If you were there, was nardzi as cold as ice pregame meet with CJF?
- Thread starter emertmakeshiteup
- Start date
Anyone see Narduzzi’s PC? He was asked about the decision making on the goal line and his answers are hysterical. I always knew he was prick but never realized how stupid the guy is:
“We could have gone for it there and not gotten it,” Narduzzi said. “I thought if we kick a field goal there, it’s going to be a two-possession game. You need two scores [to win]. A field goal is a good play. Then you come back and score again.
You can go back, question the fourth and 1,” Narduzzi said. “Go for it, not go for it. If we go for it and we don’t get it, it’s like ‘why didn’t you kick the field goal, because you need two scores anyway to win the football game.’ That’s what it comes down to. You need two scores. We had three plays.”
Dude, did you go to elementary school? Your math is humiliating.
“We could have gone for it there and not gotten it,” Narduzzi said. “I thought if we kick a field goal there, it’s going to be a two-possession game. You need two scores [to win]. A field goal is a good play. Then you come back and score again.
You can go back, question the fourth and 1,” Narduzzi said. “Go for it, not go for it. If we go for it and we don’t get it, it’s like ‘why didn’t you kick the field goal, because you need two scores anyway to win the football game.’ That’s what it comes down to. You need two scores. We had three plays.”
Dude, did you go to elementary school? Your math is humiliating.
Narduzzi choked today. Thanks Pat.
Well, technically he is correct. Two scores needed to win in regulation (unless you go for two). Personally, I would have gone for it, knowing that PSU would be pinned deep if Pitt doesn’t convert, but what do I know. You can question Narduzzi’s strategy, but neither he nor his math were wrong. Grow up.
Not only was it an issue not going for it but Whippple’s playcalling down there sucked. Too cute. Just run your tailback.
You can do more than just question his strategy, his “strategy” was just wrong. He couldn’t call time out so he choked and blew it.
Even if you don’t get the TD you leave PSU on the 1 and likely get the ball back at midfield still only 1 score down.
But you only needed one score to tie? If they make the FG they’re still in the same position with :07 seconds to go. If he doesn’t get it on 4th, PSU is pinned back on their own one yard line and the offense is anemic. They probably would’ve started their final drive inside their opponent’s 50-yard line. He made a terrible decision - if Franklin/PSU pull that and lose, Franklin’s car would be lit on fire in the parking lot. That was one of the worst calls I have ever seen by a coach in college football or the pros.
No...he then could have gone for two and the win...so needed one score.
