You know how much the left loves central planning. It's all about control. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if they came up with the Barbeque Police. I wouldn't put it past Walz to create a hotline to rat out your neighbors if they see you grilling more than once a week.
https://www.realclearenergy.org/art...ol_is_on_the_menu_if_kamala_wins_1061219.html
Many are familiar with the Biden-Harris Administration efforts to ban gas stoves, gasoline-powered lawn equipment, and forcing electric vehicle mandates. But there is one front on the green takeover that a potential President Harris is targeting next, and it’s getting less attention.
In 2019, while Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign failed to take off, her policy ambitions were clear—and they are resurfacing now as she eyes her latest opportunity. One of her more alarming proposals was to change the U.S. dietary guidelines to reduce beef consumption. It didn’t gain traction then, but as she vies for a White House re-deux, your dinner plate is about to be politicized.
In a recent Washington Post opinion piece, an author provocatively claimed that "Cows are the Coal of Food." It’s no accident that the comparison was meant as an insult to both beef and coal, but ironically, they couldn’t have picked a more fitting analogy. Coal, despite the billions spent to destroy the industry, still provides essential energy to over 16 percent of American homes—four times more than solar energy. As an added benefit, it also works when the sun doesn’t shine, ensuring that millions of Americans stay warm during winter and keep the lights on year-round. Likewise, beef is a critical source of protein and nutrition for millions around the globe, serving as a dietary staple in many cultures. Both coal and beef are central to our way of life, yet both are being demonized by political agendas driven by Kamala Harris and her extreme environmentalism supporters.
And now, food is in the crosshairs of these environmental activists. During the UN Climate Week, activists argued that food production consumes 30 percent of the world's energy. Setting aside the accuracy of the claim, the bigger issue is the open advocation for the manipulation of our food supply in the name of their agenda. When a group this radical starts meddling with something as essential as food, it’s time for everyone to be concerned. Kamala Harris should be asked if she agrees with this Climate Project 2030.
Under a Harris presidency, those environmental activists would not just be whispering in the ear of government—they will likely be writing policy. The Biden-Harris administration has already pushed sweeping regulations on cars, gas stoves and furnaces. Why should we believe our grocery shelves would be immune from the same top-down control?
https://www.realclearenergy.org/art...ol_is_on_the_menu_if_kamala_wins_1061219.html
Many are familiar with the Biden-Harris Administration efforts to ban gas stoves, gasoline-powered lawn equipment, and forcing electric vehicle mandates. But there is one front on the green takeover that a potential President Harris is targeting next, and it’s getting less attention.
In 2019, while Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign failed to take off, her policy ambitions were clear—and they are resurfacing now as she eyes her latest opportunity. One of her more alarming proposals was to change the U.S. dietary guidelines to reduce beef consumption. It didn’t gain traction then, but as she vies for a White House re-deux, your dinner plate is about to be politicized.
In a recent Washington Post opinion piece, an author provocatively claimed that "Cows are the Coal of Food." It’s no accident that the comparison was meant as an insult to both beef and coal, but ironically, they couldn’t have picked a more fitting analogy. Coal, despite the billions spent to destroy the industry, still provides essential energy to over 16 percent of American homes—four times more than solar energy. As an added benefit, it also works when the sun doesn’t shine, ensuring that millions of Americans stay warm during winter and keep the lights on year-round. Likewise, beef is a critical source of protein and nutrition for millions around the globe, serving as a dietary staple in many cultures. Both coal and beef are central to our way of life, yet both are being demonized by political agendas driven by Kamala Harris and her extreme environmentalism supporters.
And now, food is in the crosshairs of these environmental activists. During the UN Climate Week, activists argued that food production consumes 30 percent of the world's energy. Setting aside the accuracy of the claim, the bigger issue is the open advocation for the manipulation of our food supply in the name of their agenda. When a group this radical starts meddling with something as essential as food, it’s time for everyone to be concerned. Kamala Harris should be asked if she agrees with this Climate Project 2030.
Under a Harris presidency, those environmental activists would not just be whispering in the ear of government—they will likely be writing policy. The Biden-Harris administration has already pushed sweeping regulations on cars, gas stoves and furnaces. Why should we believe our grocery shelves would be immune from the same top-down control?
