I have still not seen him, or any other liberal, provide compelling evidence that either issue is a problem of any kind.
1) People are always going to have unequal incomes, generally based on their contributions and value to society. There is not a perfect correlation between income and value, of course, but it is reasonably correlated. Modern history has shown that attempts to levelize income have overwhelmingly resulted in increased human misery among that society.
2) The climate is always changing, and mankind has historically thrived most when the climate was warmer than it is today. Liberals have never provided a compelling case that increased temperature and CO2 would be a net detriment to mankind.
Maybe Brad isn't nearly as smart as he thinks he is. Maybe his anger comes from his awareness that he is sort of a dum-dum.
1) People are always going to have unequal incomes, generally based on their contributions and value to society. There is not a perfect correlation between income and value, of course, but it is reasonably correlated. Modern history has shown that attempts to levelize income have overwhelmingly resulted in increased human misery among that society.
2) The climate is always changing, and mankind has historically thrived most when the climate was warmer than it is today. Liberals have never provided a compelling case that increased temperature and CO2 would be a net detriment to mankind.
Maybe Brad isn't nearly as smart as he thinks he is. Maybe his anger comes from his awareness that he is sort of a dum-dum.
