ADVERTISEMENT

Herbie the Homer Hypocrite

Fair...I mean, do none of you actually understand why Ohio State got in over us?
Not agreeing with it doesn't mean we don't get it. Quit acting like your smarter than everyone on the board and that we're all morons. Do you not understand that beating a team and winning the conference always results in a playoff appearance in other sports?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBrown and Grass
Not agreeing with it doesn't mean we don't get it. Quit acting like your smarter than everyone on the board and that we're all morons. Do you not understand that beating a team and winning the conference always results in a playoff appearance in other sports?
You're against that kind of playoff
 
I read the first half of this thread and was like "who are they talking about? who's the blowhio state fan??" then I read the name we do not speak of, and realized oh yeah, this is not making sense because I have that toolbag on ignore. Just got sick of his schtick. He knows everything, just ask him. and if you disagree with him, out comes the condescending patronizing nonsense. Responding to him is like clicking on Clay Travis articles. he's looking for responses so he can work his schtick. Seriously people, just ignore this clown...

FYSA, I've lived in NC for the past almost 10 years. I'm still a penn state/eagles/flyers/phils fan. Anyone that claims to be a fan of a team, then moves to another place and shills for that team, isn't a fan at all. go away and let the adults converse...
 
I do. You don't believe ALL conference winners should be included. See Sun Belt MAC MWC CUSA AAC. You can't have it both ways. All in or this system
I can have it both ways....simply by making it all P5 conference winners and the highest ranked conference winner of the remaining conferences. There's no rule that says they have to include every podunct conference out there.
 
I can have it both ways....simply by making it all P5 conference winners and the highest ranked conference winner of the remaining conferences. There's no rule that says they have to include every podunct conference out there.
That's what every other league does. College and pro.
 
The real reason is our dislike of Ohio State and the belief the Big Trn caters to them and we're the red headed stepchild. Washington's SOS is why they should have been out.
Actually the real reason I am upset is that the committee ignored their own guidelines. You keep claiming that PSU and OSU were not "comparable". That is your only argument and frankly it's ridiculous. You claim PSU loses early in the season disqualify us but ignore the guidelines that tell the committee to consider key injuries. You ignore the fact that the first guideline and number 1 emphasis is conference championships. You ignore the fact that head to head is one of the guidelines. You ignore the fact that the guidelines admonish the polls for often not considering those factors. You hang your entire argument on being able to pick and choose only one of the criteria. Simple truth is, just like the committee, you ignore the criteria to get your favorite team in, OSU. I suggest you read the criteria "objectively". Here's a link for you.
http://www.collegefootballplayoff.c...0//CFP_Selection_Committee_Protocol.pdf?id=23
 
That's what every other league does. College and pro.
Then let the four other conferences have a play in tournament and the winner goes into the 8 team playoff. If they want to cut their season down to allow time for extra games, then they can do that. The rest of the P5 teams should not have to cut regular season games to make room for them to be involved. If they really want to be in the mix then they can make the changes.
 
Actually the real reason I am upset is that the committee ignored their own guidelines. You keep claiming that PSU and OSU were not "comparable". That is your only argument and frankly it's ridiculous. You claim PSU loses early in the season disqualify us but ignore the guidelines that tell the committee to consider key injuries. You ignore the fact that the first guideline and number 1 emphasis is conference championships. You ignore the fact that head to head is one of the guidelines. You ignore the fact that the guidelines admonish the polls for often not considering those factors. You hang your entire argument on being able to pick and choose only one of the criteria. Simple truth is, just like the committee, you ignore the criteria to get your favorite team in, OSU. I suggest you read the criteria "objectively". Here's a link for you.
http://www.collegefootballplayoff.c...0//CFP_Selection_Committee_Protocol.pdf?id=23

Those guidelines are with "comparable teams
Again, not an Ohio State fan--I simply accepted we weren't comparable last year. You don't. That's fine but in this system the committee determines that. If we had a real playoff we wouldn't be complaining because we would have been included the last two years.
 
Then let the four other conferences have a play in tournament and the winner goes into the 8 team playoff. If they want to cut their season down to allow time for extra games, then they can do that. The rest of the P5 teams should not have to cut regular season games to make room for them to be involved. If they really want to be in the mix then they can make the changes.


