ADVERTISEMENT

Eyes for Lies EXPERT emphatically states that Amanda Knox is guilty.

TheGLOV

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
http://www.eyesforlies.com/blog/2015/03/amanda-knox-speaks-out-2/

My-my-my!

Ahem, I love to say I told you so,.....so I will:

I TOLD YOU SO!

Doesn't mean anything but I sure do feel good about it.

Special thanks to "mathprof" for finding this article.

3dgrin.r191677.gif


Rosie Ruiz, Twana Brawley, O.J. Simpson, Hillary Clinton and now Amanda Knox. - Liars extraordinaire!

**I threw in the H. Clinton to stir the pot some!**

Heh-heh!

http://www.eyesforlies.com/blog/2015/03/italian-court-overturns-knox-conviction/


Love these:

"Totally missing from Knox's "thank-you" speech is any anger that she was (as she claims) falsely accused and for four years falsely imprisoned. She even says at one point "I'm grateful [for the decision]" and "I'm the lucky one". Lucky? Would an innocent person truly choose that word in this situation? There's much more evidence beyond language use (Knox's DNA was found co-mingled with the victim's blood in five places, for example) but nevertheless I found her choice of words and lack of anger after the acquittal very telling."
 
I have to say that I didn't follow the Amanda Knox story closely at all. However, if she truly said 'I'm the lucky one' and didn't show any anger or displeasure over prior events, then I tend to think you're right. I know if I was wrongly imprisoned for four years I wouldn't be smiling, waving, and saying 'I'm the lucky one'. I'd be angry over losing 4 years of my life and I wouldn't hold back from letting the prosecution know it.

As for Hillary- I fail to see how adding her name to that list stirs the pot. ;)
 
Wow. I be cursing the justice system and vow to sue everyone responsibe for locking me up for multiple years. Definitely strange choice of words but everyone reacts different I guess. I would never conclude she was guilty for saying this though.
 
She may have been judged not guilty, but I doubt she is "innocent". Kind of like that football coach at Notre Dame!
 
Fair enough throwing in HC, but why not her hubby too? Or Dick Cheney (who's lies actually caused thousands of lives and dollars)? Or the vast majority of ANY of our public officials?
 
"I'm the lucky one". Lucky?

Amanda Knox clarified that in a subsequent interview to which I, unfortunately, do not have a link.

"What I meant about being lucky. Well, I blush to say this ... but I just feel so lucky to be cyberstalked by TheGLOV."
 
EXPERT? By what standard is this "Eyes for Lies" person


deemed an "EXPERT?" Personally, even though the judicial system is not always 100% accurate in their findings, I'd much rather have a court of law determine a criminal case opposed to some "EXPERT" who claims they can determine the truth by looking into someone's eyes when they speak.
 
Lies for Eyes -- what a breakthrough idea

We could save a lot of money on our stupid inefficient criminal justice system. Just have Lies for Eyes do it because Lies for Eyes has the ability to tell who is innocent and who is guilty just be LOOKING AT VIDEO of a person.

Just amazing what modern technology makes possible.
 
In that interview (still no darn link) she added somewhat ruefully, "I

just hope that TheGLOV's ardent obsession with me doesn't wear him out."
 
Re: Lies for Eyes -- what a breakthrough idea

You're on to something. Lies for Eyes, however, is not without some superstition. He carries this talisman to ensure absolute certainty in judgement.

b7911.jpg
 
Better yet how about Tarot reading cards.....

....or maybe a Ouija board to determine guilt, or innocence. It would save
millions in court costs.
 
She Absolutely, did it.............. No Doubt, in my mind, about That!

Amanda Knox, got away with "Murder" Period!
 
Would you mind asking this soothsayer what she has to say about Louis Freeh? Thanks.
 
I heard that Louis Freeh is going to issue a report that says Joe Paterno committed the murders while he was visiting relatives in Italy. That would make as much sense as anything else Freeh has said.
 
If Glov ever says anything other than "I could tell by her body language" stuff regarding her I will listen.

Those articles he posted that somehow were supposed to support his thoughts were from some literally raving lunatics.

Maybe she is guilty. Most logical signs point to no. Maybe she just is an icy person.
 
She, at times, does look hot.

This post was edited on 3/31 7:27 PM by john4psu
 
Re: Clemente just efficiently trashed all your arguments


She's guilty simons96.

The silly ones are the ones who think she is innocent.

Nobody {hates} Knox. Just a deep dislike for what she did and has not paid for.

You keep on drinking the innocent blue not-guilty cool-aid.

Me, God, and St. Joseph will be waiting for her at the pearly gates: tote board in hand!

3dgrin.r191677.gif
 
precise and factual


Originally posted by TheGLOV:

She's guilty simons96.

The silly ones are the ones who think she is innocent.

Nobody {hates} Knox. Just a deep dislike for what she did and has not paid for.

You keep on drinking the innocent blue not-guilty cool-aid.

Me, God, and St. Joseph will be waiting for her at the pearly gates: tote board in hand!

3dgrin.r191677.gif
glad you addressed Clemente's comments point by point
 
Yea, she has to be guilty, I called Madame Cleo and she said so....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT