....Mike McQueary's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ, when she wrote the "33rd SWIGJ Presentment" and Indictments. HERE IS A HOT-LINK TO THE ARTICLE. Another piece of information that we know existed in regards to this matter, that was unknown at the time this article was written because the OAG withheld the information from the public was the e-mail Mike McQueary sent to the OAG the week of 11/7/2011 outright stating that the "33rd SWIGJ" Presentment MISREPRESENTED what he had told 30th SWIGJ Grand Jurors (never said anything to 33rd SWIGJ Grand Jurors) about that night and what he told JVP (i.e., he told 30th SWIGJ Grand Jurors that he DID NOT see or eyewitness the sexual assault claimed by the OAG, did not IN FACT know for sure what was going on in the shower and could only speculate and conjecture about the possibilities of what was going on in the shower. Even then, when asked to assign a confidence level to his speculation - Mike McQueary confirmed that it was speculation and he didn't actually see it by stating he was only "relatively sure" that this is probably what was going on [the speculation portion of his testimony should have become irrelevant - once you state you are not an eyewitness, your speculation becomes hearsay and the factual testimony you gave is "circumstantial evidence" rather than the "direct evidence" of eyewitness testimony.]). In addition to all of this, we also know that a 30th SWIGJ Grand Juror has come out and confirmed Mike McQueary's Nov 2011 e-mail to the OAG that he testified to the diametric opposite of what the OAG claimed in their "33rd SWIGJ Presentment" and accompanying indictments - i.e., Mike McQueary told the 30th SWIGJ Grand Jurors that he DID NOT see or eyewitness the claimed sexual assault of the OAG, the DIAMETRIC OPPOSITE of how the OAG claimed MM testified in their 33rd SWIGJ Presentment and Indictments which INTENTIONALLY and FRAUDULENTLY misrepresented Mike McQueary's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ when presenting this as "evidence" to the "33rd SWIGJ" Grand Jurors who never even heard MM testify (i.e., "direct evidence" as they claimed MM testified to being an "eyewitness" when he testified to diametric opposite)!
Proof of this known lie by Kelly is contained right in this article and was even propagated in Kelly's circus-show Press Conference announcing the Presentment and Indictments:
This is an outright lie and fabrication, and it was intentionally perpetrated by the OAG to literally FABRICATE EVIDENCE that did not exist for the purpose of Maliciously Prosecuting multiple individuals -- it goes to the heart of the "probable cause" cited by the OAG for 100% of their Indictments against C/S/S. Here is what this "expert" has to say on the matter:
Key words in the statement being "evidence" and "....as long as it is sufficient to prove probable cause....". The state clearly intentionally fabricated and conjured FRAUDULENT PROBABLE CAUSE in regards to a ton of their Indictments including 100% of the Indictments against C/S/S as the OAG had NO "EVIDENCE" that Mike McQueary "saw" or "eyewitnessed" what they claimed (i.e., Kelly's claim of an "eyewitness report" of an anal-rape sexual assault made to JVP, Curley and Schultz!) AND IN FACT Mike McQueary's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ states the DIAMETRIC OPPOSITE of what the OAG claims in the Presentment and Indictments and that he DID NOT "see" or "eyewitness" the sexual assault claimed by the OAG and that he could only SPECULATE about the possibility of what was going on in the shower....McQueary also testified that this is what he did with everyone he spoke with at the time of the event - i.e., HE DID NOT TELL THEM THAT HE SAW AND EYEWITNESSED A CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT, but rather OBTUSELY CONJECTURED about what might have been going on based on the little he saw and heard NONE OF WHICH included "eyewitnessing" what the OAG claimed in their presentment! This account of MM's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ is FURTHER CONFIRMED by a 30th SWIGJ Grand Juror who subsequently spoke publicly about the matter and abjectly stated that Mike McQueary told the 30th SWIGJ that he DID NOT see or eyewitness what Kelly's "33rd SWIGJ Presentment" claims (Kelly didn't even PRESIDE OVER the 30th SWIGJ, Corbutt did as he was still the AG at the time!!!).
How is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania claiming it is even remotely legal, and not a massive violation of CONSTITUTIONALLY-GUARANTEED CITIZEN RIGHTS, to literally knowingly FABRICATE and CONJURE FRAUDULENT EVIDENCE within the SWIGJ Process via a corrupt OAG when this fabricated and conjured fraudulent "evidence" is the sole-source of "PROBABLE CAUSE" in support of the double-digit Indictments against 3 of the 4 individuals being charged?!?!?!? Especially when the "Probable Cause Evidence" - Mike McQueary's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ, not the 33rd, is ACTUALLY and FACTUALLY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that Mike McQueary never made a statement to anyone, including the PSU Admins, his father and Dr. Dranov, that he "eyewitnessed" or "saw" a criminal sexual assault and only ever OBTUSELY CONJECTURED about the possibility of such thing based on his experience that night. Conjecturing is the DIAMETRIC OPPOSITE of "eyewitnessing" and is not considered "DIRECT EVIDENCE" in a Court of Law! (i.e., the "Probable Cause" referenced in 100% of the C/S/S Indictments is an INTENTIONAL LIE by the OAG otherwise known as "Prosecutorial Misconduct".) Pennsylvania is a really phucked up place when C/S/S can be INDICTED using "Probable Cause Evidence" in the Indictment that is intentionally fabricated and knowingly FRAUDULENT whose sole purpose was to enable illegitimate Indictments and Malicious Prosecution, when both the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions have a prohibition against this behavior by "The State" and written GUARANTEE that this type of TYRANNY and behavior by "The State" will not be permitted to stand by "The Courts"?!?!?!
Proof of this known lie by Kelly is contained right in this article and was even propagated in Kelly's circus-show Press Conference announcing the Presentment and Indictments:
This is an outright lie and fabrication, and it was intentionally perpetrated by the OAG to literally FABRICATE EVIDENCE that did not exist for the purpose of Maliciously Prosecuting multiple individuals -- it goes to the heart of the "probable cause" cited by the OAG for 100% of their Indictments against C/S/S. Here is what this "expert" has to say on the matter:
Key words in the statement being "evidence" and "....as long as it is sufficient to prove probable cause....". The state clearly intentionally fabricated and conjured FRAUDULENT PROBABLE CAUSE in regards to a ton of their Indictments including 100% of the Indictments against C/S/S as the OAG had NO "EVIDENCE" that Mike McQueary "saw" or "eyewitnessed" what they claimed (i.e., Kelly's claim of an "eyewitness report" of an anal-rape sexual assault made to JVP, Curley and Schultz!) AND IN FACT Mike McQueary's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ states the DIAMETRIC OPPOSITE of what the OAG claims in the Presentment and Indictments and that he DID NOT "see" or "eyewitness" the sexual assault claimed by the OAG and that he could only SPECULATE about the possibility of what was going on in the shower....McQueary also testified that this is what he did with everyone he spoke with at the time of the event - i.e., HE DID NOT TELL THEM THAT HE SAW AND EYEWITNESSED A CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT, but rather OBTUSELY CONJECTURED about what might have been going on based on the little he saw and heard NONE OF WHICH included "eyewitnessing" what the OAG claimed in their presentment! This account of MM's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ is FURTHER CONFIRMED by a 30th SWIGJ Grand Juror who subsequently spoke publicly about the matter and abjectly stated that Mike McQueary told the 30th SWIGJ that he DID NOT see or eyewitness what Kelly's "33rd SWIGJ Presentment" claims (Kelly didn't even PRESIDE OVER the 30th SWIGJ, Corbutt did as he was still the AG at the time!!!).
How is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania claiming it is even remotely legal, and not a massive violation of CONSTITUTIONALLY-GUARANTEED CITIZEN RIGHTS, to literally knowingly FABRICATE and CONJURE FRAUDULENT EVIDENCE within the SWIGJ Process via a corrupt OAG when this fabricated and conjured fraudulent "evidence" is the sole-source of "PROBABLE CAUSE" in support of the double-digit Indictments against 3 of the 4 individuals being charged?!?!?!? Especially when the "Probable Cause Evidence" - Mike McQueary's testimony to the 30th SWIGJ, not the 33rd, is ACTUALLY and FACTUALLY EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE that Mike McQueary never made a statement to anyone, including the PSU Admins, his father and Dr. Dranov, that he "eyewitnessed" or "saw" a criminal sexual assault and only ever OBTUSELY CONJECTURED about the possibility of such thing based on his experience that night. Conjecturing is the DIAMETRIC OPPOSITE of "eyewitnessing" and is not considered "DIRECT EVIDENCE" in a Court of Law! (i.e., the "Probable Cause" referenced in 100% of the C/S/S Indictments is an INTENTIONAL LIE by the OAG otherwise known as "Prosecutorial Misconduct".) Pennsylvania is a really phucked up place when C/S/S can be INDICTED using "Probable Cause Evidence" in the Indictment that is intentionally fabricated and knowingly FRAUDULENT whose sole purpose was to enable illegitimate Indictments and Malicious Prosecution, when both the Pennsylvania and U.S. Constitutions have a prohibition against this behavior by "The State" and written GUARANTEE that this type of TYRANNY and behavior by "The State" will not be permitted to stand by "The Courts"?!?!?!
Last edited:
