See the link. One could read this short article and focus on the woes of college football players and the need to pay them a small salary or one could focus on the boosters giving players $100, in violation of ncaa rules. Of course, one could consider both topics as being relevant. They are relevant, but not mutually exclusive. It would be naive to think that "$100 handshakes" would stop if college football players were to receive a salary. The salary would never be enough, and zealous boosters will always be around trying to give their team an advantage.
Of course, the other question is whether Simms' account is true. Why would he lie about it after all these years? Let's assume he is being truthful. Will other Texas players come forward about $100 handshakes or similar handouts? Does anyone at Texas care? Does the ncaa care?
http://espn.go.com/college-football...-simms-recalls-100-handshakes-texas-longhorns
Of course, the other question is whether Simms' account is true. Why would he lie about it after all these years? Let's assume he is being truthful. Will other Texas players come forward about $100 handshakes or similar handouts? Does anyone at Texas care? Does the ncaa care?
http://espn.go.com/college-football...-simms-recalls-100-handshakes-texas-longhorns