Wasn't impressed with that crew at all!
I'm all ready to buy the conspiracy, given PSU's history, but then I look at the examples and they're just not very compelling.
The LOS calls .... The first one, the Alabama receiver is lined up 2 yards back from the LOS-- the play is designed for him to be moving forward at the snap and that is legal. If he's in the neutral zone at the snap, it's by inches and wouldn't have been visible in real time. Also didn't make a bit of difference in the play.
Meanwhile on the punt block, it sure looks to me like the Ga. defender is in the neutral zone when the ball is snapped and his ability to jump the snap was the key to the play.
The shove on the QB's head was marginal. It should have been called if the Alabama D was getting chippy and there was a need for the officials to make a statement. But by itself, little extra shoves aren't called a lot of the time unless they're an attempt to injure someone. It's unnecessary roughness but depending on the situation it might be a little cheap to call it.
Contrast that one with the no-call on the Washington player targeting McSorley helmet to helmet after McSorley had slid and given himself up.
If this is the best Atlanta fans can come up with in a whole game of film, I don't see a big problem.
I'm all ready to buy the conspiracy, given PSU's history, but then I look at the examples and they're just not very compelling.
The LOS calls .... The first one, the Alabama receiver is lined up 2 yards back from the LOS-- the play is designed for him to be moving forward at the snap and that is legal. If he's in the neutral zone at the snap, it's by inches and wouldn't have been visible in real time. Also didn't make a bit of difference in the play.
Meanwhile on the punt block, it sure looks to me like the Ga. defender is in the neutral zone when the ball is snapped and his ability to jump the snap was the key to the play.
The shove on the QB's head was marginal. It should have been called if the Alabama D was getting chippy and there was a need for the officials to make a statement. But by itself, little extra shoves aren't called a lot of the time unless they're an attempt to injure someone. It's unnecessary roughness but depending on the situation it might be a little cheap to call it.
Contrast that one with the no-call on the Washington player targeting McSorley helmet to helmet after McSorley had slid and given himself up.
If this is the best Atlanta fans can come up with in a whole game of film, I don't see a big problem.
I hate BIG officiating, but honestly wouldn’t hosing Bama be smarter? I mean it is Bama who kept the sweethearts from Columbus from another embarrassment.
The way UGA is recruiting, that horse is out of the barn.No. Bama will still be Bama win or lose. I would think that it's smarter to knock UGA down a bit. Don't want to create two juggernauts in the SEC.
As others have pointed out, offensive players aren't permitted to be moving forward when the ball is snapped.I
The LOS calls .... The first one, the Alabama receiver is lined up 2 yards back from the LOS-- the play is designed for him to be moving forward at the snap and that is legal. If he's in the neutral zone at the snap, it's by inches and wouldn't have been visible in real time. Also didn't make a bit of difference in the play.
Meanwhile on the punt block, it sure looks to me like the Ga. defender is in the neutral zone when the ball is snapped and his ability to jump the snap was the key to the play.
The shove on the QB's head was marginal. It should have been called if the Alabama D was getting chippy and there was a need for the officials to make a statement. But by itself, little extra shoves aren't called a lot of the time unless they're an attempt to injure someone. It's unnecessary roughness but depending on the situation it might be a little cheap to call it.