ADVERTISEMENT

Olympics: trans athletes, without surgery, can compete

as the gender of their choice.

1980's East German shot put team wondering "WTF?" (TIC - hat tip to David Burge)

The East German women’s teams just took doping to a ridiculous level, inasmuch as the testosterone levels essentially rose to the level of a mans and they started to resemble men. I don’t think they were trans. I might be mistaken.
 
It will be interesting when men begin winning both men's and women's gold medals in track and other sports.
Will make the move to my preferred "open" division and "women's" division.

LdN
well, we are moving to an area where men and women are considered the same. This is the basis for things like eliminating gender specific bathrooms, constructs in title IX and the ERA constitutional amendment.

At some point, it comes down to a simple question: Are men and women different? If they are not, we don't need teams for girls and equal participation. Just have a sport and let men and women compete. If the they are different, what are the differences and what guidelines need to be put in place? Then, you've got the edge cases like Trans, who's rights need to be considered as well. I am not smart enough to make the final calls but ut us clear that this could end up being quite a mess.
 
Last edited:
well, we are moving to an area where men and women are considered the same. This is the basis for things like eliminating gender specific bathrooms, constructs in title IX and the ERA constitutional amendment.

At some point, it comes down to a simple question: Are men and women different? If they are not, we don't need teams for girls and equal participation. Just have a sport and let men and women compete. If the they are different, what are the differences and what guidelines need to be put in place? Then, you've got the edge cases like Trans, who's rights need to be considered as well. I am not smart enough to make the final calls but ut us clear that this could end up being quite a mess.
Should be hangers and non-hangers if they don’t like being called men or women
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeachedLion
face value it sounds like great news. The cynic in me would want to see the count difference between the ones who transition either direction and does it map with the percentages of the general public. I'm sure it will swing greater in the one direction.
 
well, we are moving to an area where men and women are considered the same. This is the basis for things like eliminating gender specific bathrooms, constructs in title IX and the ERA constitutional amendment.

At some point, it comes down to a simple question: Are men and women different? If they are not, we don't need teams for girls and equal participation. Just have a sport and let men and women compete. If the they are different, what are the differences and what guidelines need to be put in place? Then, you've got the edge cases like Trans, who's rights need to be considered as well. I am not smart enough to make the final calls but ut us clear that this could end up being quite a mess.

It is much more simple than that.
We have women's and men's sports because in 99.99999% of cases men are better at sports than women.
If that was not the case there would be no need for women's athletics.

So, back to my point... there will soon be an open division (which is effectively what we already have but call "mens") and then a women's division.

Despite the feel good stories we see on TV where the H.S. girl is told she can't play with the boys, if a woman can play a sport better than a man she will be invited to the varsity team to compete. Coaches are paid to win.

In your article the rules aren't even. A woman can move freely a man has to be taking hormones.

"Now, surgery will no longer be required, with female-to-male transgender athletes eligible to take part in men’s competitions “without restriction”.

Meanwhile, male-to-female transgender athletes will need to demonstrate that their testosterone level has been below a certain cutoff point for at least one year before their first competition."

LdN
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_1eeb2b426hv3y
It is much more simple than that.
We have women's and men's sports because in 99.99999% of cases men are better at sports than women.
If that was not the case there would be no need for women's athletics.

So, back to my point... there will soon be an open division (which is effectively what we already have but call "mens") and then a women's division.

Despite the feel good stories we see on TV where the H.S. girl is told she can't play with the boys, if a woman can play a sport better than a man she will be invited to the varsity team to compete. Coaches are paid to win.

In your article the rules aren't even. A woman can move freely a man has to be taking hormones.

"Now, surgery will no longer be required, with female-to-male transgender athletes eligible to take part in men’s competitions “without restriction”.

Meanwhile, male-to-female transgender athletes will need to demonstrate that their testosterone level has been below a certain cutoff point for at least one year before their first competition."

LdN

I agree....but at one point in our nation's history, we called this "separate but equal".
 
  • Like
Reactions: FHSPSU67 and bmw199
well, we are moving to an area where men and women are considered the same. This is the basis for things like eliminating gender specific bathrooms, constructs in title IX and the ERA constitutional amendment.

At some point, it comes down to a simple question: Are men and women different? If they are not, we don't need teams for girls and equal participation. Just have a sport and let men and women compete. If the they are different, what are the differences and what guidelines need to be put in place? Then, you've got the edge cases like Trans, who's rights need to be considered as well. I am not smart enough to make the final calls but ut us clear that this could end up being quite a mess.


They eliminated gender specific bathrooms at my former office which was just a satellite office, about 6 attorneys and 8 support staff. Of course their idea of that was to eliminate the men's room and make it gender neutral, keep one of the previous bathrooms that was gender neutral as gender neutral, and women still got to keep one bathroom just to themselves.....Funny how that works
 
  • Like
Reactions: bmw199
They eliminated gender specific bathrooms at my former office which was just a satellite office, about 6 attorneys and 8 support staff. Of course their idea of that was to eliminate the men's room and make it gender neutral, keep one of the previous bathrooms that was gender neutral as gender neutral, and women still got to keep one bathroom just to themselves.....Funny how that works

Prior to the transgender move, this was getting a lot of traction...

https://www.citylab.com/equity/2014...ess-for-women-is-a-global-design-flaw/382418/

I imagine reconciling all of these various applications of "equal" is difficult for companies.

LdN
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
They eliminated gender specific bathrooms at my former office which was just a satellite office, about 6 attorneys and 8 support staff. Of course their idea of that was to eliminate the men's room and make it gender neutral, keep one of the previous bathrooms that was gender neutral as gender neutral, and women still got to keep one bathroom just to themselves.....Funny how that works
In a small office, why are their man and women's bathrooms at all? If the bathrooms are private, and not shared (meaning, you walk in and lock the door behind you) ? I find fast food places will have two private bathrooms marked men and women. There will be a line at one, while there is nobody in the other bathroom. Perhaps there is a law that there needs to be a separate room for women? I know that there used to be a law in Ohio that the separate womans room needed to be secured (women in an office building had a combination lock and the public people didn't have it). The second issue was that the woman's room had to have a chair, of some type, to address monthly tooling challenges.
 
It's gonna get real interesting when a 125kg male freestyle wrestler identifies as a 48kg female wrestler. No I'm not serious.
 
It is much more simple than that.
We have women's and men's sports because in 99.99999% of cases men are better at sports than women.
If that was not the case there would be no need for women's athletics.

So, back to my point... there will soon be an open division (which is effectively what we already have but call "mens") and then a women's division.

Despite the feel good stories we see on TV where the H.S. girl is told she can't play with the boys, if a woman can play a sport better than a man she will be invited to the varsity team to compete. Coaches are paid to win.

In your article the rules aren't even. A woman can move freely a man has to be taking hormones.

"Now, surgery will no longer be required, with female-to-male transgender athletes eligible to take part in men’s competitions “without restriction”.

Meanwhile, male-to-female transgender athletes will need to demonstrate that their testosterone level has been below a certain cutoff point for at least one year before their first competition."

LdN

My big issue with male to female no matter what their testosterone level is down to is that at some point they had a penis and testosterone where they were able to create muscle mass superior to any female in their lifetime. It's a violation of women's rights. Nobody's rights should come at the expense of another's and I think that's what this ruling is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OaktonDave
Now Bruce Jenner can come back and win another gold.:)

Bruce Jenner's 400 meter time in the 1976 Olympics, when he did 10 events over two days, is still faster than any woman has ever run 400 meters.

Something has to give. Being nice to trans people is fine but the simple reality is that a man that transitions to a woman has an advantage over women in athletic competitions. Letting them compete with non-trans women defeats the purpose of having a separate category for women.
 
There has already been some of this in Women's track in the Olympics; Caster Semenya from South Africa won gold in 2012 and 2016 in the Women's 800m despite controversy about her gender.

th
 
My big issue with male to female no matter what their testosterone level is down to is that at some point they had a penis and testosterone where they were able to create muscle mass superior to any female in their lifetime. It's a violation of women's rights. Nobody's rights should come at the expense of another's and I think that's what this ruling is.

