so they do it behind closed doors under the guise of 'protecting confidential information'...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...onducted-in-secret/ar-AAI8QuH?ocid=spartanntp
I ask you, which is more important: protecting the identity of the whistleblower, or letting the public decide if there's enough evidence to support the charges?
Heretofore Speaker Pelosi's approach is make a conclusion (i.e., Trump's guilty) and then find the evidence. Which wouldn't be so bad if we could witness it via public hearings. Until she brings an impeachment to a vote on the House floor Republicans have no voice. Democracy in action? I think not! It's another attempt at a coup. Can't beat Trump at the ballot box so let us usurp the will of the people. It cannot be interpreted any other way. Thank you.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...onducted-in-secret/ar-AAI8QuH?ocid=spartanntp
I ask you, which is more important: protecting the identity of the whistleblower, or letting the public decide if there's enough evidence to support the charges?
Heretofore Speaker Pelosi's approach is make a conclusion (i.e., Trump's guilty) and then find the evidence. Which wouldn't be so bad if we could witness it via public hearings. Until she brings an impeachment to a vote on the House floor Republicans have no voice. Democracy in action? I think not! It's another attempt at a coup. Can't beat Trump at the ballot box so let us usurp the will of the people. It cannot be interpreted any other way. Thank you.