Why? No other sport is set up that way including other levels of football
 
Why? No other sport is set up that way including other levels of football
Again, there's no rule that says it has to be like other sports. It's not like other sports now. The goal is not to make it like other sports, it's to make it better than it is now and hopefully better than other sports. Maybe some other sports should change the way they do it...like college basketball. Too many teams that will never win the tournament. Too many first round blowouts and too easy of a path for the 1 and 2 seeds.
 
Again, there's no rule that says it has to be like other sports. It's not like other sports now. The goal is not to make it like other sports, it's to make it better than it is now and hopefully better than other sports. Maybe some other sports should change the way they do it...like college basketball. Too many teams that will never win the tournament. Too many first round blowouts and too easy of a path for the 1 and 2 seeds.
Right a 15 never beat a 2 and their second round matchups aren't easy.
 
Right a 15 never beat a 2 and their second round matchups aren't easy.
In terms of football, the FCS schools have their own playoffs, why can't the GO5 schools have their own?

In terms of basketball, a 15 has very rarely beat a 2 and a 16 has never beat a 1. So eliminating the 16's would have never changed anything except giving the 1's a practice game. Eliminating the 15's would have had a small blip of a change a couple of times....not really altering history by eliminating the cupcake conferences. But adding in bubble teams from the P5 conferences could have made huge differences.
 
I read the first half of this thread and was like "who are they talking about? who's the blowhio state fan??" then I read the name we do not speak of, and realized oh yeah, this is not making sense because I have that toolbag on ignore. Just got sick of his schtick. He knows everything, just ask him. and if you disagree with him, out comes the condescending patronizing nonsense. Responding to him is like clicking on Clay Travis articles. he's looking for responses so he can work his schtick. Seriously people, just ignore this clown...

Finally did put him on ignore. Already notice a lot of "clutter" is gone.
 
In terms of football, the FCS schools have their own playoffs, why can't the GO5 schools have their own?

In terms of basketball, a 15 has very rarely beat a 2 and a 16 has never beat a 1. So eliminating the 16's would have never changed anything except giving the 1's a practice game. Eliminating the 15's would have had a small blip of a change a couple of times....not really altering history by eliminating the cupcake conferences. But adding in bubble teams from the P5 conferences could have made huge differences.

That's fine...split FBS into two levels but unless that happens it has to be all inclusive or it's still a joke. 16 is simple...and easy
 
I didn't watch the show, nor will I ever plan on watching it. That said, Ohio State has absolutely no rightful place as one of the top four teams in the country. They were crushed by 30+ to an OK Iowa team within the last month. Doesn't pass the eye test. Herbie saying they do deserve it (assuming the OP is accurate) doesn't pass the homer smell test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_1eeb2b426hv3y
OSU would get in over Alabama because Alabama doesn't have any good wins. It's best win is LSU at 17, who lost to Troy. OSU with a win over Wisconsin would have #4 Wisconsin, #9 PSU, and #16 MSU. Committee has said in general it looks at best wins over the best/worst loss. OSU got in last year because it had 3 top 10 wins (OU, UW, UM).
 
OSU would get in over Alabama because Alabama doesn't have any good wins. It's best win is LSU at 17, who lost to Troy. OSU with a win over Wisconsin would have #4 Wisconsin, #9 PSU, and #16 MSU. Committee has said in general it looks at best wins over the best/worst loss. OSU got in last year because it had 3 top 10 wins (OU, UW, UM).

I love when losses are just suddenly ignored in 2017 and weren't in 2018. Further, I love when schedules are ignored in 2016 when they aren't in 2017.
 
OSU would get in over Alabama because Alabama doesn't have any good wins. It's best win is LSU at 17, who lost to Troy. OSU with a win over Wisconsin would have #4 Wisconsin, #9 PSU, and #16 MSU. Committee has said in general it looks at best wins over the best/worst loss. OSU got in last year because it had 3 top 10 wins (OU, UW, UM).

Really don't care to see Ohio State get it's ass kicked by Clemson again, and that's what would happen.
 
He was right last year...he also supported us getting in over Washington last year. Ohio State 2016 resume >>>>>>>> Penn State 2016 resume. It wasn't even close.

