Joe Biden Tax Evasion

bdgan

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2008
63,354
40,887
1
This country with the last two election shenanigans has now sadly entered the banana republic realm.
Libs used Covid to change election rules without legislative approval. Some states subsequently reined in the abuses but blue states like it the way it is. Mass mailed ballots with aggressive ballot harvesting and loose ID verification.

PA legislature tried but Wolf wouldn't go along. Now the have a democratic legislature so it's game over. Arizona had a chance but Katie Hobbs won which makes them a lost cause. Think about it. She refused to debate and she was in charge of state elections when she was a candidate.
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
Libs used Covid to change election rules without legislative approval. Some states subsequently reined in the abuses but blue states like it the way it is. Mass mailed ballots with aggressive ballot harvesting and loose ID verification.

PA legislature tried but Wolf wouldn't go along. Now the have a democratic legislature so it's game over. Arizona had a chance but Katie Hobbs won which makes them a lost cause. Think about it. She refused to debate and she was in charge of state elections when she was a candidate.
Cry me a river. Cons just can't understand their ideas are not in the majority. They got RvW broken up and it cost them at least a couple of races. The Repubs talked a lot about inflation and other issues but now after the elections they never talk about policy - Laptop laptop, laptop and lots of revenge investigations that will go no where.
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
well, I wasn't there to see it...but..according to recorded info, hunter talked about how to split money from one of his deals...during that recording he said he set aside 10% for the "big guy". In subsequent investigation, one of hunter's partners said that the "big guy" was Joe Biden.
So, I don't know whether in your world, that's proff, but it certainly warrants investigation.
You're into proof...have any proof that it didn't happen? Have any proof that the witness lied or was mistaken. You need to have proof/facts when making specific statements
Weak, very weak. Some one said something some where about a big guy. Try taking that to court - nothing but innuendo and third hand info - throw it all out and get some facts, not just hearsay.
 

bdgan

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2008
63,354
40,887
1
Cry me a river. Cons just can't understand their ideas are not in the majority. They got RvW broken up and it cost them at least a couple of races. The Repubs talked a lot about inflation and other issues but now after the elections they never talk about policy - Laptop laptop, laptop and lots of revenge investigations that will go no where.
I don't care for a lot of Republicans but a lot of what you said is false. For example, most Americans support voter ID and most Americans oppose late term abortions.
 

bdgan

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2008
63,354
40,887
1
Weak, very weak. Some one said something some where about a big guy. Try taking that to court - nothing but innuendo and third hand info - throw it all out and get some facts, not just hearsay.
It's not 3rd hand info/inuendo. It's documented in emails and confirmed by eyewitnesses.
 

KnightWhoSaysNit

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2010
9,960
11,097
1
Cry me a river. Cons just can't understand their ideas are not in the majority. They got RvW broken up and it cost them at least a couple of races. The Repubs talked a lot about inflation and other issues but now after the elections they never talk about policy - Laptop laptop, laptop and lots of revenge investigations that will go no where.

That's the best you got? "Cry me a river?"

"We have power. We control the media. We control law enforcement. We control your courts. We control access to evidence, and we're not going to change that access. Screw you. Cry me a river."

That's your vision for our "democracy."

Oh WE DO WANT TO TALK ABOUT POLICIES. We want spending cuts. We want some bureaucracies completely eliminated. We want clean voter rolls. We want the shackles removed from our energy industry. We want secure borders and secure elections.

WE DO WANT TO TALK ABOUT POLICIES. We just don't want YOUR POLICIES.

Your responses have been pathetic. You are approaching Ignore Status. Start answering the questions and adding some real content if you want a different end result to your posting here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Spin Meister

Bob2022

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2022
232
288
1
Libs used Covid to change election rules without legislative approval. Some states subsequently reined in the abuses but blue states like it the way it is. Mass mailed ballots with aggressive ballot harvesting and loose ID verification.

PA legislature tried but Wolf wouldn't go along. Now the have a democratic legislature so it's game over. Arizona had a chance but Katie Hobbs won which makes them a lost cause. Think about it. She refused to debate and she was in charge of state elections when she was a candidate.
How was it even allowed that she ran the elections when she was a candidate? Basically republicans who have jobs are afraid and have no stones.
 

junior1

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
7,317
8,237
1
Weak, very weak. Some one said something some where about a big guy. Try taking that to court - nothing but innuendo and third hand info - throw it all out and get some facts, not just hearsay.
you might not have been paying attention...the reference to payments to the "big guy" was stated in hunters laptop..now certified by CBS news..the big guy according to one of Hunter's partners Bobulinski (sic), who has been interviewed by numerous media, was Joe Biden. So, facts, not inuendo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Spin Meister

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
So you think all that money Biden got from Ukraine and China was properly reported on his tax return?
What proof do you have to support your allegations? Please provide us with all the details.
You won't but you will continue with inuendo and fiction.
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
you might not have been paying attention...the reference to payments to the "big guy" was stated in hunters laptop..now certified by CBS news..the big guy according to one of Hunter's partners Bobulinski (sic), who has been interviewed by numerous media, was Joe Biden. So, facts, not inuendo.
Provide a source (link). I don't buy what you are selling.
Refer to the movie 'Usual Suspects'. Everyone had heard of the 'bad guy'. Only problem the bad guy never existed.
 

JR4PSU

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2002
41,055
12,392
1
SE PA
What proof do you have to support your allegations? Please provide us with all the details.
You won't but you will continue with inuendo and fiction.
I’ll provide it after you provide your proof that DJT is a crook. You won’t, but you will continue with innuendo and fiction.

10% for the Big Guy, not withstanding.
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
I’ll provide it after you provide your proof that DJT is a crook. You won’t, but you will continue with innuendo and fiction.

10% for the Big Guy, not withstanding.
The tax fraud case in NY against the Trump Org - CFO, Controller, and Accts Pay Director have all pleaded guilty to tax fraud & evasion. They have also testified under oath that DJT approved the illegal payments.
 

KnightWhoSaysNit

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2010
9,960
11,097
1
The tax fraud case in NY against the Trump Org - CFO, Controller, and Accts Pay Director have all pleaded guilty to tax fraud & evasion. They have also testified under oath that DJT approved the illegal payments.

OK. Put them in jail. Now let's move on. Why is the Big Guy not being prosecuted?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainStabbin1

junior1

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
7,317
8,237
1
The tax fraud case in NY against the Trump Org - CFO, Controller, and Accts Pay Director have all pleaded guilty to tax fraud & evasion. They have also testified under oath that DJT approved the illegal payments.
so, did they say that trump approved the illegal payments or that trump approved the payments that were illegal? There is a difference. The CFO prepared the documents for trumps approval, it's entirely possible that trump approved them not knowing they were illegal.
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
so, did they say that trump approved the illegal payments or that trump approved the payments that were illegal? There is a difference. The CFO prepared the documents for trumps approval, it's entirely possible that trump approved them not knowing they were illegal.
He signed the checks and knew they were illegal - ignorance of the law is no excuse for criminal acts.
 

CaptainStabbin1

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Apr 4, 2014
7,065
3,554
1
I’ll say this about dementia Joe…………… If he were a regular citizen his corrupt ass would already be in prison for tax evasion to the tune of millions!
 

JR4PSU

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2002
41,055
12,392
1
SE PA
The tax fraud case in NY against the Trump Org - CFO, Controller, and Accts Pay Director have all pleaded guilty to tax fraud & evasion. They have also testified under oath that DJT approved the illegal payments.
Hunter Biden says “10% to the Big Guy”. That’s more damning than anything you said about Trump.
 

psuted

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Nov 26, 2010
28,911
25,468
1
The CFO, Controller, and other TRump organization officers have pleaded guilty to those tax evasion charges - that makes them real.
No it doesn’t.

But the illegal “pay to play” millions that Potato and his family got from hostile foreign governments was not declared. This treasonous and self serving criminal behavior was rampant as the Biden crime syndicate sold out America.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JR4PSU

psuted

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Nov 26, 2010
28,911
25,468
1
You can see how by looking at his tax returns and other public sources. The information is already there - just look it up and stop being duped with 'loaded questions ' and innuendo. Check your sources - I'm sure they have answers.
You’re being a Democrat apologist once again 2Lying.
 

CaptainStabbin1

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Apr 4, 2014
7,065
3,554
1
Good. Let's put Trump, and anyone else that evades taxes, in jail.

Now how about Biden? Explain to us how The Big Guy is someone other than Joe even though highly credible, first hand witness testimony claims that Joe is such? This goes way beyond tax evasion. It goes full on to the risk of subverting the interests of the USA to those of foreign governments, namely China and The Ukraine. Trump tried to expose this, and got impeached for it. That's an outrageous abuse of power on the part of Pelosi, Schiff, and other Democrats.

