ADVERTISEMENT

Kentucky Derby winner fails drug test

Testing in high-level soccer/football/futbol/calcio has been and is a joke. Shouldn’t be surprising that while some of the best doping doctors were setting up shop in Spain and hooking up bike riders, the Spanish National Team - which has always been good, but overrated - became a true powerhouse. Blood doping and EPO lend themselves well to having the endurance to run your socks off for 90 minutes
as well as the ability to recover and do it again the next day.

But...90 minutes? Try 360.
 
It looks like Bob Baffert is in some trouble. Medina Spirit, has failed a drug test and its Hall of Fame trainer Bob Baffert has been indefinitely suspended from Churchill Downs, officials said Sunday.

In a news conference Sunday morning, Baffert said the winning horse tested positive for 21 picograms of betamethasone, 11 picograms above the legal limit in Kentucky racing. Shortly after, Churchill Downs, who hosts the Derby, announced his suspension.
So this won’t effect the betters who won or lost money as a result of these shenanigans, but the purse for the winner will be withheld from the Medina Spirit owners. Maybe now the press will stop gushing over Baffert, and the horse will not be running in the Preakness. Horse racing is a very crooked sport and this certainly tarnishes all the fancy hats and bourbon aura.
Been that way for a while. Best trainers equals best chemist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany Ned2
They did have a guy on our local radio station (with a scientific background) who noted that the amount/concentration in question is equivalent to a grain of salt in an Olympic sized swimming pool. BTW, a picogram is very small. A picogram is 10 to the -12th power: 0.0000000000001 (or one trillionth of a gram), and a gram is .035 of an ounce. It's amazing it's even detectable in those amounts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cment
I’m amazed a horse would even know to take certain drugs to improve performance. In some ways, they’re very smart animals. Sad though. Where were the parents?
Dad was probably hanging around a breeding shed and mom was probably knocked up by yet another father and too busy with her own troubles to care.
 
Something that I have been questioning from the beginning even before this news broke, why would Baffert have his best jockey riding on the a complete long shot not one of the more favorite horses he had running in the race? Doesn't add up to me...
Velazquez rode him in his last two races, and is one of the best in the business. I would have been surprised if Baffert had gone elsewhere.
 
Medina Spirit was the only Baffert horse in the Derby. Most people had a horse of his called "Life is Good" pencilled in as the major player until he came up with an ankle chip before the Santa Anita Derby and was scratched from that as well as the KY Derby. Life is Good was undefeated, three wins in three starts having just won the San Felipe, G2 stakes race at Santa Anita under who? Mike Smith.
 
Translation: He's keeping all of his defenses open. And I'm sure that defense cascade has been well outlined. In fact, we've really heard all of these defenses in the context of other sports when you come to think about it:
1. Cycling - it wasnt on the prohibited list at the time.
2. Baseball - testosterone would never enhance baseball performance (set aside recovery)
3. Many sports - I must have ingested a contaminated supplement by accident.

At this point, honestly, I get that he probably has to say something given who he is and with the preakness this week, but I'm surprised he hasn't first bitched about the "leaking" of the A sample result before the B sample was tested for confirmation (again, the usual playbook).

What's sort of interesting about this is, as legalized gambling becomes an increasingly significant part of our economy (and I have to imagine that the gambling 'bump' associated with the Derby day is wildly significant to the racing industry), one would think that the gambling companies and state ag's (consumer protection) might start to take a greater interest in antidoping as a "symbol" of their commitment to the integrity of the model, particularly given states' (increasingly pathetic) reliance on that model for revenue.
And Footbal, So and So tested positive. See you in three weeks, let's never speak of this again.
 
So I see Baffert has just announced that the horse had in fact received a product (Otamax) containing the steroid. It’s listed right on the label in big print as an api. So now the defense is “new/recent rule” that is “too strict” and the drug provided “no benefit”.
 
Correct.

Just ask Mr "Fancy-pants" Lance Armstrong. He and his Dr never failed a drug test but it didn't mean he wasn't doping.
Others were doping in that era, too, but Armstrong was better at it, just as he was better at riding. His crime wasn't so much doping, but more the way he doubled down lying about it. That, and not being French.

This isn't Baffert's first time with a doping issue. Justify failed a drug test after the Santa Anita Derby, but was allowed to run the Triple Crown. I think the California officials felt the banned substance was from the horse's feed as there were other horses in other barns that also tested positive. More recently he was suspended 15 days in Arkansas for 2 positive tests but successfully appealed it.
 
Others were doping in that era, too, but Armstrong was better at it, just as he was better at riding. His crime wasn't so much doping, but more the way he doubled down lying about it. That, and not being French.
...not just lying about it, being an absolutely vicious prick to anyone who even thought about challenging him. That's really his unforgiveable offense in my book. You're right - everybody was doping in his era, and he did stuff that really did capture the imagination at a competitive level (eg, his "cyclocross" run down the mountain after avoiding the Beloki crash at Le Rochette, "the look," and his attack after the handlebar musette crash).
 
Last edited:
If this was the first time then I would give him a pass. He’s had at least 30 different cases of some form of drugging and always gets his hands slapped. His filly last year tested positive for the same drug at approximately the same level. Someone on his team has been injecting this well within the 14 day allowable window. Based upon the kinetics of the drug probably 3-4 days prior to race after a workout to help with inflammation. If it was outside the 14 days the detectable levels would be below approved levels. Do I think horse won because of this not really. But it surely didn’t hurt.
It’s nearly impossible, to race a horse without injecting them with anti-inflammatory drugs. The drug is not intended to build muscle or improve endurance, it simply allows the horse to run and not be in any kind of discomfort. In 2012 Doug O’Neil had a super colt named “I’ll Have Another”. He won the Kentucky Derby and Preakness in dramatic fashion and was considered a heavy favorite going into the Belmont Stakes. The NYRA forced O’Neil to divulge medical records which showed that the horse had early stages of osteoarthritis. O’Neil
argued that the horse was going to be retired after the Belmont, however, if he was to run he would need to be injected with an anti-inflammatory drug and synthetic joint fluid in both front knees. The NYRA said no and O’Neil scratched the horse. Doug O’Neil said there was no doubt in his mind that the colt could have run without any issue whatsoever. The owner J. P. Reddam was offered 10 million for breeding right options, if he ran in the Belmont and won the TC he would have been offered 100 million.
 
Last edited:
...not just lying about it, being an absolutey vicious prick to anyone who even thought about challenging him. That's really his unforgiveable offense in my book. You're right - everybody was doping in his era, and he did stuff that really did capture the imagination at a competitive level (eg, his "cyclocross" run down the mountain after avoiding the Beloki crash at Le Rochette, "the look," and his attack after the handlebar musette crash).
I don't view that as a greater offense. When Frankie Andreau is caught doping his move was what about Lance. When Landis gets caught it was what about Lance. All those guys were doping and turning on the biggest star to help your case is really chicken$h!t in my book. You did the crime do the time don't implicate others.
 
I don't view that as a greater offense. When Frankie Andreau is caught doping his move was what about Lance. When Landis gets caught it was what about Lance. All those guys were doping and turning on the biggest star to help your case is really chicken$h!t in my book. You did the crime do the time don't implicate others.
Boy, I don't even know what to say to that, other than perhaps to refer you to the Scranton "Black Hand" thread elsewhere on the board.

Was it unjust when those guys got caught before Lance in some weird equitable sense? Sure (though I'm pretty confident that Floyd was stupid enough to get caught without any help from anyone else). But then, if a guy had a rep for one of his sponsors talk about taking a baseball bat to my wife's head, I'd be talking. Same as if I was a serious journalist and wrote a serious piece about doping, and got treated to nine years of libel litigation. Or if I was a decent clean rider of moderate talent who found myself with an opportunity to get in a breakaway, only to be "joined" in that break by Lance, thereby dooming its chances, until I slinked back to the peloton. Or maybe if I was a guy of tremendous talent, who could no longer keep up with a doped peloton and got mocked and prosecuted in the process, that is, if I hadn't offed myself first.

Lance is the posterboy for that age old question: an evil person who does some good, or a good person who does some evil? I am firmly in the former camp. Perhaps he's changed a bit - I'm not really in a position to judge that today, but in my experience fundamental changes at the core are pretty rare indeed.
 
