Context always helps. First, the Flo P4P rankings after the NCAAs are available at
THIS LINK.
Second, you need to keep in mind what their previous P4P ranking was, before NCAAs. Here's the OP's list, with the previous ranking included:
1. Kyle Snyder - (1)
2. Zain - (2)
3. Nolf - (4)
4. Nickal - (10)
5. IMar - (3)
6. Heil - (9)
7. Cenzo - (NR)
8. Hall - (NR)
9. NaTo - (7)
10. Massa - (12)
Cenzo and Hall moving into the top (and 10 & 11 if Seniors are not removed), is pretty remarkable when they were not ranked (i.e., not in the top 20) before NCAAs.
My take on some of the issues raised in the thread:
1. Zain should be ahead of Snyder
- I don't think there's a lot of separation between the two. That said, during the regular season Zain had his 9-8 (TB-2) win over Sorensen, and his 2-1 win over Collica in the National Duals. By contrast, Snyder's only decisions were at B1Gs to Kroells (14-7) and Medbery (8-5) and to the same two guys at NCAAs (13-7 over Kroells and 6-3 over Medbery in the final). While Zain TFed or pinned everyone he faced at NCAAs, I'm not sure that is enough to move him from 2nd to 1st, and after the two regular season matches I listed above, I would have had Zain 2nd in P4P.
2. Cenzo should be ahead of IMar
- that's a tough one. IMar defeated Cenzo two times during the season (dual and B1G semis). Cenzo also lost to Isaac Jordan during the regular season (revenged that with a 5-2 victory in the 3rd/4th match at B1Gs) and to Keaton Subjeck (Stanford) during the regular season (revenged that with a 5-1 victory at NCAAs). By contrast, IMar was undefeated during the regular season. Based on their respective records, IMar was ranked #3 in the P4P pre-NCAAs, while Cenzo was not ranked. In the Flo final rankings at 165, Joseph is #1 and IMar is #2. The P4P is less based on what have you done lately, and more based on body of work, and in that case I think that IMar ranked higher than Cenzo is justifiable.