ADVERTISEMENT

Dismal US soccer must be coaching

Marylovesthelions

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Sep 29, 2008
9,333
6,117
1
80
Mt Dora FL
"There are 4,420,000 children participating in Soccer (Outdoor) between the ages of 6–12. There are 2,454,000 Soccer (Outdoor) participants between the ages of 13–17." From Google
A tiny country like Netherlands is running circles around our men.
 
"There are 4,420,000 children participating in Soccer (Outdoor) between the ages of 6–12. There are 2,454,000 Soccer (Outdoor) participants between the ages of 13–17." From Google
A tiny country like Netherlands is running circles around our men.
We will never be great at soccer on a global level because we have too many sports to choose from. Our best athletes play football, basketball, baseball, etc..in many countries, soccer is all they have so all their best athletes grow up dreaming of playing soccer.
 
"There are 4,420,000 children participating in Soccer (Outdoor) between the ages of 6–12. There are 2,454,000 Soccer (Outdoor) participants between the ages of 13–17." From Google
A tiny country like Netherlands is running circles around our men.
Are you new to this? Tiny countries have been running circles around US Soccer since the beginning of time.

Our players are just not very good. We never have any strikers that can actually score.
 
Pennsylvania:
1970 PA had 70,640 high school football players
2021 PA had 25,020 high school football players

1970 PA had 4,180 high school soccer players
2021 PA had 19,740 high school soccer players
811,238 total high school soccer players in the US…the lowest total since 2014/15. 1,093,234 play football. Over 500,000 play basketball. 482,160 play baseball. Then you have wrestling, track and field, LaCrosse, etc. soccer is not our main sport like it is in so many other countries.
 
PA has become more urbanized. All of the towns near Warren are about 39-40% as populated as they were I'm 1962 when I graduated from Warren HS.
 
In the US, the coaching is worse than the athletes playing the sport. Many of the body types that can play and star in other sports could not play soccer.
So, most of the stats you are seeing in this thread are irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bourbon n blues
By the way the Dutch will fold up like a cheese omelet for Messi and Argentina.
 
The best athletes migrate to other sports. NCAA and title ix are partially to blame. Roster size of ~29 players and only 9 scholarships to give. If soccer was a viable path to a free ride you might see more elite or nearly elite athletes stick with it.
 
811,238 total high school soccer players in the US…the lowest total since 2014/15. 1,093,234 play football. Over 500,000 play basketball. 482,160 play baseball. Then you have wrestling, track and field, LaCrosse, etc. soccer is not our main sport like it is in so many other countries.
High school soccer is leaking players to travel teams/private academies with coaches that don’t want them wasting time with high school games. If I was high school age now, I would have likely joined a club for better comp and coaching - foregoing high school games.
 
In the US, the coaching is worse than the athletes playing the sport. Many of the body types that can play and star in other sports could not play soccer.
So, most of the stats you are seeing in this thread are irrelevant.

You’re not going to send out an NBA center but most football skill position players fit the mold along with point and shooting guards.

Cristiano Ronaldo is 6’2 190.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
High school soccer is leaking players to travel teams/private academies with coaches that don’t want them wasting time with high school games. If I was high school age now, I would have likely joined a club for better comp and coaching - foregoing high school games.
My point in this thread has been that we’re never going to be a global powerhouse in soccer because it’s not one of our top sports. Other countries are completely wrapped up in soccer, but we’re not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psu00
Unfortunately as you watch the USMNT and USWNT, you see players that just dont seem to have the talent to compete. I'm always amazed to see many better skilled players throughout the college and pro ranks. For one reason or another they are not chosen to play for their PC national team.
 
Pennsylvania:
1970 PA had 70,640 high school football players
2021 PA had 25,020 high school football players

1970 PA had 4,180 high school soccer players
2021 PA had 19,740 high school soccer players

The difference is over in Europe kids of that age are playing for an academy that is attached to a top level club, being coached by someone who had 10 years of experience in the Premiere League, Bundesliga, or other top level clubs in a setup that is somewhat analogous to junior league hockey in Canada.

In the US those kids are being coached by the Social Studies teacher who played college soccer somewhere.
 
Unfortunately as you watch the USMNT and USWNT, you see players that just dont seem to have the talent to compete. I'm always amazed to see many better skilled players throughout the college and pro ranks. For one reason or another they are not chosen to play for their PC national team.
There isn’t a kid in the college ranks that should even have come close to sniffing this roster…you’re totally misjudging talent if you think that there are. Also pretty much true in the pro ranks…unless you think that teams like Leeds, Fulham, Chelsea, Juventus also can’t identify talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverPS
The difference is over in Europe kids of that age are playing for an academy that is attached to a top level club, being coached by someone who had 10 years of experience in the Premiere League, Bundesliga, or other top level clubs in a setup that is somewhat analogous to junior league hockey in Canada.

In the US those kids are being coached by the Social Studies teacher who played college soccer somewhere.

Don’t hate on UK elite (is that still a thing?)!
 
Unfortunately as you watch the USMNT and USWNT, you see players that just dont seem to have the talent to compete. I'm always amazed to see many better skilled players throughout the college and pro ranks. For one reason or another they are not chosen to play for their PC national team.
I'm sorry--is this trying to claim there's more talent in NCAA and MLS than on the national team because...
 
You’re not going to send out an NBA center but most football skill position players fit the mold along with point and shooting guards.

Cristiano Ronaldo is 6’2 190.

Yes... 340 lb mol OL and 290 lb DL would unlikely be doing any bicycle kicks, as well.
 
Our players are just not very good. We never have any strikers that can actually score.

True. I think what hits the casual soccer fan is that they never pay attention to soccer until it’s an Olympics or World Cup type event. Then they get on board. It’s not because they love soccer but because they’ll support anyone who puts on a USA jersey at an international event (whether it’s soccer or Olympic curling).

Then you hear a lot of the soccer fans start talking about how US players play in European leagues and this year they have a real chance to make some noise and beat some teams and people get on the bandwagon…… only to be hit with the Lucy yanking the football from Charlie Brown episode again and again.

The bottom line is that it’s not a very popular sport in the US and the team is, frankly, just not very good compared to the better teams. It’s like putting Tulane who does well in the AAC into the SEC and expecting them to win. ;).
 
Last edited:
This kind of repetitive, but, the best athletes in this country play basketball and football. The best athletes in every other country play soccer. That's all there is to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blair10 and bison13
This kind of repetitive, but, the best athletes in this country play basketball and football. The best athletes in every other country play soccer. That's all there is to it.
And depending on what parts of the country you’re in the normal soccer type athlete is now being taken away by lacrosse.
 
True. I think what hits the casual soccer fan is that they never pay attention to soccer until it’s an Olympics or World Cup type event. Then they get on board. It’s not because they love soccer but because they’ll support anyone who puts on a USA jersey at an international event (whether it’s soccer or Olympic curling).

Then you hear a lot of the soccer fans start talking about how US players play in European leagues and this year they have a real chance to make some noise and beat some teams and people get on the bandwagon…… only to be hit with the Lucy yanking the football from Charlie Brown episode again and again.

The bottom line is that it’s not a very popular sport in the US and the team is, frankly, just not very good compared to the better teams. It’s like putting Tulane who does well in the AAC into the SEC and expecting them to win. ;).
The issue to many then appears to be relatively unrealistic expectations…we’re probably about the 15th best team in the world, and we got knocked out in the round of 16. We were a coin flip to make it out of our group, but successfully did (and were the youngest team to do so)…expectations will increase in 3.5 years as we mature and have the advantage of playing at home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSUQBKeeper
The most common reply here is that our best athletes play football, basketball, etc., but that overlooks how different the skillset required for soccer is from those sports. Our sports prioritize size, strength, and quick bursts of activity. Soccer prioritizes coordination, aerobic fitness, and sustained concentration. Some of these, e.g. fast-twitch strength and slow-twitch endurance, are even contradictory. So there’s actually not a lot of overlap between the talent pools for American sports and soccer.

American soccer can’t compete due to structural reasons.

The way a person gets good at soccer is basically by playing with the ball constantly. Our kids can’t do that, because they spend most of their time in school.