Last edited:
Boy, I don't even know what to say to that, other than perhaps to refer you to the Scranton "Black Hand" thread elsewhere on the board.

Was it unjust when those guys got caught before Lance in some weird equitable sense? Sure (though I'm pretty confident that Floyd was stupid enough to get caught without any help from anyone else). But then, if a guy had a rep for one of his sponsors talk about taking a baseball bat to my wife's head, I'd be talking. Same as if I was a serious journalist and wrote a serious piece about doping, and got treated to nine years of libel litigation. Or if I was a decent clean rider of moderate talent who found myself with an opportunity to get in a breakaway, only to be "joined" in that break by Lance, thereby dooming its chances, until I slinked back to the peloton. Or maybe if I was a guy of tremendous talent, who could no longer keep up with a doped peloton and got mocked and prosecuted in the process, that is, if I hadn't offed myself first.

Lance is the posterboy for that age old question: an evil person who does some good, or a good person who does some evil? I am firmly in the former camp. Perhaps he's changed a bit - I'm not really in a position to judge that today, but in my experience fundamental changes at the core are pretty rare indeed.
I don't believe that in that time or now that any riders are clean. It is nearly impossible for a grand tour rider to take the punishment that these guys take without help. To me they were all equally evil. When the money was gone for those who got caught used the fame of Lance Armstrong to try to get themselves paid. There are no "good guys" in the doping story. It was just like the guys that turned in the Astros but only after they left. They claimed they were tortured by the deceit but only said something after it benefitted their situation.

I just can't give someone redemption for doing the right thing only when it benefits them. If you are doing the right thing at your own peril then you are doing something noble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WaylonJ
Last edited:
Changed his story 3 times and he’s good to go! Nothing to see here! 34th time his horses have been caught over the limit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WaylonJ
Changed his story 3 times and he’s good to go! Nothing to see here! 34th time his horses have been caught over the limit?
He rides the edge of legality, like many do. Most people don't bet or follow the horse game until the big races. He's not the only one but you win the big one, stand by for whatever scrutiny.

Not to bring this up but I will... Baff has so much flesh in the game that certain places can't run without guys like him and a few others. Yes the game is crooked. I don't know about picograms of whatever drug and probably neither does he. He has a general grasp. He has a million asst trainers do this. He wins shit tons of money on races the average person knows nothing about. In short, guys like him run the game, not the other way around. I don't like the guy but who cares what I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
Medina will run in Preak.

yeah, I didn't see any indemnity commitment by Baffert in his agreement.
 
He rides the edge of legality, like many do. Most people don't bet or follow the horse game until the big races. He's not the only one but you win the big one, stand by for whatever scrutiny.

Not to bring this up but I will... Baff has so much flesh in the game that certain places can't run without guys like him and a few others. Yes the game is crooked. I don't know about picograms of whatever drug and probably neither does he. He has a general grasp. He has a million asst trainers do this. He wins shit tons of money on races the average person knows nothing about. In short, guys like him run the game, not the other way around. I don't like the guy but who cares what I think.
It’s rough though, that horse had an advantage, it might have been minute, but it did. I don’t really care about horse racing, but you got to think about the second place guys. State college lost in the little league World Series to danny almontes team. Yeah a year later the 12 year olds get their medals, but they didn’t get to play on tv because they got trounced by a kid who drove the team bus to Williamsport.
 
Just in, Medina Spirit will run in the Preakness. He draws post 3 which is a big advantage. A win here and Belmont Park will be electric. Baffert entered another one of his prized pupils, Concert Tour with HOF jockey Mike Smith. Don’t underestimate Concert Tour, he’s a live horse with fresh legs and will most likely be the odds on favorite at post time. This should be a two horse race but I’ll give Crowded Trade a punchers chance. It looks like D. Wayne Lucas entered a horse named Ram with impeccable breeding @ 30-1 which may be a great Show bet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairgambit
Go drop whatever you want on whatever horse you want. People get all riled up about cheating or whatever....they hold back, they dope, they scratch out of bad situations or whatnot. Bet it or don't bet it. Nobody has any pressure on you.

Somebody has to win and it's not always the favorite. Go for it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT