It is amazing that first games bring out the most long winded analysis and
- Thread starter Rip_E_2_Joe_PA
- Start date
Hey... I edited 27 sentences out of the original post....Yes, I agree and so are the posts about it.
🚬
Yep incredibly broad conclusions/predictions based on the smallest sample size possible.
Not amazing at all but quite expected.
Teams begin every year with new players, new schemes, strengths and weaknesses. Lots of questions.
Everyone watches the first game looking for answers to those questions. Especially in years in which we start with a decent opener like WVU, Purdue, or others.
Admittedly, making season long prognostications based on the opener are beyond reason. Teams change drastically as a season progresses, especially after the first game. But that’s human nature at it finest.
Teams begin every year with new players, new schemes, strengths and weaknesses. Lots of questions.
Everyone watches the first game looking for answers to those questions. Especially in years in which we start with a decent opener like WVU, Purdue, or others.
Admittedly, making season long prognostications based on the opener are beyond reason. Teams change drastically as a season progresses, especially after the first game. But that’s human nature at it finest.
Old Ted ... Reincarnated into the same Ole A$$hole with a different handle is one example.
