Hey moderator: Did you delete the Michigan thread on all-time wins?

[Mudge1026]

I was reading a thread written up by a Michigan troll regarding UM having the most wins in College football history and was responding to Bushwood's excellent analysis of the UM win totals and how misleading the win totals are. It was so detailed and very fascinating so I replied to Bushwood complimenting him when I realized my response was not registered and an error message was displayed? I went back to the thread subject page and the thread was no longer there? What is going on? Who is messing with the thread?
Bushwood if you read this please re-post your excellent analysis of UM's win-loss record. Thanks.

 

[fairgambit]

I was reading a thread written up by a Michigan troll regarding UM having the most wins in College football history and was responding to Bushwood's excellent analysis of the UM win totals and how misleading the win totals are. It was so detailed and very fascinating so I replied to Bushwood complimenting him when I realized my response was not registered and an error message was displayed? I went back to the thread subject page and the thread was no longer there? What is going on? Who is messing with the thread?
Bushwood if you read this please re-post your excellent analysis of UM's win-loss record. Thanks.

The thread got dumped and while I agree the Bushwood analysis was good, it was a thread set up and continued by a troll. It was getting out of hand and deserved to go.

 

[Mudge1026]

Thanks for the explanation however the thread was very entertaining and made UM look bad which is not a bad thing by the way. Bushwood, I dont see why you could not re-post your analysis of the UM win-loss record, very educational. I would like to copy it so I can reference when arguing with arrogant UM fans, thanks.

 

[psu00]

Thanks for the explanation however the thread was very entertaining and made UM look bad which is not a bad thing by the way. Bushwood, I dont see why you could not re-post your analysis of the UM win-loss record, very educational. I would like to copy it so I can reference when arguing with arrogant UM fans, thanks.

I think that thread (which was started by a Mich troll) got swept aside after the same troll started like 4-5 other threads just to irritate posters here.

 

[Mudge1026]

My comment that never got posted is regarding the PSU-UM series, "And if it wasnt for the two ridiculous games, 2002 and 2005 where the refs clearly took the games away from PSU this head to head series would be close to dead even, and that was with Joepa being way past his prime".

"If we would have played in the 1970's and 80's the series would be lopsided in favor of PSU. UM was the most overrated team of that era, they just could not win big games unless it was in- conference, the time of the "Big two and little 8".

 

[Mudge1026]

The thread got dumped and while I agree the Bushwood analysis was good, it was a thread set up and continued by a troll. It was getting out of hand and deserved to go.

The irony of the thread is while trying to make PSU look bad it got turned around and made Michigan look bad. If your enemy is trying to destroy himself you get out of the way and let him do it.

 

[psu00]

My comment that never got posted is regarding the PSU-UM series, "And if it wasnt for the two ridiculous games, 2002 and 2005 where the refs clearly took the games away from PSU this head to head series would be close to dead even, and that was with Joepa being way past his prime".

"If we would have played in the 1970's and 80's the series would be lopsided in favor of PSU. UM was the most overrated team of that era, they just could not win big games unless it was in- conference, the time of the "Big two and little 8".

The big 10 was 7-19 in Rose Bowls from 1-1-70 until Penn State's win on 1-2-95. They were 1-10 in Rose Bowls from 1-1-70 to 1-1-80. Not a great conference then.

 

[GulfCoastLion]

My comment that never got posted is regarding the PSU-UM series, "And if it wasnt for the two ridiculous games, 2002 and 2005 where the refs clearly took the games away from PSU this head to head series would be close to dead even, and that was with Joepa being way past his prime".

"If we would have played in the 1970's and 80's the series would be lopsided in favor of PSU. UM was the most overrated team of that era, they just could not win big games unless it was in- conference, the time of the "Big two and little 8".

Woulda, coulda, shoulda, but completely agree. Penn State under JoePa would have had its way with scUM teams of that same era. Of course, PSU had its way with most every team of that era.

 

[TheGLOV]

I was reading a thread written up by a Michigan troll regarding UM having the most wins in College football history and was responding to Bushwood's excellent analysis of the UM win totals and how misleading the win totals are. It was so detailed and very fascinating so I replied to Bushwood complimenting him when I realized my response was not registered and an error message was displayed? I went back to the thread subject page and the thread was no longer there? What is going on? Who is messing with the thread?
Bushwood if you read this please re-post your excellent analysis of UM's win-loss record. Thanks.

It wasn't deleted. It was just locked due to inactivity!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

A stupid sheet said so!!

Lol!!!!!

 

[ChiTownLion]

My comment that never got posted is regarding the PSU-UM series, "And if it wasnt for the two ridiculous games, 2002 and 2005 where the refs clearly took the games away from PSU this head to head series would be close to dead even, and that was with Joepa being way past his prime".

"If we would have played in the 1970's and 80's the series would be lopsided in favor of PSU. UM was the most overrated team of that era, they just could not win big games unless it was in- conference, the time of the "Big two and little 8".

+ 1999.

 

[BobPSU92]

I missed the thread started by the um troll, but there is a huge asterisk next to um's win total. Years of dominance in a very weak conference, a lousy bowl record (against real competition), and just one national championship since 1948.