We lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't know that.We lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
Ironically, Michigan fans pretty much spent the entire two years of Tom Brady’s tenure as starting QB demanding he be benched for “stud recruit” Drew Henson!Hype and expectations for Drew give him only one direction to go, and that's down. He better play like Tom Brady or he will get booed worse than Sean, it's sad to say.
The booing of Sean Clifford has frankly been very embarrassing.Hype and expectations for Drew give him only one direction to go, and that's down. He better play like Tom Brady or he will get booed worse than Sean, it's sad to say.
A college player should never be booed, IMHO.The booing of Sean Clifford has frankly been very embarrassing.
Particularly pregame at the white out in front of all of those recruits. Bad look.The booing of Sean Clifford has frankly been very embarrassing.
I'll go further than that, I wouldn't boo a pro player either. Unless he showed his azz on the court or field with some kind of boorish behavior. Even then, I'm not a booing guy. Nobody should be booed for sub-par performance, no matter what you paid for your ticket. It doesn't come with a guarantee of anything besides getting through the turnstile. Nobody's out there trying to underperform. Rarely, anyway.A college player should never be booed, IMHO.
Usually agree, but might be ok when said player is older than like 8 NFL starting QB’s.A college player should never be booed, IMHO.
What a phony premise and argumentWe lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
Very bad look. Also, I'm baffled by what QB play PSU fans have been accustomed to that makes them think that we could do so much better than Sean Clifford.Particularly pregame at the white out in front of all of those recruits. Bad look.
Pros are there to win and make money. They try to play this "if you don't show up, you're not a fan" and then free agent out when they can make more money. So if they can be motivated to make more money over team, I can be motivated to save money by not spending money on that same crappy team. My point is, I have no problem booing a pro player. I guess, in my mind, it is still questionable if a college player is a pro or not.I'll go further than that, I wouldn't boo a pro player either. Unless he showed his azz on the court or field with some kind of boorish behavior. Even then, I'm not a booing guy. Nobody should be booed for sub-par performance, no matter what you paid for your ticket. It doesn't come with a guarantee of anything besides getting through the turnstile. Nobody's out there trying to underperform. Rarely, anyway.
Purdue would have 4 lossesWe lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
You just had to, didn’t you. Some kinda compulsion. Maybe a personality disorder. A genetic flaw……We lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
Not only embarrassing, but something staff has been asked to explain by parents of recruits. When a so called "loyal" fanbase reacts in this manner......it doesn't go unnoticed. Especially when the negative behavior is directed at someone who has done absolutely nothing to deserve it.The booing of Sean Clifford has frankly been very embarrassing.
You really think a true frosh in his first game out of HS would have led the team on that final drive? I wished Franklin would have played Allar more later in the year, but PSU doesn’t beat Purdue without Clifford leading that final drive.You don't know that.
I think it was the right decision to start Clifford because Allar was still getting his footing at the D1 level but there is no way you know that we would have lost with Allar. In fact it was Cliffords 72 yard pick 6 that put that game at risk. Fortunately he led a great drive to make up for that horrible mistake.
Who says he would have needed to?You really think a true frosh in his first game out of HS would have led the team on that final drive? I wished Franklin would have played Allar more later in the year, but PSU doesn’t beat Purdue without Clifford leading that final drive.
I was raised near Philadelphia and "booing" has been a part of most sporting events I attended in my youth. My former Marine old man told me that it was disrespectful and classless. It is important to note that he never took me to a regular season Eagles game....all 76ers, Flyers, Phils and college hoops.Pros are there to win and make money. They try to play this "if you don't show up, you're not a fan" and then free agent out when they can make more money. So if they can be motivated to make more money over team, I can be motivated to save money by not spending money on that same crappy team. My point is, I have no problem booing a pro player. I guess, in my mind, it is still questionable if a college player is a pro or not.
Ha! I simply quit going. Browns games are a bunch of drunk hoods venting their anger. Why go? They can boo so they want. On tv, the nfl pumps in cheers anyway and I don’t hear them.I was raised near Philadelphia and "booing" has been a part of most sporting events I attended in my youth. My former Marine old man told me that it was disrespectful and classless. It is important to note that he never took me to a regular season Eagles game....all 76ers, Flyers, Phils and college hoops.
I've seen our fans boo Mike Schmidt, Larry Bowa, Greg Luzinski amongst other notable greats who were my heroes. I don't boo. Ever.
Until Ben Simmons. When he came back to Philly a few weeks ago I screamed at my TV with pure rage. Good for him that he fell to a depleted lineup of relative nobodies.
His combo of wasted talent, lack of initiative to address weaknesses in his game, and spotlight seeking Hollywood BS ( I didn't even know who Kendal Jenner was until she started stalking him at games) has found a deep-seated well of bile that will likely surface whenever he is close to the 215 area code. Always an excuse, or someone to blame.
I almost bought a Mister Softee t shirt but didn't since I try to not roll like that : )
But you never know....
