Roar, is this what is used to name the 29 allotted spots?
So he and Nevills need to find the same tournament?6 heavies with RPI. According to Willie, Coon is 3 matches short. Michigan has 2 duals left: 2/12 vs. Purdue, and the TBD opponent in Rec Hall.
6 heavies with RPI. According to Willie, Coon is 3 matches short. Michigan has 2 duals left: 2/12 vs. Purdue, and the TBD opponent in Rec Hall.
No. His win percent is surely good enough to qualify him. Won't need an RPI.So he and Nevills need to find the same tournament?
Roar, is this what is used to name the 29 allotted spots?
Not Roar, but I'll answer. The data at the link is a good chunk of what is use to name the allocations.
Here's a description of last year's process:
"Each qualifying tournament was awarded spots per weight class based on current year data. Each wrestler was measured on the following: Division I winning percentage at the weight class, rating percentage index (RPI) and coaches ranking.
For each wrestler that reached the threshold in at least two of the three categories, his qualifying tournament was awarded a qualifying spot in that weight class. Each qualifying tournament, with automatic qualifying status, was awarded a minimum of one wrestler per weight class, which will go to the tournament champion, even if they did not have any wrestlers reach at least two of the three thresholds. NCAA tournament spots for each qualifying event will be awarded at the tournament based solely on place-finish.
After all of the qualifying events have concluded, the NCAA Division I Wrestling Committee will meet in-person to select the remaining 70 at-large qualifiers, which will be announced on March 11. All weight classes will consist of 33 wrestlers. The at-large selections will be made based on the following criteria: head-to-head competition, qualifying event placement, quality wins, results against common opponents, winning percentage, RPI, coaches ranking and the number of matches contested at that weight class."
So is Coon short on the RPI? Nevills will be short on all three? How many is needed for an at large?matches at conference tourney don't count.
the entire premise of the formula is to set allocations BEFORE the conference tournament.
to secure an allocation for your conference at your weight, you need to hit 2 of these 3 thresholds
1) Top 33 Coaches Ranking (5 match minimum)
2) Top 33 RPI (17 match minimum)
3) Winning Percentage (8 match minimum)
So is Coon short on the RPI? Nevills will be short on all three? How many is needed for an at large?
Ha! It's not nearly as bad as it looks. With only 4 at-large selections per weight class, many will be obvious.I may have to get out my slide rule to figure this out. Right now my head hurts.
So is there a minimum number of matches to reach bronze?Bronze Standard is an entirely different animal. It includes the 3 metrics used for Gold and Silver Standard, but adds others, as follows...
Wrestlers in each weight class will receive an updated Win %, RPI and coaches’ ranking that includes all
competition through the qualifying events. Wrestlers who meet or exceed any two of the following criteria will be labeled “Bronze Standard”:
●● .700 Win %
●● Top 33 RPI
●● Top 33 CR
●● .700 winning percentage against all competition
●● One win against a wrestler receiving automatic qualification via an earned position (pre-allocated)
●● Qualifying event placement one below automatic qualification
Only Bronze Standard wrestlers will be eligible for selection as at-large qualifiers. A wrestler must have participated in his respective conference or regional qualifying tournament in order to be considered for at-large selection to the championships. The NCAA Wrestling Committee will use the following weighted criteria, in priority order, to evaluate the Bronze Standard wrestlers:
●● Head-to-head competition —25 percent
●● Quality wins —20 percent
●● Results against common opponents —10 percent
●● RPI —10 percent
●● Qualifying event placement —10 percent
●● CR —10 percent
●● Win % —10 percent
●● Number of matches contested at that weight class —5 percent
Win%, Coaches Ranking and RPI are recalculated after the conference tournaments, but the rules are the same, 8 matches for Win %, 5 for CR, and 17 for RPI.So is there a minimum number of matches to reach bronze?
So, if Nevills only has 6 matches after B1Gs and finishes one spot below automatically qualifying, he would still meet Bronze Standard if one of his wins comes against a wrestler who receives automatic qualification, right? Even if he does not have a Coaches ranking or enough bouts to earn Win%?Win%, Coaches Ranking and RPI are recalculated after the conference tournaments, but the rules are the same, 8 matches for Win %, 5 for CR, and 17 for RPI.
So, the answer to your question is "no", but it's really hard for a wrestler with less than 8 bouts to be considered for at-large since the win % ranking, and RPI rating contribution to their Bronze Standard status is 0. Possible, I suppose, given the right circumstances, but not likely.
So, if Nevills only has 6 matches after B1Gs and finishes one spot below automatically qualifying, he would still meet Bronze Standard if one of his wins comes against a wrestler who receives automatic qualification, right? Even if he does not have a Coaches ranking or enough bouts to earn Win%?
Even if Nick does reach Bronze.....you can plan on a maximum of 3 at large bids available because Snyder will be taking one of them, effectively, by knocking out an automatic qualifier who will most assuredly be ahead of Nevills when selections are made. An upset or two will happen in the other conference tournaments leading to a similar situation.
The bottom line: If Nick wrestles, we need him to win his way in because he's barely breathing otherwise. If he didn't wrestle his way in, then his record isn't going to look very good either by placing below 6th at minimum or less depending upon our allocations at HWT. It should be 8 if all wrestlers are healthy. If he couldn't place there, how would he be viewed for an At Large.....really.....