2 conference losses?????amazing what a week can do.....
last saturday afternoon twitter banter had tO$U as potentially the greatest team/dual team ever.....and....now
they have 2 conference loses and questions abound with their lineup
#ilovethissport
2 conference losses?????
Yea, this is factually incorrect.amazing what a week can do.....
last saturday afternoon twitter banter had tO$U as potentially the greatest team/dual team ever.....and....now
they have 2 conference loses and questions abound with their lineup
#ilovethissport
18-15 tosu
Pletcher probably just put himself in Gross' half of the bracket. Will likely cement that at B10s, not seeing him beating Micic there either.Looking at rankings / seeds.
2 Pletcher lost to 5 Micic
5 M Jordan lost to 7 Pantaleo
3 BoJo lost to 6 Amine
1 Superman lost to 2 Coon
There’s basically no difference in 1/2 seeds at heavyweight, because no one is touching either Coon or Snyder.
But there will be some shifting in the other three classes.
18-15 tosu
and sometimes when you lose, you actually winSometimes when you win, you actually lose
So you're saying if BoJo wins B10s, then Hall gets the 3 anyway? Kutler gets it?No way BoJo gets a 3rd seed after tonight. Just won't have enough quality wins.
So you're saying if BoJo wins B10s, then Hall gets the 3 anyway? Kutler gets it?
You're probably right but I just don't have that confidence in the seeding committee. They sometimes overvalue winning the conference tourney, esp. B10s.I would bet Hall gets it.
18-15 tosu
Or he could have just sank a good half and see if Micah could have fought it off for 2 and a half minutes.If Pantaleo knew how to actually use a cradle, Michigan would have won this dual ...
Fans will never be happy with seeds at NCAA's, just speaking generally after reading/hearing comments for decades. Granted there's a few crazy, unexplainable seeds, but they do a fair job with a tough task.You're probably right but I just don't have that confidence in the seeding committee. They sometimes overvalue winning the conference tourney, esp. B10s.
So the moral of the story is......duals do matter! Go figure!Fans will never be happy with seeds at NCAA's, just speaking generally after reading/hearing comments for decades. Granted there's a few crazy, unexplainable seeds, but they do a fair job with a tough task.
One example, which does not a trend make, of the value placed on the Conference Tournament, is the 2011 B1G's and NCAA's. Q was seeded 8th at B1G's, with Rutt, Steinhaus, Gambrall, Hinton, Dallago, Kissell, and Magram (in order 1-7) seeded ahead of him. On the way to the conference title, he beat Rutt, Steinhaus and Dallago.
To show the "body-of-work", AND the conference tourney emphasis, Q had a mixture of both. He passed 5 of the 7 guys seeded higher at B1G's, but ended up lower than Rutt and Steinhaus, who had much better bodies-of-work. I thought his #9 seed at NCAA's was fair. He was behind Honeycutt, Hamlin, Bosak, Rutt, LeBlanc, Loder, Perry, and Steinhaus (in order, 1-8) that year...and won it all. Losses during the regular season to Hamlin, Scheidel, Gambrall, Dallago, Steinhaus, and Rutt, sealed his fate for a higher seed at NCAA's, yet he passed others by winning B1G's.
Well, unless you're freshman Jason Nolf. In which case pin in dual < rideout loss in conference finals.So the moral of the story is......duals do matter! Go figure!
amazing what a week can do.....
last saturday afternoon twitter banter had tO$U as potentially the greatest team/dual team ever.....and....now
they have 2 conference loses and questions abound with their lineup
#ilovethissport
If I’m thinking correctly, Ohio State went into the Penn State match with four undefeated wrestlers and now has none. Ouch.
Don't forget NC State fOSU next week. Additional carnage methinks may not effect B10, but will at NCAA's.
and sometimes when you lose, you actually win
#whatsthescoreofthematch
And sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie.