LOL... They already are tyrants. They hate our Constitutional Republic and its checks and balances. They are memorized by the power to compel by threat of force or penalty. I mean, just look at Walz's adoration of the CCP.
https://townhall.com/columnists/jen...-will-be-tyrants-if-given-the-chance-n2644103
The future of the Supreme Court is on the line in November’s elections. If Vice President Kamala Harris and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer are victorious in November, the independent Supreme Court that the Framers bequeathed to us will be a thing of the past. That’s one of the big reasons why Harris must be defeated in her campaign for president, and why Schumer must be demoted to Minority Leader.
For the past three and a half years, the Biden-Harris administration has been on a rampage, disregarding the limits on executive authority emplaced by the Constitution. The Supreme Court has responded as it should, striking down many executive actions as the Court enforces the Constitution’s limits. In case after case – the employer vaccine mandate, the moratorium on evictions, and the various versions of Biden’s student loan payoff scams, for instance – the Court rejected the Biden-Harris administration’s overreach.
Biden wasn’t the only recent Democrat president to have his actions rejected by the Court for overreach. Before him, Barack Obama had his amnesty for illegal aliens struck down by the Court. Obama’s placement of three new members of the National Labor Relations Board without Senatorial confirmation was struck down, too.
Democrats are unhappy that their attempts to plow through the Constitution’s guardrails have been blocked by a Court whose majority is composed of men and women determined to keep the Constitution in place.
Democrats now seek to turn their despair into joy by changing the Court – or, failing that, by pressuring the Court, as Franklin Roosevelt did.
https://townhall.com/columnists/jen...-will-be-tyrants-if-given-the-chance-n2644103
The future of the Supreme Court is on the line in November’s elections. If Vice President Kamala Harris and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer are victorious in November, the independent Supreme Court that the Framers bequeathed to us will be a thing of the past. That’s one of the big reasons why Harris must be defeated in her campaign for president, and why Schumer must be demoted to Minority Leader.
For the past three and a half years, the Biden-Harris administration has been on a rampage, disregarding the limits on executive authority emplaced by the Constitution. The Supreme Court has responded as it should, striking down many executive actions as the Court enforces the Constitution’s limits. In case after case – the employer vaccine mandate, the moratorium on evictions, and the various versions of Biden’s student loan payoff scams, for instance – the Court rejected the Biden-Harris administration’s overreach.
Biden wasn’t the only recent Democrat president to have his actions rejected by the Court for overreach. Before him, Barack Obama had his amnesty for illegal aliens struck down by the Court. Obama’s placement of three new members of the National Labor Relations Board without Senatorial confirmation was struck down, too.
Democrats are unhappy that their attempts to plow through the Constitution’s guardrails have been blocked by a Court whose majority is composed of men and women determined to keep the Constitution in place.
Democrats now seek to turn their despair into joy by changing the Court – or, failing that, by pressuring the Court, as Franklin Roosevelt did.
