Arctic sea ice extent is "normal" lol.
LOL - Rumble is so ignorant regarding Science and history, he is easily duped by anti-Science Climate Eco-Loons.
=========
NSIDC Demonstrates How To Construct An Arctic Ice Scam
The National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado has demonstrated how to construct an Arctic ice scam.
The key feature of the scam
is a graph like the one below,
which necessarily starts in the Arctic record cold year of 1979, and appears to show a linear loss of sea ice headed towards zero.
What you would not
want to do is
include the 1990 IPCC/NOAA Arctic sea ice data
which shows that 1979 was a peak,
and that 1974 had about 1.8 million km² less ice than 1979.
that would wreck your linear trend scam.
You would also not want to include this 1971 National Geographic map showing ice extent not terribly different from 2015.
The composite map below shows that
Providing that information would completely destroy your linear trend scam and imaginary relationship with atmospheric CO2.
Another thing you most certainly not want to mention is that
the low ice extent of 1971
was 1.5 million km² higher
than earlier years.
That would further wreck your scam.
TimesMachine: May 21, 1975 – NYTimes.com
If you were serious about destroying your multi-million dollar funding scam, you would
mention that sea ice was
no thicker in 1940 than it is now.
23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…
And you could bury your scam
by showing that
behavior of Arctic sea ice
is cyclical rather than linear.
Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC
Keeping millions of dollars of climate scam money coming in requires lots of hard work cherry picking and ignoring reality.
The National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado has demonstrated how to construct an Arctic ice scam.
The key feature of the scam
is a graph like the one below,
which necessarily starts in the Arctic record cold year of 1979, and appears to show a linear loss of sea ice headed towards zero.
What you would not
want to do is
include the 1990 IPCC/NOAA Arctic sea ice data
which shows that 1979 was a peak,
and that 1974 had about 1.8 million km² less ice than 1979.
that would wreck your linear trend scam.
You would also not want to include this 1971 National Geographic map showing ice extent not terribly different from 2015.
The composite map below shows that
ice extent in 1971 (brown)
was much less than
September, 1979 ice extent.
It also shows that 1971 ice was much less than the NSIDC median (pink line.) was much less than
September, 1979 ice extent.
Providing that information would completely destroy your linear trend scam and imaginary relationship with atmospheric CO2.
Another thing you most certainly not want to mention is that
the low ice extent of 1971
was 1.5 million km² higher
than earlier years.
That would further wreck your scam.
TimesMachine: May 21, 1975 – NYTimes.com
If you were serious about destroying your multi-million dollar funding scam, you would
mention that sea ice was
no thicker in 1940 than it is now.
23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…
And you could bury your scam
by showing that
behavior of Arctic sea ice
is cyclical rather than linear.
Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC
Keeping millions of dollars of climate scam money coming in requires lots of hard work cherry picking and ignoring reality.
Last edited:
