Tall, long armed MLB like the college S turned MLB for the Bears. Went to college in NM. Him.Yeah, but he's like 6'5" 240 now. What do you think he'll be by the end of the year?
Lightbulb: Brian Urlacher
Last edited:
Tall, long armed MLB like the college S turned MLB for the Bears. Went to college in NM. Him.Yeah, but he's like 6'5" 240 now. What do you think he'll be by the end of the year?
I don’t recall him blitzing from the edge, positioned like LT was. Micah is very fast out of the blocks, first ten yards. IMO, he’d be a nightmare for the opposing OT and TE.
Who's 5'11" 220lbs? At the NFL combines, Sanders was 5'11" 211lbs. Just look at last year's stats for RBs. These are 4 of the top 5 leading rushers.
Darrrell Henderson 5'8" 208lbs. 214 carries, 1900 yards
Trayveon Williams 5'9" 206lbs. 252 carries, 1760 yards
Travis Etienne 5'10" 200lbs. 204 carries, 1650 yards
Eno Benjamin 5' 10" 200lbs 300 carries, 1640 yards
Parsons is 245 as well as a true Soph. I recall a LB at Alabama recently that went 250/255.I think he’s closer to 6’3” than 6’5”, though he’s got a long wingspan. I think you can have him up to around 250 or 255 very comfortably with his athleticism holding up carrying that weight.
More importantly, though, I think we’re only looking at him for three years. He’s a natural linebacker and it’s the position he played in high school. I think it’s more worthwhile to keep him at the position where he’s comfortable and get a few years of really high caliber linebacker play out of him and leveraging his unique length, size and athleticism versus spending that time trying to teach him a position he’s never played before. I think he’s an outside linebacker at the next level, anyway, even if he’s 250-260 pounds.
We need RBs that can excel when the line can't block, blows up or is called on in a 4th and 5 with the game on the line. Hey, maybe RR will shock the world with his OC growth and puts his mark on the 2019 version of the ............RPO. Nah!Agree PSU is inexperienced at RB, but if there is one position in college football that has shown the least learning curve, it is RB. If they can block, we could see strength at the position quickly.
I don't know what you're trying to argue here Knight. We know Slade's a player and there's good reason to expect he breaks out this year as a 2nd year player.
But, maybe I'm wrong, but just I don't think someone 5-9, 195 is a primary tailback in the B1G, not at the top tier. I think there's a really big difference between 5-9 195 and 5-11 220.
It's got to be tailback by committee and we don't know what the committee will be composed of, let alone what they can do. My money would be on Cain playing a lot because he's already shown how physical and strong he is.
I think that so many of the all time great TBs are 5-9, 5-10, 200lbs: Sweetness, Emmitt, Barry, and that is in the NFL. I think 5-10 200lb is still a perfect size.
all great points. Saquon, although we probably can't even begin to dream that lightening will strike twice, turned around the team is FR year. Although, for a true frosh, pass blocking and turnovers are typically still a challenge.
So, which of Sanders 31 carries or 6 receptions in 2017 convinced you that Miles could do it all?
Perhaps my post wasn't worded very well.You're overstating Saquon's impact on the team as a freshman. He missed a couple games mid-season with an injury and we ended the season on a 4 game losing streak. His immense talent was obvious but he most certainly did not "turn around the team" as a freshman.
Yeah he was being sent up the middle through a lot of traffic.I certainly hope so.
I agree that I don’t recall seeing him blitz much. When he did he seemed to run straight to the blocker and not disengage. I thought that would have been an area that he might have excelled at right off the bat with his defensive end experience.
Be delighted. You’re wrong.I believe in the fire hydrant tailback, for sure. I just don't think that's Slade's game. Just like I don't think Clifford is a running quarterback. If I'm wrong I couldn't be more delighted...
No.RB is probably the position where experience matters the least. You can usually tell immediately if the guy has it or not. It's not a position like the OL or DL where you see tremendous change in performance as they get older.
Be delighted. You’re wrong.
Too many negative vibes from you. I’ll bet 80% of Slade’s carries last year were between the tackles.I think I'll wait till I see Mr. Slade breaking tackles at Iowa City. Unless you have the power of clairvoyance.
Too many negative vibes from you. I’ll bet 80% of Slade’s carries last year were between the tackles.
TBoyer is a total downer.Are we really down on Slade?? Man, I think he's going to have a great year! The backfield is LOADED.
Galt in an interview said Clifford improved his time in the 4.5 range. Not sure if I believe that number but even if he runs 4.6, that’s plenty fast for this offense. I think your concerns are unfounded.I believe in the fire hydrant tailback, for sure. I just don't think that's Slade's game. Just like I don't think Clifford is a running quarterback. If I'm wrong I couldn't be more delighted...
AmongSeider has already said that RB will be by committee this season. His reasoning was that he thought Sanders broke down at points last season, leading to rather unproductive games.
Slade isn't just a scat back, please everyone take a chance to review his high school tape. He is a very solid runner between the tackles, not necessarily because of power, but because he has elite vision and anticipation - he finds the hole and gets through it quickly. You don't have to be Jerome Bettis to be a successful between-the-tackles runner.
Between Slade, Cain, and Brown I think we have a solid 3-headed monster - high end speed, quickness, and power. It will also be interesting to see if Ford works into the rotation joining the roster a bit behind the others on the depth chart.
Slade had 45 attempts for 257 yards last year. That is a total of 11 carries difference from Sanders before he started. Also Slade had 27 yards in the bowl game with very few carries. We will be more than fine.The ones in a major bowl in the second half versus Washington. His 25 rushes as a true freshman. His 6.8 YPC average going into 2018. Also, the KO returns since he was a true freshmen. His ability to pass block and not just run or catch. The fact that he was almost 6' and 220 lbs.
More worried about the OCGood stuff. I am not concerned about the defense. I am concerned about QB and RB...and to some extent, the OL. We have ample talent due to recruiting in recent years....however, until you do it, it isn't done. So my guess is we have a learning curve in the first half of the year complete with dumb turnovers, missed assignments, and sloppy play.
He was still fumbling as a junior.And in all fairness, neither Brown nor Slade are true freshman as Sanders was during his debut year with his fumbleitis. He also managed to have some good runs and play some good football between the fumble outbreaks.
He’s very long for a LB, as is Cam Brown. Smith obviously more muscle mass and better talent but both have body type more of DE.
He’s very long for a LB, as is Cam Brown. Smith obviously more muscle mass and better talent but both have body type more of DE.
That is a legitimate point. In my mind, the keys to a great season on offense are QB and LT. If Clifford is as good as the coaches think he is and, we finally get lucky and have a stud OL come in and perform at his projected high level, we could have a serious bad ass offense. Hamler was a top 5 freshman WR, Dotson was yellow light going into the season and ended up starting 4 games. Interestingly, 8 of his 13 catches went for 1st downs. Freiermuth had a great Frosh year and is already blocking like a seasoned TE. It's not asking much to have one or more of Shorter, George, Brown, Hipp, Carr, Chisena to step up this year.
Until proven otherwise on the field, I'm going to remain highly optimistic about this team.
I don't know what you're trying to argue here Knight. We know Slade's a player and there's good reason to expect he breaks out this year as a 2nd year player.
But, maybe I'm wrong, but just I don't think someone 5-9, 195 is a primary tailback in the B1G, not at the top tier. I think there's a really big difference between 5-9 195 and 5-11 220.
It's got to be tailback by committee and we don't know what the committee will be composed of, let alone what they can do. My money would be on Cain playing a lot because he's already shown how physical and strong he is.
Windsor being suspended cost us the game.We held UK under 300 yards total offense. Two turnovers and a special teams TD could have played a part
You may be under selling Toney. In less than half the snaps of Miller, he had 5 sacks and 7.5 tackles for loss. Now he'll be playing at 243lbs with, assumably, the same high end speed.