Boy, I don't even know what to say to that, other than perhaps to refer you to the Scranton "Black Hand" thread elsewhere on the board.
Was it unjust when those guys got caught before Lance in some weird equitable sense? Sure (though I'm pretty confident that Floyd was stupid enough to get caught without any help from anyone else). But then, if a guy had a rep for one of his sponsors talk about taking a baseball bat to my wife's head, I'd be talking. Same as if I was a serious journalist and wrote a serious piece about doping, and got treated to nine years of libel litigation. Or if I was a decent clean rider of moderate talent who found myself with an opportunity to get in a breakaway, only to be "joined" in that break by Lance, thereby dooming its chances, until I slinked back to the peloton. Or maybe if I was a guy of tremendous talent, who could no longer keep up with a doped peloton and got mocked and prosecuted in the process, that is, if I hadn't offed myself first.
Lance is the posterboy for that age old question: an evil person who does some good, or a good person who does some evil? I am firmly in the former camp. Perhaps he's changed a bit - I'm not really in a position to judge that today, but in my experience fundamental changes at the core are pretty rare indeed.