Other soccer countries have solutions for that issue. In some of them, there are academies where education is integrated with the soccer training. In others, the kids aren’t exactly strictly required to go to school, giving them plenty of free time to kick around the ball with friends. In our culture, though, it’d be weird to have your child go to a specialized academy like that, and the hooky model is a nonstarter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Little J and OzLion
European and South American soccer is just different. It is a much larger sport worldwide. Elite juniors are involved with some of the most elite pro teams early in age. They come up through the ranks. NFL and NBA have the ncaa and high school as good feeder systems. Not to mention, the most elite athletes in the US don’t choose soccer. Imagine if Tyreek Hill or Lamar Jackson played soccer?

The Netherlands are a very good team. The US is very young (second youngest team in World Cup). They also finally have players overseas. That didn’t used to be the case. The epitome of pro soccer is in Europe. And a guy like Pulisic, who is one of the best if not the best player on the US squad, plays on an elite euro squad. But even then, he comes off the bench. Not a starter.

It’ll be interesting to see what happens over the next 4 years. They def need a striker. They don’t have one of those guys that just knows where to be all the time.

To complain that the US showing was disappointing, it’s like being pissed the Detroit Lions didn’t win the Super Bowl.
 
My point in this thread has been that we’re never going to be a global powerhouse in soccer because it’s not one of our top sports. Other countries are completely wrapped up in soccer, but we’re not.
There are certainly other dynamics to all of it, as some have outlined above but countries that kick our national butt in soccer have populations of a single American state.
Argentina has 6 million more people than California. You're comparing apples to oranges in the draw, which by all accounts should matter. Foreign countries don't kick our butt because we don't care, they kick our butt because they are better, with massively less people to draw from to boot.
If we were any good we'd win on numbers alone.
The US draws from a population of 330 million, France draws from 65 million.
Brazil is the only country in the world cup the US doesn't double the population at a minimum.
The US has twice the number kids in youth soccer than France....2.2 million to 4.4 million.
It shouldn't matter what our sport "priority" is because the US has the numbers to develop from. Usually massively larger numbers of youth players compared to soccer juggernauts.

 
The most common reply here is that our best athletes play football, basketball, etc., but that overlooks how different the skillset required for soccer is from those sports. Our sports prioritize size, strength, and quick bursts of activity. Soccer prioritizes coordination, aerobic fitness, and sustained concentration. ....
There is some real insight here. Europeans I talk to about soccer indicate that kids there spend allot more time working on skills such as dribbling. American coaches at the high school level prefer big kids that can kick the ball hard and can do 'one touch' passing. Give a US HS coach a small kid who has speed, stamina, is creative, and can dribble like a wizard and the coach won't know what to do with him.
 
There are certainly other dynamics to all of it, as some have outlined above but countries that kick our national butt in soccer have populations of a single American state.
Argentina has 6 million more people than California. You're comparing apples to oranges in the draw, which by all accounts should matter. Foreign countries don't kick our butt because we don't care, they kick our butt because they are better, with massively less people to draw from to boot.
If we were any good we'd win on numbers alone.
The US draws from a population of 330 million, France draws from 65 million.
Brazil is the only country in the world cup the US doesn't double the population at a minimum.
The US has twice the number kids in youth soccer than France....2.2 million to 4.4 million.
It shouldn't matter what our sport "priority" is because the US has the numbers to develop from. Usually massively larger numbers of youth players compared to soccer juggernauts.

And we don’t develop players because we don’t care enough….that’s my point.
 
And we don’t develop players because we don’t care enough….that’s my point.
That's baloney, development is up to the individual. If your talking about Team USA as a whole well then I'd agree to certain extent. But either way the people involved are training and trying their hardest....Dedicated and committed to being great players, coaches, trainers, administrators, etc like any other human on earth trying to do the same thing.
 
You guys don’t think someone like Lebron could be a world class goalie? 6’9” with speed,
Quickness, hand eye coordination…..someone like tyreek hill as striker…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOSCO2
That's baloney, development is up to the individual. If your talking about Team USA as a whole well then I'd agree to certain extent. But either way the people involved are training and trying their hardest....Dedicated and committed to being great players, coaches, trainers, administrators, etc like any other human on earth trying to do the same thing.
Most kids in this country want to grow up and play in the NBA, NFL, or MLB…not too many want to play in the World Cup. There just isn’t the commitment to soccer that there is to other sports in this country at any level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOSCO2
There is some real insight here. Europeans I talk to about soccer indicate that kids there spend allot more time working on skills such as dribbling. American coaches at the high school level prefer big kids that can kick the ball hard and can do 'one touch' passing. Give a US HS coach a small kid who has speed, stamina, is creative, and can dribble like a wizard and the coach won't know what to do with him.
This is part of it.

We were neighbors with a youth club coach from Portugal. They didn’t practice spacing or passing at all. All he cared about was dribbling at shooting. Said if you want elite players you should just work on individual skills until at least middle school. Doesn’t make for pretty play but if your goal is to make 20 world class players, I guess that’s part of it.

As mentioned earlier, to be great, a kid needs to eat, breathe, sleep soccer from the time they’re born. Watch it on TV, talk about it at the dinner table, play at recess, practice everyday. And all their friends need to do the same. Same reason Canada kicks our butt in hockey with 10% of our population.

We have plenty enough kids playing soccer and hockey. They’re just not immersed from day 1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Football79Dude
You guys don’t think someone like Lebron could be a world class goalie? 6’9” with speed,
Quickness, hand eye coordination…..someone like tyreek hill as striker…..
It’s not unreasonable to think that LeBron could have been a world class goalkeeper. That’s the position where size is most important and where ball handling skill is least. On the other hand, is there any evidence that the elite foreign-born NBA players like Doncic or Giannis were any good at soccer or goalkeeper growing up? I’m sure they played it at least casually. And if they weren’t any good at soccer, why would LeBron be?

Tyreek Hill is more interesting. Would he tire out too quickly to be effective? He looks small in the NFL, but he’s still a very muscular man. Would he be skilled enough with the ball? If he grew up in another country’s system, maybe. In America, he’d never have enough ball time to attain high-level technique. Yes, he’s very fast, but it’s better to have 99 technique and 75 speed than to have 99 speed and 75 technique.

GK and winger are the positions that require its players to have the most attributes in common with our sports’ players. But when you get to positions like central midfielder, the required skillset has even less in common with our sports. Players like Xavi, Iniesta, Pirlo, and Modric dominate; and they’d hardly be considered “athletic” by our sports’ standards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WIP2001
European and South American soccer is just different. It is a much larger sport worldwide. Elite juniors are involved with some of the most elite pro teams early in age. They come up through the ranks. NFL and NBA have the ncaa and high school as good feeder systems. Not to mention, the most elite athletes in the US don’t choose soccer. Imagine if Tyreek Hill or Lamar Jackson played soccer?

The Netherlands are a very good team. The US is very young (second youngest team in World Cup). They also finally have players overseas. That didn’t used to be the case. The epitome of pro soccer is in Europe. And a guy like Pulisic, who is one of the best if not the best player on the US squad, plays on an elite euro squad. But even then, he comes off the bench. Not a starter.

It’ll be interesting to see what happens over the next 4 years. They def need a striker. They don’t have one of those guys that just knows where to be all the time.

To complain that the US showing was disappointing, it’s like being pissed the Detroit Lions didn’t win the Super Bowl.
“NFL and NBA have the ncaa and high school as good feeder systems.”

Are we really sure of that? Or is it just that there aren’t any other countries to compare our results to? I don’t want to open a can of worms by mentioning race, but why are foreign white basketball players better than American whites? I can’t imagine the practice limits from the NCAA, among other things, help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WIP2001
This is part of it.

We were neighbors with a youth club coach from Portugal. They didn’t practice spacing or passing at all. All he cared about was dribbling at shooting. Said if you want elite players you should just work on individual skills until at least middle school. Doesn’t make for pretty play but if your goal is to make 20 world class players, I guess that’s part of it.

As mentioned earlier, to be great, a kid needs to eat, breathe, sleep soccer from the time they’re born. Watch it on TV, talk about it at the dinner table, play at recess, practice everyday. And all their friends need to do the same. Same reason Canada kicks our butt in hockey with 10% of our population.

We have plenty enough kids playing soccer and hockey. They’re just not immersed from day 1.
I’m not a soccer guy at all, but from hearing from others, the problem with US soccer is lack of skill. The problem is not that our best athletes play other sports as we don’t need guys who are stronger and faster. We have plenty of that already.

It seems in the wealthy European countries, kids are being sent to soccer academies at a young age, while in poorer countries they are just constantly kicking balls wherever they go. We just see neither of those cultures in the US.
 
The difference is over in Europe kids of that age are playing for an academy that is attached to a top level club, being coached by someone who had 10 years of experience in the Premiere League, Bundesliga, or other top level clubs in a setup that is somewhat analogous to junior league hockey in Canada.

In the US those kids are being coached by the Social Studies teacher who played college soccer somewhere.
Or the social studies teacher who never played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverPS and stf110
There just isn’t the commitment to soccer that there is to other sports in this country at any level.
It's such a preconceived misconception of soccer in America that they think the only reason we aren't "great" at it is because we don't care. What a ridiculous claim. Croatia is one of the better soccer teams in the world and has a population of 3.5 million people. For someone to contend that the USA and it's 4 million youth soccer players don't have the drive or will to be an equal at soccer is is just wildly ridiculous. A kid who grows up and wants to be a good soccer player in Charleston, West Virginia certainly has more resources to become great than some kid growing up in Croatia or Portugal and it's 10 million citizens. The national sentiment would have nothing to do with who and what that player becomes in the USA, the kids work ethic, athletic ability, smarts and commitment would have everything to do with it.
The answer is we lack skill and it masked by the fact we have so many to draw from compared to other countries. If we were drawing from the pool of players in say the Netherlands and its 17 million citizens, which is smaller than greater NYC, we'd really be bad.
When Penn State went 7-6 last year, they didn't have less wins than desirable because they weren't trying as hard or that coaching staff and admin were apathetic about winning but because they weren't as skilled as their opponents either physically or mentally or both. Everyone who makes it to the top levels of sports is trying as hard as they can, apathy isn't really acceptable in organized professional sports, it's counter to the core of being a competitor. So no, the fact the US isn't "great" at soccer has nothing to do with any "sentiment" of the population or the American television popularity of the sport.
 
It's such a preconceived misconception of soccer in America that they think the only reason we aren't "great" at it is because we don't care. What a ridiculous claim. Croatia is one of the better soccer teams in the world and has a population of 3.5 million people. For someone to contend that the USA and it's 4 million youth soccer players don't have the drive or will to be an equal at soccer is is just wildly ridiculous. A kid who grows up and wants to be a good soccer player in Charleston, West Virginia certainly has more resources to become great than some kid growing up in Croatia or Portugal and it's 10 million citizens. The national sentiment would have nothing to do with who and what that player becomes in the USA, the kids work ethic, athletic ability, smarts and commitment would have everything to do with it.
The answer is we lack skill and it masked by the fact we have so many to draw from compared to other countries. If we were drawing from the pool of players in say the Netherlands and its 17 million citizens, which is smaller than greater NYC, we'd really be bad.
When Penn State went 7-6 last year, they didn't have less wins than desirable because they weren't trying as hard or that coaching staff and admin were apathetic about winning but because they weren't as skilled as their opponents either physically or mentally or both. Everyone who makes it to the top levels of sports is trying as hard as they can, apathy isn't really acceptable in organized professional sports, it's counter to the core of being a competitor. So no, the fact the US isn't "great" at soccer has nothing to do with any "sentiment" of the population or the American television popularity of the sport.
So we have far more people to choose from, we have far more resources at our disposal, we have all these kids growing up wanting to play for the World Cup, yet we can’t compete with countries a tenth of our size because we lack the skill? That makes little sense. Why do we dominate in basketball, football, baseball, track and field, swimming, etc. but we can’t compete in soccer? It’s because in all these other countries all they want to do is play soccer. It’s like Norway and skiing. If it was just about population, China and India would dominate every sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blair10
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT