ADVERTISEMENT

Big Board Freshman

wrestleknownothing

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2024
418
1,455
1
As the lights begin to fade and flicker on Rivals, I thought I would do a little copy/paste action.

In response to my returning points thread, someone on 34andcounting asked what kind of points could a freshman be expected to score at the NCAA Tournament.

Using Willie's Big Board data I decided to take a look. One huge caveat is that the numbers below are fitted lines through some VERY noisy data.

80% of Success is Showing Up

The first thing I looked at was the odds of qualifying for the tournament based on BB rank. There are 12 years worth of graduating classes in the data (2013 - 2023) that have completed true freshman and redshirt freshman years. For these calcs I am including true freshmen and redshirt freshmen for each high school graduating year. For example, for 2022 grads I include 2023 true freshmen plus 2024 redshirt freshmen.


image.thumb.png.663dec605a6285d8b33d1fafd2edf362.png

  • 100% of #1 Big Boarders qualified for the tournament as either a true freshman or a redshirt freshman. These are your only sure things.
  • By the time you get to the #10 BB it is a 50/50 proposition whether they even qualify for the tournament, never mind score once they get there.
No Participation Points

But you can't just show up. Once a freshman makes the tournament they still need to score. Combining scoring with probability of making the tournament steepens the curve somewhat.

image.thumb.png.a04cfb87368862e95d35b7ceb03f9750.png

  • At almost 18 points per, #1 BB can be expected to score in the high teens in their freshmen year (true or redshirt).
  • But that is it. No other rank cracks double digits.
  • And by the time you get to the #10 ranked freshman recruit you are looking at about 4 points.
Bring in da' Noise, Bring in da' Funk

That really should be Mitchell Mesenbrink's walk out music.

Remember what I said about the noise in the data? Mesenbrink is the physical embodiment of that noise (and he was trained by the Master of Funk). As the #59 ranked wrestler in his class, the line above suggests he is good for about a half a point in his freshman year. Well, at 19.5 points he is what we would call an outlier. And the reason you should take this with a grain of salt.
 
As the lights begin to fade and flicker on Rivals, I thought I would do a little copy/paste action.

In response to my returning points thread, someone on 34andcounting asked what kind of points could a freshman be expected to score at the NCAA Tournament.

Using Willie's Big Board data I decided to take a look. One huge caveat is that the numbers below are fitted lines through some VERY noisy data.

80% of Success is Showing Up

The first thing I looked at was the odds of qualifying for the tournament based on BB rank. There are 12 years worth of graduating classes in the data (2013 - 2023) that have completed true freshman and redshirt freshman years. For these calcs I am including true freshmen and redshirt freshmen for each high school graduating year. For example, for 2022 grads I include 2023 true freshmen plus 2024 redshirt freshmen.


image.thumb.png.663dec605a6285d8b33d1fafd2edf362.png

  • 100% of #1 Big Boarders qualified for the tournament as either a true freshman or a redshirt freshman. These are your only sure things.
  • By the time you get to the #10 BB it is a 50/50 proposition whether they even qualify for the tournament, never mind score once they get there.
No Participation Points

But you can't just show up. Once a freshman makes the tournament they still need to score. Combining scoring with probability of making the tournament steepens the curve somewhat.

image.thumb.png.a04cfb87368862e95d35b7ceb03f9750.png

  • At almost 18 points per, #1 BB can be expected to score in the high teens in their freshmen year (true or redshirt).
  • But that is it. No other rank cracks double digits.
  • And by the time you get to the #10 ranked freshman recruit you are looking at about 4 points.
Bring in da' Noise, Bring in da' Funk

That really should be Mitchell Mesenbrink's walk out music.

Remember what I said about the noise in the data? Mesenbrink is the physical embodiment of that noise (and he was trained by the Master of Funk). As the #59 ranked wrestler in his class, the line above suggests he is good for about a half a point in his freshman year. Well, at 19.5 points he is what we would call an outlier. And the reason you should take this with a grain of salt.

Dude, I freakin love your work. The data analysis you do is dope af, but it's your narratives that really bring it to life. I dig the voice you put to the numbers.

I know you post a good bit on Intermat, but I hope you'll consider visiting us at BSD sometime next season. Would love to see you in the comments OR in your own fanposts.
 
Dude, I freakin love your work. The data analysis you do is dope af, but it's your narratives that really bring it to life. I dig the voice you put to the numbers.

I know you post a good bit on Intermat, but I hope you'll consider visiting us at BSD sometime next season. Would love to see you in the comments OR in your own fanposts.
Kind of you to say. I will take a look.
 
Great work... looks like the Big Board is a very good predictor of both qualifying and points averages over time. I would expect a neg exponential function and that is what I am seeing. How well did the data fit the curve? I assume there is variance at each position and the farther form #1 you are the variance probably gets larger... would be curious where that variance starts to reduce as I don't expect there are many #100 that qualify much less score points.
All in all Willie should hire you so he can use data like this to prove he is the best :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sullivan
Great work... looks like the Big Board is a very good predictor of both qualifying and points averages over time. I would expect a neg exponential function and that is what I am seeing. How well did the data fit the curve? I assume there is variance at each position and the farther form #1 you are the variance probably gets larger... would be curious where that variance starts to reduce as I don't expect there are many #100 that qualify much less score points.
All in all Willie should hire you so he can use data like this to prove he is the best :rolleyes:
The fit was decent in spite of the noise. R2 of 67. The fit was actually worst at #1 as it is the only rank that had 100% qualify, so it looks like the outlier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gpago and Sullivan
The fit was decent in spite of the noise. R2 of 67. The fit was actually worst at #1 as it is the only rank that had 100% qualify, so it looks like the outlier.
Wow fairly good R2 for what 11 data points per rank? I wonder if the variance can be explain by where they go? In other words does going to PSU bump your odds of qualifying and placing higher? Definitely low numbers so might have to group the rankings (1-5, 6-10 etc). My guess is there is a significant bump. Once again nice work!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT