen Peetz stated is all the BoT cared about in the Freeh report) - then why was the PA auditor general required to add new recommendations? Did Freeh's $8.5 million recommendations not address the issue completely or are you just trying to jump on the pile late?

As auditor general, what would you say about PSU paying $8.5 million for an incomplete report requiring you to have to spend state funds and intervene?

Don't you think this raises serious questions regarding PSU (esp BoT) fiduciary responsibility with regard to spending and competence (especially with tuition issues)?

What I'd give to be a reporter in Harrisburg now. ;)

Next question should be: Gee Mr. Auditor General, couldn't the several hundred million in legal fees, payments, etc... that the PSU BOT has pissed away without regard for the actual Beneficial Interests of PSU, a State-Founded, State-Funded, State-Sponsored Higher Education NPO, been used to reduce In-State Tuition for Pennsylvania Families or at least used to hold the line on tuition costs???
 
Last edited:
Bruce Castor is still doing his Laurel & Hardy routine regarding TSM.....I know this stands for something, but I can't remember exactly what......was it Triple Second Mile......no-no Three Second Mile.....no, nah that's not it....The Super Mile?......Oh, it'll come to me eventually..... What a bunch of scum-bucket pukes that run Pennsylvania - none more so than that narcissistic coward, Fake Corman, who stabbed his own constituents in the freaking back!!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT