i like this idea - courtesy of Carp (he may be an Iowa fan from other posts of his):
------------ snip
There is a way to fix this, but the Big Ten administrative powers won't do it.
Institute a system similar to English Premier League Soccer where there would be two divisions based on where teams finished the previous year (either matches or the tournament). Every year two teams are relegated (drop down) and two advance. This means that there is round robin among the top seven and among the bottom seven. Every team wrestles two matches out of their division. This insures that the best teams routinely wrestle each other. Attendance at these matches (and perhaps among the lower teams) will be enhanced. If, like Michigan State, the chances for advancement appear slim, there is an incentive to improve or, from the AD's point of view, fire the coach.
------------ snip
There is a way to fix this, but the Big Ten administrative powers won't do it.
Institute a system similar to English Premier League Soccer where there would be two divisions based on where teams finished the previous year (either matches or the tournament). Every year two teams are relegated (drop down) and two advance. This means that there is round robin among the top seven and among the bottom seven. Every team wrestles two matches out of their division. This insures that the best teams routinely wrestle each other. Attendance at these matches (and perhaps among the lower teams) will be enhanced. If, like Michigan State, the chances for advancement appear slim, there is an incentive to improve or, from the AD's point of view, fire the coach.