I said that I agreed with starting Clifford but there's no way to know we would have lost with Allar. You just can't say that as a statement of fact.You really think a true frosh in his first game out of HS would have led the team on that final drive? I wished Franklin would have played Allar more later in the year, but PSU doesn’t beat Purdue without Clifford leading that final drive.
We don’t know it, but the coaches who make these decisions for a living and put their livelihood on the line every week have a better idea than we do and they felt Clifford gave us the best shot at winning. I’ll trust them over the posters on here (crazy, right?).You don't know that.
I think it was the right decision to start Clifford because Allar was still getting his footing at the D1 level but there is no way you know that we would have lost with Allar. In fact it was Cliffords 72 yard pick 6 that put that game at risk. Fortunately he led a great drive to make up for that horrible mistake.
Who said allar should have started the Purdue game?We don’t know it, but the coaches who make these decisions for a living and put their livelihood on the line every week have a better idea than we do and they felt Clifford gave us the best shot at winning. I’ll trust them over the posters on here (crazy, right?).
I was responding to a post that asked who could say that we would have lost to Purdue if Allar had started…my answer, the coaches.Who said allar should have started the Purdue game?
The coaches said we’d have lost if we started Allar? I’ve never seen that reported nor have I ever seen anyone make that claim other than the OP. How would they know?I was responding to a post that asked who could say that we would have lost to Purdue if Allar had started…my answer, the coaches.
The coaches thought Clifford was the best choice. So did I. But that doesn't mean we would have definitely lost with Allar.I was responding to a post that asked who could say that we would have lost to Purdue if Allar had started…my answer, the coaches.
I don’t know about peeing their pants, but most of them are like me and probably wake up three times a night to go to the bathroom.Most of the people that boo, couldn't stand in front of 100,000 people for one play, without peeing their pants, let alone run an offense or play defense.
No, it was the OP of this thread. Just another ‘kick the hornets nest’ thread. One not worth discussion….yet, hear we are.The coaches said we’d have lost if we started Allar? I’ve never seen that reported nor have I ever seen anyone make that claim other than the OP. How would they know?
Who gives a shit about the Rose Bowl? How do grown men get so wrapped up in this exhibition versus a different exhibition? Setting aside the fact that Allar might have beaten Purdue too, is getting to say "We made it to the Rose Bowl against a crappy 3 loss team!" better for all parties in the long run over getting Allar a full season of experience? Thank God there is no possible way that Clifford can be back next year, and good luck to him with figuring out the rest of his life after football!We lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
I dont see OSU or Mich touching us next year.15-0 next year.
Positive outlook. We're beating Utah as well.
So you would throw away an entire year just to get one player who may never be any good experience? This has to be one of the dumbest post I seen in a long time. We have no clue how Allar will turn out. He may end up being worse than Clifford. That is why real coaches like Franklin is making millions and you are whining on a message board and throwing out ridiculous ideas. What positions do you think playing time should be based on recruiting stars and not actually earning it? Should that just apply to QB position? If we land a 5 star running back should we bench Allen and Singleton? After all according to you playing time isn’t earned it given based on high school stars. Joey Porter Jr was only 3 star recruit he according to you should have been benched to give a 4 star guy experience.Who gives a shit about the Rose Bowl? How do grown men get so wrapped up in this exhibition versus a different exhibition? Setting aside the fact that Allar might have beaten Purdue too, is getting to say "We made it to the Rose Bowl against a crappy 3 loss team!" better for all parties in the long run over getting Allar a full season of experience? Thank God there is no possible way that Clifford can be back next year, and good luck to him with figuring out the rest of his life after football!
Yet both threads get lots of replies. PT Barnum was right.This original post is so bad yet this db thought he’d post it on this board and the MacAndrew board lol
We lose that game. Purdue has three losses as would have Penn State. Purdue would have gone to the Rose Bowl.
We're in the Rose Bowl because Franklin played Clifford.
Why would Allar have had to stay in for the entire season if he wasn't performing well? Is that some NCAA rule that you "seen" somewhere? The schedule set up nicely to break in a new guy, or at least find out at a minimum whether his stars were legit or not, but instead Franklin chose to give Clifford an extra year farewell tour. So Franklin actually wasted a whole year for Allar, and hence the team, by playing him only in absolute garbage time, especially against several weaker teams when he should have entered several series earlier. And I would bet that part of it had to do with getting Clifford the passing record, and also not risking having another QB come in and outperform Sean on the field, which has actually been a question for several seasons in a row.So you would throw away an entire year just to get one player who may never be any good experience? This has to be one of the dumbest post I seen in a long time. We have no clue how Allar will turn out. He may end up being worse than Clifford. That is why real coaches like Franklin is making millions and you are whining on a message board and throwing out ridiculous ideas. What positions do you think playing time should be based on recruiting stars and not actually earning it? Should that just apply to QB position? If we land a 5 star running back should we bench Allen and Singleton? After all according to you playing time isn’t earned it given based on high school stars. Joey Porter Jr was only 3 star recruit he according to you should have been benched to give a 4 star guy experience.