He's not a homer by any definition. You're creating bias that doesn't exit because of your bias
I agree he was right last year. Totally disagree as to whether it was close. It couldn’t have been closer. And if we’d have pulled it off and beaten them this year, we’d likely be in the catbird’s seat. If only...

And while I also get frustrated by Herbstreit when he does his inevitable lobby for his school To the detriment of ours or others, I also don’t really watch him much. He’s a plant and a good analyst—or talking head.

And if ESPN didn’t want an OSU cheerleader behind the mic, they wouldn’t have hired an OSU QB to sit behind the mic. His objectivity when it doesn’t matter just bolsters his credibility for when it does. If it’s a toss up and osu is involved, it’s unreasonable to expect him to overcome his bias.

They got exactly what they wanted and they knew what they were buying. And he’s good at what he does.
 
Really don't care to see Ohio State get it's ass kicked by Clemson again, and that's what would happen.
I don’t expect them to get in. And if they do, highly doubtful they’d win it all. But who knows. Every team has warts this year.
 
OSU would get in over Alabama because Alabama doesn't have any good wins. It's best win is LSU at 17, who lost to Troy. OSU with a win over Wisconsin would have #4 Wisconsin, #9 PSU, and #16 MSU. Committee has said in general it looks at best wins over the best/worst loss. OSU got in last year because it had 3 top 10 wins (OU, UW, UM).
We’ll see. But for now I’ll just assume your wrong.
 
Those guidelines are with "comparable teams
Again, not an Ohio State fan--I simply accepted we weren't comparable last year. You don't. That's fine but in this system the committee determines that. If we had a real playoff we wouldn't be complaining because we would have been included the last two years.
OK you have confirmed to me that you have NOT even read the criteria. Under the committee's own rules PSU and OSU are certainly comparable. Similar records and pedigree. To claim that PSU and OSU are not "comparable" is simply ludicrous.

Only conference champions should get into a playoff and ALL conference champions should be in. Ideally ncaa realigns to 8 conferences and then there is an 8 team playoff. No lucky losers like OSU last year or possibly Alabama this year. Winning championships should matter. No more eye tests. No more "comparable" bologna. No more twistable "rules" that aren't, just winners.

Winning always matters. PSU didn't win this year so they have no argument, just wait till next year.
 
That's fine...split FBS into two levels but unless that happens it has to be all inclusive or it's still a joke. 16 is simple...and easy

Not bad 78.. 230 likes! You have managed to fool alot of people here. Quite impressive. I mean, the board usually calls out trolls and puts them on ignore really quick. But for some odd reason you have managed to keep on rolling. I'm impressed with the troll job. Consider me a fan!
 
Herbie is nothing but a cockroach, always has and always will be. He will do anything to get the bucks in. Tha cfb will go down in smoke if they let those asses in
 
Anyone see this crap tonight?

Herbie pounding his chest for OSU to be in over 1 loss Bama. He says OSU is playing better this month (they did lose on November 4th to Iowa by 31) than Bama and OSU even with 2 losses, one being to a powerhouse in Oklahoma (said powerhouse beat OSU by 20 at the Shoe but loss to unranked Iowa St at home) should be in because they will have won conference championship.

Excuse me Herbie, but didn't you just sit on that panel last year and say PSU should not be in over OSU because they won on a fluke play and OSU was clearly better because they had only one loss despite losing to PSU head2head? So now, the shoe is on the other foot and Mr. Hypocrite is again using his media persuasion to influence Kirby who seems to agree this year with Herbie despite doing exactly the opposite last year.

Sorry, needed to vent, this just absolutely disgusts me. And to those who defend Herbie for being objective and defending PSU when he can, explain this then. The guy is nothing but a 2 faced homer hypocrite who has no business being in his position because he cannot be objective. It was like he wanted to cry when he saw OSU 8th and its the first thing he brought up when they turned to him.

What I find totally hilarious is when they do their picks at the end of College GameDay and Herbie passes on the ABC 8pm game because "he has the game" ... and has to be neutral. As if Herbstriet is not opinionated and biased. Everyone knows he is a schill for Ohio State so he lost his objectivity right there. So just go ahead and make the pick on the 8pm ABC game.
 
Let me make three points here, guys:

First, I posted a couple days ago that the fourth playoff spot would come down to an epic contest of blather and bullshit between the power of SEC propaganda (Alabama) and the forces of Godfather Jim Delany and his friends at ESPN (Ohio State). No, seriously. It’s right here on the record. And I furthermore predicted that the winner of that contest would be…<drum roll>…Ohio State. And I have no reason to change that prediction tonight.

Second, if I hear the word “resume” again, I’m going to freakin’ puke. It’s a catchword intended to suggest some sort of refined scientific judgment when the reality is politics.

Third, SweetRevenge, you’re an intelligent and articulate observer of the college football scene. However, all of your scholarly and “unbiased” analysis seems to run in favor of Ohio State, which is an odd thing.

I feel the same way about "eye test" and "culture". :mad:
 
I never wanted only conf champs. I wanted the 4 best teams. PSU was better than OSU last year, they beat them and won their division and won their conference.

And the point of this thread is to expose Herbie for the Homer Hypocrite he is because last year he sat on that panel and said exactly the opposite he is saying this year. Both years work in OSU favor.

Otherwise, lets say PSU only lost by 1 to OSU at the end of the game after leading for 58 minutes. Fluke win for OSU.
The fluke punt block!
 
That's fine...split FBS into two levels but unless that happens it has to be all inclusive or it's still a joke. 16 is simple...and easy
So if you don't include four teams that will never win a championship, did nothing during the season to earn a spot, played cupcakes week after week, then it's a joke....got it.
 
The whole problem with this system is the fans dont understand the rules. They cant understand because there is no consistency. The comittee put out criteria only to ignore it. They make up criteria on the spot. Somehow the made up criteria always seems to favor Ohio St.

If the comittee truly didnt talk about the #3 team in its rankings vs the #5 team last year thats a problem and it doesnt pass the eye, smell or any other test you want to throw at it.

This year Herbie wants the criteria to matter. He talked how confernce championship is the number one thing listed on the criteria and how much it should matter. Last year he didnt think it should matter at all.

I truly think the comittee doesnt want two teams from the same conference in. So Big 12 winner, Big Ten winner, ACC winner and SEC winner are going to get in. Last year their Big Ten winner was Ohio St. We didnt get in over Washington because they didnt want two Big Ten teams.
 
Why are you ignoring the quality wins Ohio State had last year and our bad losses when comparing them?

You're seeing bias because you aren't looking at it completely. Dig deeper. 2016 Ohio State resume was infinitely better than 2017 Alabama's resume....see the wins and the loss. You see bias because 2016 Penn State and 2017 Ohio State are comparable but the 1-loss teams weren't. Compare everything...please
OSU got destroyed twice this year - they no way deserve to be in the playoffs even if they beat Wisky. Bama will have 1 loss so based on how last year played out they should hands down be in over OSU but Herbie ever the hypocrite is working the other side of the street this year. We didnt deserve to be in last year and OSU doesn't deserve it this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grass
OSU would get in over Alabama because Alabama doesn't have any good wins. It's best win is LSU at 17, who lost to Troy. OSU with a win over Wisconsin would have #4 Wisconsin, #9 PSU, and #16 MSU. Committee has said in general it looks at best wins over the best/worst loss. OSU got in last year because it had 3 top 10 wins (OU, UW, UM).
Remind me of Washington's "good" wins last year - they make the rules up as they go which is BS.
 
one of the biggest stinks that hangs out there when you guys moan about not getting into the final 4 in 2016... you went onto lose your bowl game and didn't validate how great you thought you were.
 
one of the biggest stinks that hangs out there when you guys moan about not getting into the final 4 in 2016... you went onto lose your bowl game and didn't validate how great you thought you were.
Yes, because getting into an otherwise meaningless bowl has the same implications as playing in the first round of the playoffs. Oh yeah, and matchups don't matter, all opponents have equal strengths and weaknesses.
 
one of the biggest stinks that hangs out there when you guys moan about not getting into the final 4 in 2016... you went onto lose your bowl game and didn't validate how great you thought you were.

Probably would have scored a TD against Clemson though (OSU sure validated their selection by tossing up a goose egg in the CFP....SMH).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grass
one of the biggest stinks that hangs out there when you guys moan about not getting into the final 4 in 2016... you went onto lose your bowl game and didn't validate how great you thought you were.
Did you actually watch that bowl game, pitt fan who just registered here to say this?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT