Yeah but we don't HAVE to jump them.Technically the Rosebowl can choose any big ten team if the champ isn’t available. I don’t think we jump OSU though
The Big Ten has a Big say in the Rose Bowl selection process. Unless OSU makes the playoffs, we are not making the Rose Bowl.Yeah but we don't HAVE to jump them.
I think this would be an interesting scenario if OSU gets in the CFP, and both the buckeyes and wolverines win round 1. Then they play for the NC and OSU wins the "revenge" matchup and takes the crown.
If USC loses, what two loss team should go ahead of OSU?If I am on the committee I don't want the possibility of "revenge" matchups. That settles nothing. OSU lost big time on its home turf. That settled the matter.
The committee should look for uncontested possibilities. OSU does not get in if they want a fair playoff.
Think about this. The OSU/Michigan game was like the first round of an expanded playoff. It should be over for the loser, especially when the loss was at home.
I agree. But it a repeat happened with bama and georgia. And IMO, if were to happen here, only reinforces the need for a playoff bracket to avoid it.If I am on the committee I don't want the possibility of "revenge" matchups. That settles nothing. OSU lost big time on its home turf. That settled the matter.
The committee should look for uncontested possibilities. OSU does not get in if they want a fair playoff.
Think about this. The OSU/Michigan game was like the first round of an expanded playoff. It should be over for the loser, especially when the loss was at home.
TCU losing would also likely do it and I think that is more likely to happen than USC losing.I think the only way they do is if USC loses the PAC 12 cc.
Provided Georgia,Michigan, and TCU wins theirs they are all undefeated.
OSU could slip in at four as the only one loss team, which was against another playoff team.
It wasn't thoughThe OSU/Michigan game was like the first round of an expanded playoff.
If TCU loses a close game do they drop out of top four?TCU losing would also likely do it and I think that is more likely to happen than USC losing.
Probably--do you think the committee truly believes TCU is one of the best 4 teams?If TCU loses a close game do they drop out of top four?
I don’t think they are. OSU would beat them nine out of ten times.Probably--do you think the committee truly believes TCU is one of the best 4 teams?
Does anyone believe that?
Yep. Instead of Michigan playing Purdue for instance, that game could be them playing a team atop another P5 conference leader. Games slated as a ccg could be as part of the bracket. I know it means rethinking years of tradition...but decisions would be made on field in h2h competion, not in a boardroom (where the Land Grant trophy could be the table.)I don’t think they are. OSU would beat them nine out of ten times.
That’s why there needs to be a playoff.
Just because you’re ranked fourth doesn’t mean you are actually the fourth best team.
Nobody wants a rematch, but in absolutely no way should the committee rig things so that the possibility does not exist. The 4 most successful teams should be ranked in the appropriate order.If I am on the committee I don't want the possibility of "revenge" matchups. That settles nothing. OSU lost big time on its home turf. That settled the matter.
The committee should look for uncontested possibilities.
If TCU loses (or especially USC), state what you consider is fair and why.OSU does not get in if they want a fair playoff.
That is your interpretation of things and would treat that specific game differently from every other game played. The CFP is only determining the four participants and their order based on how successful every team was.Think about this. The OSU/Michigan game was like the first round of an expanded playoff. It should be over for the loser, especially when the loss was at home.