"Michigan and Ohio State fans are analyzing the hell out of that controversial play"
Last edited:
Well, I don't like either program, but I am glad that it was controversial as at least one of them can feel the pain of a bad/controversial referee decision deciding the game. In Michigan, at least it was a judgement call where as in the added time to the clock and heel toe were both wrong calls not controversial.
Michigan and Ohio State fans are analyzing the hell out of that controversial play
It was clearly a first down. Not much to analyze.
Yeah...some of those screen shots are a joke. You have the one where his head ls clearly across the 20 and the other where it is behind it....well if you don't show where his progress is of course it looks short.It was clearly a first down. Not much to analyze.
Yeah, Michigan fans have no room to complain IMO. Well, at least the ones that would always tell Penn State fans (after another critical call in our games) the same 4 lines-
1. You shouldn't leave the game in the hands of the refs.
2. Good teams overcome bad calls.
3. Bad calls always even out in the end.
4. Get the tin foil hats out to complain about the refs.
I'm guessing many Michigan fans aren't real big proponents of those sayings today.
For what's it's worth I thought the 4th down play was a first down but very, very close. No matter which way it was ruled on the field, replay would not have overturned it.
Yeah...some of those screen shots are a joke. You have the one where his head ls clearly across the 20 and the other where it is behind it....well if you don't show where his progress is of course it looks short.
Yeah...that isn't what lost UM that game. Turnovers lost that game, but crying about officiating is what losers do.If you use the "maximum" forward progress which the runner is entitled to, not only is his head well across the yard-line to gain, but so is most of his upper-body.
The "controversy" appears to be:Hey this is fun to watch and listen to, especially when you think of all the times PSU was on the wrong end of unfair calls that benefitted these two teams! I, for one, am enjoying this a lot!!!
How rich is it for the Mich Alum twitter account to ask if it's a conflict of interest for the ref to be from Ohio. Imagine how they'd act if they actually got screwed like, oh, I dont know, us a dozen times against those two teams.
Yeah...that isn't what lost UM that game. Turnovers lost that game, but crying about officiating is what losers do.
If you use the "maximum" forward progress which the runner is entitled to, not only is his head well across the yard-line to gain, but so is most of his upper-body.
"Michigan and Ohio State fans are analyzing the hell out of that controversial play"
You do know it is not where his head is, it is the forward progress of THE BALL.