Or is justice only in one direction with you, the FBI, and the DOJ? They've been sitting on this issue for years. They are controlled by the Democratic Party.

You can't have justice for some and not others, especially when it involves political rivals but not your own politicians. That's as Banana Republic as it gets.

If you won't come clean on this then you are a hypocrite.

Throw his corrupt ass in jail for tax evasion, then nail him for treasonous acts while he’s sitting his corrupt ass in prison for tax evasion!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR4PSU and psuted

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
OK. Put them in jail. Now let's move on. Why is the Big Guy not being prosecuted?
Maybe he is not being prosecuted because there is no identified 'big guy' to prosecute. Maybe he was talking about ShaQ O'Neil. Hearsay is not really proof of anything.
 

2lion70

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jul 1, 2004
17,980
6,389
1
You’re being a Democrat apologist once again 2Lying.
Have you looked into those public tax returns. Has the IRS reviewed/audited them? No, you're just looking for a tit for a tat type situation with no proof to support your position.
 

KnightWhoSaysNit

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2010
9,960
11,097
1
Maybe he is not being prosecuted because there is no identified 'big guy' to prosecute. Maybe he was talking about ShaQ O'Neil. Hearsay is not really proof of anything.

The Bobulinsky Testimony is not hearsay. He is a first hand witness who is highly credible. He was one of the leads on the Biden Business team, now dubbed the Biden Crime Syndicate. He's even a Democrat. Bobulinsky would have every reason to hide the facts if it were not for his ethics. He puts love of country, and doing the right thing, above politics. He's a former naval officer and (I think) a graduate of our Naval Academy.

Some of us here support the conservative cause, but we are not biased when it comes to cold hard facts. The lefties here, like you, on the other hand, will do anything to attack your political opposition, to the point of denying what is factual. Mayorkas is a perfect example of a Dem -- "The border is secure."

This is why you earned the nickname 2Lying. You should come clean if you want to be credible.
 

psuted

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Nov 26, 2010
28,911
25,468
1
Have you looked into those public tax returns. Has the IRS reviewed/audited them? No, you're just looking for a tit for a tat type situation with no proof to support your position.
Yes, I’ve done a detailed review of public tax documents, and my source at the IRS audited them. Time to lock Biden and his crime syndicate up.
 

JR4PSU

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2002
41,055
12,392
1
SE PA
Serious question. WTF is wrong with you? You can't possibly be that naive.
He isn't naive. He's simply refusing to accept the obvious because of his political party.
You can see how by looking at his tax returns and other public sources. The information is already there - just look it up and stop being duped with 'loaded questions ' and innuendo. Check your sources - I'm sure they have answers.
Have you viewed his tax returns and other public sources? When you do, kindly get back to us.

BTW, you would have to look at every return while he was VP in order to track his money. A snapshot of one single year would not tell you the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob2022

bdgan

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2008
63,354
40,887
1
He isn't naive. He's simply refusing to accept the obvious because of his political party.

Have you viewed his tax returns and other public sources? When you do, kindly get back to us.

BTW, you would have to look at every return while he was VP in order to track his money. A snapshot of one single year would not tell you the story.
Joe's tax returns won't show income he doesn't report. That includes any payments Hunter paid on his behalf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptainStabbin1

junior1

Well-Known Member
May 29, 2001
7,317
8,237
1
He isn't naive. He's simply refusing to accept the obvious because of his political party.

Have you viewed his tax returns and other public sources? When you do, kindly get back to us.

BTW, you would have to look at every return while he was VP in order to track his money. A snapshot of one single year would not tell you the story.
and that assumes he declared all his income. If Hunter is/waspaying off his father's bills that wouldn't show up. If Hunter was putting the "big guy's" 10% is some hidden numbered account it likely wouldn't show up on Joe's tax forms
 
  • Like
Reactions: JR4PSU

KnightWhoSaysNit

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2010
9,960
11,097
1
and that assumes he declared all his income. If Hunter is/waspaying off his father's bills that wouldn't show up. If Hunter was putting the "big guy's" 10% is some hidden numbered account it likely wouldn't show up on Joe's tax forms

Dems are too thick to consider the obvious. It's why debates here tend to be a bit silly. You've got one side that simply cannot think, or refuses to think. They are just political hacks. Not here to get to the truth. They look for a soft spot, like Trump's antics, and then blow it up and out of proportion compared to what really concerns Americans. Then Americans, who don't really have the truth about much, vote Dem because they have been told that the other side is "bad."