Generally speaking, larger lung capacity too. So even if you were to bring down T levels and bring up estrogen levels there is a specific advantage that can't be adjusted. Especially where the weight/size of the athlete isn't equally regulated, mostly endurance sports, like marathon, biathlon, triathlon, cross country skiing, etc.

I identify myself as a 7 foot NBA player...so they have to let me play, right?

I think so? I don't know right from left, so I'm probably not the right person to ask.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psugisher
Despite the feel good stories we see on TV where the H.S. girl is told she can't play with the boys, if a woman can play a sport better than a man she will be invited to the varsity team to compete. Coaches are paid to win.

LdN

Exactly right LdN. I remember back in the early 80's a girl tried out for her high school football team. Not only was she good enough to make the team, she ended up being the starting quarterback! And contrary to what some might think, she wasn't some frumpy big ugly girl either, because her classmates also voted her homecoming queen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LionDeNittany
The problem in this is that a mature skeleton doesn't change after switching hormones. If on estrogen long enough the muscle mass and fat distribution would change to female, but all of the other advantages, much more than mere lung capacity, would remain -- larger hands and feet, narrow hips, wider shoulders, taller, etc. -- all of the things needed for effective "hunting" instead of "nesting" / child rearing.

This is a ridiculous development that, if allowed to follow its course, will end women's athletics. Like so many issues that face governing bodies, the solutions to one problem merely create other problems that are often worse.
 
The interesting questions for me are "Why do we have women's sports in the first place?" and "Will a preponderance of transitioning (male-to-female) athletes dominating women's events affect fan interest and youth participation in women's sports"?
 
You must be a Middle Eastern male.
No, I think it's a good thing to have women's sports. If I understand correctly, the purpose of women's sports is to provide places for women to compete against other women. Does this change if "gender" becomes a more fluid concept? That's why I asked the question.
 
Last edited:
No, I think it's a good thing to have women's sports. If I understand correctly, the purpose of women's sports is to provide places for women to compete against other women. Does this change if "gender" becomes a more fluid concept? That's why I asked the question.

The transgender competing vs women is a solid stomp on women’s rights. Title 9 and everything done previously to allow women opportunities to compete is being shit on by these rulings. The PC attempts are clearly coming full circle. I’m sure some prominent women will eventually protest this and they’ll be right.
 
It's like the ultimate social hotbutton paradox.

How would Title IX approve of men taking opportunity from women?
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLWBT
Men always find a way. Hahahahaha cue evil laugh by dr evil
 
The transgender competing vs women is a solid stomp on women’s rights. Title 9 and everything done previously to allow women opportunities to compete is being shit on by these rulings. The PC attempts are clearly coming full circle. I’m sure some prominent women will eventually protest this and they’ll be right.
Martina Navratilova recently made a comment on this, and got all sorts of hate from the social justice warriors for it. Interesting, since she is a feminist hero and a gay rights pioneer.
 
Martina Navratilova recently made a comment on this, and got all sorts of hate from the social justice warriors for it. Interesting, since she is a feminist hero and a gay rights pioneer.
And she probably has more testosterone than most guys.
 
As a species, humans exhibit sexual dimorphism. Males and females have quantifiable morphological differences resulting from their genotypes. Humans are certainly not alone in this regard.
You can create social opprobrium directed against people for saying 2+2=5. You can even enact laws making it illegal to say 2+2=5 and punishing people who say it.
But in the end, 2+2 still equals 5.
 
Exactly right LdN. I remember back in the early 80's a girl tried out for her high school football team. Not only was she good enough to make the team, she ended up being the starting quarterback! And contrary to what some might think, she wasn't some frumpy big ugly girl either, because her classmates also voted her homecoming queen.

Big, ugly, grumpy girls can’t be voted homecoming queens?
 
As a species, humans exhibit sexual dimorphism. Males and females have quantifiable morphological differences resulting from their genotypes. Humans are certainly not alone in this regard.
You can create social opprobrium directed against people for saying 2+2=5. You can even enact laws making it illegal to say 2+2=5 and punishing people who say it.
But in the end, 2+2 still equals 5.
2+2=5?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT