You're delusional.
I said it's possible they are preventing the release of more information because there's stuff in there which is more damaging. This is not an extraordinary claim. I have no visibility into what that damaging information might be, or how much of it there might be, or who it might or might not implicate. I have said it's a guess. It's also a plausible explanation, just like the explanations I provided as possible reasons the emails look funny to some of you are more plausible than Ray's claims that nefarious activity has definitely been shown.
I said Ray's comments, at BEST, indicate that one can't use the precise formatting of, and timestamps of (compared to each other, anyways), emails to prove they were altered. The content of the emails (the words in them, not the formatting; not which time zone the timestamp is displayed in; not how many HTML space characters were inserted as a result of a transition activity) is what's important.
Finally, Freeh was not operating under the standard of a criminal trial. If a defense team, rather than an investigator, wants to use logic like Ray's to establish reasonable doubt, it might work IF AND ONLY IF the formatting and timestamp stuff was critical to the claims being made. In this case I don't think that's true.
I'm trying to protect the image of our school as "not completely full of lunatics".
Hope this helps.