ADVERTISEMENT

Jerry Sandusky’s adopted son arrested for sexually assaulting a child

I think it's clear you are loving every second of this - says a lot about you and how much you claim to care about psu.
I would rather it to have never happened. I would rather Jerry not be a pedo and his son not be an accused pedo. I would rather have had Joe retire and die peacefully and not disgraced. But it is what it is and I didn't cause any of it. Your anger is displaced.
 
as predicted ziegler right on queue - he always finds a way to take bat sh!t crazy to a new level......

John: "We know no details, allegations appear to be 100% different/irrelevant from JS & apparent evidence of porn raises question of why none on JS"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stufftodo
as predicted ziegler right on queue - he always finds a way to take bat sh!t crazy to a new level......

John: "We know no details, allegations appear to be 100% different/irrelevant from JS & apparent evidence of porn raises question of why none on JS"

I don't know. This part seems pretty spot on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nellie R
Are you going to cry?? Here take this. . .

61250305_the-original-46mm-uk-shared-carton_3d_lr.jpg
So what exactly is your reason to be upset with me?
 
Talk about protesting to much - the more you post the more you indict yourself.

I would rather it to have never happened. I would rather Jerry not be a pedo and his son not be an accused pedo. I would rather have had Joe retire and die peacefully and not disgraced. But it is what it is and I didn't cause any of it. Your anger is displaced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pandaczar12
I guess I shouldn't differentiate, but I would place sending sexual texts to a teenage girl a bit below "sexually assaulting a child" in my hierarchy of criminal offenses. Guess I'm the crazy one.
I agree with you, Kevin. At this point, I'm just trying to make sure I understand exactly what criminal offenses Sandusky Jr. was charged with. They all sound bad to any reasonable person, but some are worse than others.

The Sandusky family is like poison ivy on steroids. Everything they touch suffers damage.
 
as predicted ziegler right on queue - he always finds a way to take bat sh!t crazy to a new level......

John: "We know no details, allegations appear to be 100% different/irrelevant from JS & apparent evidence of porn raises question of why none on JS"
He also correctly pointed out that Jeff is still dating the girl's mother.
 
  • Like
Reactions: francofan
On a related note to this subject, the amount of teenagers I have encountered at work that take/send/receive nude photos of themselves is staggering. I attended a professional development put on by the local head of the SVU unit who focuses on electronic crimes. He strongly urged us to get our children off of Snapchat.
 
Will Jeff cut a deal, flip, reverse course & implicate Jerry, maybe even Dottie? Confirm Matt's story.

Or will he triple down & stick to the plan?
 
Only on Planet BWI do we have the folks accusing posters who are upset at pedophilia to be the real pedophiles, and the ones questioning whether anything happened at all be considered "truth-seekers". It's a strange, upside-down planet that some here exist on.

There isn't one person on this board who isn't upset about pedophilia. You are trying to put people into groups that don't exist. There are some people who are saying they will wait for the charges to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt (if the texts are real this shouldn't too hard) before they pass judgement and I have no issue with that. I don't blame them for having that attitude given the revelations of how corrupt/broken the judicial system is in PA. The LE authorities in PA have lost credibility to many.

There are others who were trying to clarify exactly what Jeff was charged with and again, no issue with that either. It's beyond me how anyone could take offense to either of the two.

Anyone who has an issue with people waiting for due process before passing judgement or with folks trying to clarify what he was charged with seems like they are just trying to flame or troll IMO.
 
There isn't one person on this board who isn't upset about pedophilia. You are trying to put people into groups that don't exist. There are some people who are saying they will wait for the charges to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt (if the texts are real this shouldn't too hard) before they pass judgement and I have no issue with that. I don't blame them for having that attitude given the revelations of how corrupt/broken the judicial system is in PA. The LE authorities in PA have lost credibility to many.

There are others who were trying to clarify exactly what Jeff was charged with and again, no issue with that either. It's beyond me how anyone could take offense to either of the two.

Anyone who has an issue with people waiting for due process before passing judgement or with folks trying to clarify what he was charged with seems like they are just trying to flame or troll IMO.

Fooled me..
 
Will Jeff cut a deal, flip, reverse course & implicate Jerry, maybe even Dottie? Confirm Matt's story.

Or will he triple down & stick to the plan?

If Jeffrey was caught when Jerry was initially investigated and/or tried, then maybe this could be used for some leverage. I'm not sure what use he provides to the AG now.
 
I agree with you, Kevin. At this point, I'm just trying to make sure I understand exactly what criminal offenses Sandusky Jr. was charged with. They all sound bad to any reasonable person, but some are worse than others.

The Sandusky family is like poison ivy on steroids. Everything they touch suffers damage.
He was charged with statutory sexual assault. He allegedly had sex with a minor.
 
In a rational world, no it shouldn't. You been around the last 5+ years?

Considering none of this will come into evidence and is wholly unrelated, I'm not sure how this will impact the jury pool. If it does, then there will have to be another trial and new jurors.
 
On a related note to this subject, the amount of teenagers I have encountered at work that take/send/receive nude photos of themselves is staggering. I attended a professional development put on by the local head of the SVU unit who focuses on electronic crimes. He strongly urged us to get our children off of Snapchat.

Yeah, it is staggering. I work in the child protection field and we get reports involving inappropriate pictures taken by kids of themselves all the time. Those pictures end up everywhere.. If I had kids with phones, I'd disable their camera.
 
Only on Planet BWI do we have the folks accusing posters who are upset at pedophilia to be the real pedophiles, and the ones questioning whether anything happened at all be considered "truth-seekers". It's a strange, upside-down planet that some here exist on.
Maybe some of us have learned not to believe a single word that comes out of PA prosecution offices or the MSM.
 
Great..seeing his photo all over with the PSU logo right next to him...TMZ, local news...etc.
 
My reputation of accepting the fact that Jerry is a convicted serial pedophile?

No, your reputation for continuously commenting negatively on anything regarding Paterno.

Also, your lamenting have to "deal with" certain posters on these threads is ridiculous, as I posted before. There is no one forcing you to read this board or these threads. If you don't like dealing with it, then just stop. Got it??

Again, the above is why you're a fvcking idiot.
 
thankful for "ignore" feature, even though it does make one have to "fill in the blanks", it's not difficult to do
 
No, your reputation for continuously commenting negatively on anything regarding Paterno.

Also, your lamenting have to "deal with" certain posters on these threads is ridiculous, as I posted before. There is no one forcing you to read this board or these threads. If you don't like dealing with it, then just stop. Got it??

Again, the above is why you're a fvcking idiot.
What the hell does Joe Paterno have the do with this? I didn't even mention Joe.

What I hate is having people stick up for a convicted pedophile. It makes us (PSU Community) look bad.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT