Can't see the comments. what does it say?Read the comments. Nice twist to the story.
Can't see the comments. what does it say?
When you list tickets on Stubhub, you are required to give them a credit card number to charge in case you can't fulfill any purchase. In this case, why didn't they charge the person listing the tickets (and reneging) the $6000 or whatever it would cost to replace the tickets for the buyer. Either way, based on how the website is supposed to work, they should be providing 4 comparable tickets to the buyer at the cost he agreed to and Stubhub is responsible for any difference in the cost themselves (or they can pursue it from the seller as noted).
That's exactly what Stubhub did for me when a guy backed out of an Opening Day ticket. I got a seat in the same section that actually was a little better (down lower) fo theprice I paid. The original seller was charged the difference. Note that Reds Opening Day is a tough ticket--in my case not $1000s but over a hundred for an outfield seat.
I wonder why that didn't happen in this case.... There may be more to the story.
As someone who has used StubHub quite a bit to buy and sell tickets, I have a question. I'm guessing that the tickets in question were electronic tickets. What if they were hard tickets and shipped via UPS?
I've sold tickets that way. If the buyer would of bought hard tickets they should of arrived to him via UPS in a few days. By then, the tickets would be in his possession and StubHub would no longer be involved.
I guess the buyer still could of got screwed by the seller then if the seller went into his season ticket account and transferred those final season game to electronic format.
Many sellers only ship tickets at the last minute, I never knew why until now.