NFL needs to suspend him if they care about player safety
Shazier should equally be fined for his uncalled, clearly illegal, beyond dangerous hit that tool a Bengal out of the game.
The hit on Bernard was a cheap shot. Shazier lowered the crown of his helmet into Bernard's facemask.You continue to show you don't understand the rules of football.. Bernard became a runner and the hit was legal. It was a nasty hit, but legal, but you wouldn't understand cause you don't know football.
Burfict was head hunting all night.
You continue to show you don't understand the rules of football.. Bernard became a runner and the hit was legal. It was a nasty hit, but legal, but you wouldn't understand cause you don't know football.
Burfict was head hunting all night.
The hit on Bernard was a cheap shot. Shazier lowered the crown of his helmet into Bernard's facemask.
Actually that is incorrect. Bernard was a runner and lowered his head bracing for impact. That hit was clean.The hit on Bernard was a cheap shot. Shazier lowered the crown of his helmet into Bernard's facemask.
I think it was a legal hit, and so did the refs, who I thought did their best to control this street fight.Spearing is not legal dip$hit - I already posted the rule once. HERE IT IS AGAIN. You're full of $hit and don't know what you're f'ing talking about, it is not a legal hit moron!
Even the retired official said it was legal.Spearing is not legal dip$hit - I already posted the rule once. HERE IT IS AGAIN. You're full of $hit and don't know what you're f'ing talking about, it is not a legal hit moron!
I respectfully disagree. I saw Shazier lower his head so that the crown of his helmet hit Bernard square in the facemask. He was face up on him and then lowered his head at the last second.Actually that is incorrect. Bernard was a runner and lowered his head bracing for impact. That hit was clean.
I respectfully disagree. I saw Shazier lower his head so that the crown of his helmet hit Bernard square in the facemask. He was face up on him and then lowered his head at the last second.
Uh, no. The CLEAR difference between the two plays is intent. Shazier was tackling a player who was facing him and, while he did hit him high with his helmet, did not intend to do so. Should it have been a penalty? Perhaps, but the officiating expert hired by the tv station did not think so. On the other hand, what Burfect did was intentional, unnecessary and gratuitous. It was certainly a penalty and warrants a suspension. Burfect, Pacman Jones and their ilk got what they deserved. Both should be given their outright release tomorrow. Shazier does not have a bad reputation. Burfect does, and it is well,deserved. I hope he never plays another down and spends the rest of his life dwelling on how he failed his team and (hopefully) ended his career. Too bad he is wealthy, because if it weren't for football he would be digging ditches.Shazier should equally be fined for his uncalled, clearly illegal, beyond dangerous hit that took a Bengal out of the game.
A hit can be both "legal" and dirty. Shazier knew exactly what he was doing. If Brown is mad at anyone it should be Shazier. He started the cheap shot battle and got Brown killed in retaliation.
Nope... Ive watched it several times. His shoulder contacted Bernard first.I respectfully disagree. I saw Shazier lower his head so that the crown of his helmet hit Bernard square in the facemask. He was face up on him and then lowered his head at the last second.
A hit can be both "legal" and dirty. Shazier knew exactly what he was doing. If Brown is mad at anyone it should be Shazier. He started the cheap shot battle and got Brown killed in retaliation.
It wasn't legal. He hit with the crown of his helmet. 100% illegal.You continue to show you don't understand the rules of football.. Bernard became a runner and the hit was legal. It was a nasty hit, but legal, but you wouldn't understand cause you don't know football.
Burfict was head hunting all night.
I agree 100% on Burfict. At what point do his teammates intervene? If I'm a teammate who gutted it out for 59 minutes only to see Burfict blow it with his loose cannon act, I'm pretty pissed at him. When do the teammates go to Marvin Lewis and say "enough is enough with this clown. Either he goes or we go".I think Shazier's hit was borderline, but if I recall correctly all of the announcers, including the rules "expert", thought it was a good no call. Burfict was clearly going for a kill shot not to mention he was instigating stuff all night and tried to take out Ben earlier in the season. The guy had the same kind of reputation at ASU, it's why part of the reason why he went from sure-fire 1st round pick to in drafted free agent. He is trash and I hope Goodell takes notice.
Uh, no. The CLEAR difference between the two plays is intent. Shazier was tackling a player who was facing him and, while he did hit him high with his helmet, did not intend to do so. Should it have been a penalty? Perhaps, but the officiating expert hired by the tv station did not think so. On the other hand, what Burfect did was intentional, unnecessary and gratuitous. It was certainly a penalty and warrants a suspension. Burfect, Pacman Jones and their ilk got what they deserved. Both should be given their outright release tomorrow. Shazier does not have a bad reputation. Burfect does, and it is well,deserved. I hope he never plays another down and spends the rest of his life dwelling on how he failed his team and (hopefully) ended his career. Too bad he is wealthy, because if it weren't for football he would be digging ditches.
I agree 100% on Burfict. At what point do his teammates intervene? If I'm a teammate who gutted it out for 59 minutes only to see Burfict blow it with his loose cannon act, I'm pretty pissed at him. When do the teammates go to Marvin Lewis and say "enough is enough with this clown. Either he goes or we go".
Pacman just tweeted an f bomb laced video of him trashing the refs. Nice.
Liked Munchaks PF.
Burfect should be suspended at least four games. Not sure what the refs were thinking leaving him in the game.,,.dud is a menace and an embarrassment to the NFL.
The Bengals were playing dirty and classless long before Shazier's hit. And if his hit was indeed dirty and legal, that's still a hell of a lot better than just a flat out kill shot. Shazier was at least making a play on the ball carrier. Burfict wanted to inflict damage.
Regardless, there's no excuse for a "cheap shot battle." This isn't baseball where retaliating by hitting a batter is likely to result in a bruise. Brown could have (and may have) suffered a serious concussion if not worse.
Your opinion has been noted, with 7 posts in this thread alone on this rant.Just as the Bengals player could have suffered severe injury from Shazier's ILLEGAL hit. In fact, the Bengals player laid on the field forever and then left the game and could not return. Shazier's hit was unquestionably both dirty and illegal under the ACTUAL RULES.
I don't know you, but you are wrong on your position on this. Was not an illegal hit, or it would have been called. Both announcers and the former NFL referee agreed...............No doubt about it, it was absolutely an illegal hit - textbook Personal Foul Spearing - and a clear cheap-shot. THE RULES couldn't be any more clear about it.