What are you trying to say with this post?The recruiting class of 2012 comes into full power.
Reference: 2014 #1, 2013 #7, 2012 #17, 2011 #4, 2010 #2, 2009 #8
The recruiting class of 2012 comes into full power.
Reference: 2014 #1, 2013 #7, 2012 #17, 2011 #4, 2010 #2, 2009 #8
Here is the entire list: http://www.d1collegewrestling.net/Top200_2012.htmlIt is pretty amazing how on average half of the overall top ten recruits for any given year fail to AA even once in college. Not sure who #10 was but 2012 appears to be even below that average with only Tsirtsis and Jimmy G being AAs with one year left.
It is pretty amazing how on average half of the overall top ten recruits for any given year fail to AA even once in college. Not sure who #10 was but 2012 appears to be even below that average with only Tsirtsis and Jimmy G being AAs with one year left.
No rhyme, no reason. That's why you don't put a lot of time in potential because they all have it. Top 25 is what I always look at and top five in weight class. State is important, too.
I have come to the conclusion that picking future AAs while they are still in HS is very similar to picking good stocks. If you do your research well, you might increase your chances if you are lucky enough that other factors that you did not consider don't have much effect. In other words, there is still a significant random element that cannot be eliminated. Picking future AAs does not seem to be much different.
Yes and no. What you're saying applies to the middle of the pack. The top top people are almost sure things. DT, ER, Zain, Jason came in as sure things, and they are. I think 2012 was a rare exception without a lot of stars. The other side of that is what is a star and how sure are you? Jimmy would have been called a star by most. Nick Nevills, what do you say now, that's a tough one?I have come to the conclusion that picking future AAs while they are still in HS is very similar to picking good stocks. If you do your research well, you might increase your chances if you are lucky enough that other factors that you did not consider don't have much effect. In other words, there is still a significant random element that cannot be eliminated. Picking future AAs does not seem to be much different.
You really think that after a decade or more of wrestling, and competing in regional and national-level events, that one year away from Washington really made that much of a difference to make Chandler Rogers a likely All-American when Jordan Rogers can't break the starting lineup?No doubt about the effect of the state where the wrestler competed in HS. There are about a half dozen states that produce a significantly higher number of AAs compared to the rest of the US.
One interesting case in point. Jordan Rogers spent all four of his HS years in WA and has not met the expectations everyone had of him at Ok State. His younger brother, Chandler, finished his HS career at Stillwater HS in OK, and I think that he is a good bet to AA this year. I think that last year he spent at Stillwater HS helped his college game tremendously.
Several people with whom I've had wrestling blog discussions over the years believe that the biggest difference between the wrestling in the states that produce more AAs compared to the others is the quality of mat wrestling, especially the ability to get off the bottom. I've seen guys who were animals in HS get mauled on the mat in college because they couldn't get away when being ridden.
Bingo!It's complicated, but the statistics do show a correlation. For example -- top-10 guys have a higher frequency of success (AA finishes) than 11 through 20, and 11 through 20 have a higher frequency of success than 21 through 30, etc., etc., etc. Did an analysis of this years ago, using top-100 guys over (I think) a period that approached 10 years. The other thing I noticed was the higher up the recruiting rankings, the higher the frequency of high AA finishes (ie. more likely to be a National Champ or Silver Medalist), as well as a higher frequency of multiple AA finishes.
But there is no guarantee, as others above have said. Here's why I think that is;
1) Some kids "peak" at a younger age. This is where the "coach's eye" for talent comes in, and finding the top talent that still has significant upside is key. I believe Cael & Co. does this better than most.
2) Attitude!! College is an entirely different animal than High School, and so much of a recruit's college success lie in the intangibles.
3) Academics. Probably shouldn't be 3rd on my list, but we can't forget the "student" in student-athlete. A professional can focus on their craft. College student-athletes must balance the academic, social, and athletic aspects of their existence. More kids than are known struggle with this.
4) Other. Injuries, bad decisions, family matters, etc. can derail a college wrestling career.
You really think that after a decade or more of wrestling, and competing in regional and national-level events, that one year away from Washington really made that much of a difference to make Chandler Rogers a likely All-American when Jordan Rogers can't break the starting lineup?
Because that doesn't explain a whole host of guys who've done well despite their HS states not being elite -- Bo Nickal (TX), Tim Dudley (SC), Andrew Howe (IN), Travis Lee (HI), Jordan Leen (TN), etc.
What likely helped Chandler Rogers the most was moving specifically to Stillwater and training with the Pokes freestyle club for that year. But even that doesn't explain the disparity between the brothers' college careers.
That last part will never get old.There may be some merit to it, but I'm skeptical of it being true very often. We've seen international guys with zero folk experience reach the podium and even win the title. And we've also seen PA natives who couldn't be pried off the mat with a crowbar.
To name 2 of them: who ever would've guessed that Gelogaev (who loathed wrestling on bottom and faced a lot of skilled top stallers) would be better at it than Courts?
I've heard a similar comment about Ohio refs, but David Taylor was fantastic on bottom, and Logan Stieber was a JEDI in all 3 positions as long as he didn't have to deal with the flu, a long bus ride, and average officials..
Chandler is mentally tougher than Jordan. Makes all the difference in the world.You really think that after a decade or more of wrestling, and competing in regional and national-level events, that one year away from Washington really made that much of a difference to make Chandler Rogers a likely All-American when Jordan Rogers can't break the starting lineup?
Because that doesn't explain a whole host of guys who've done well despite their HS states not being elite -- Bo Nickal (TX), Tim Dudley (SC), Andrew Howe (IN), Travis Lee (HI), Jordan Leen (TN), etc.
What likely helped Chandler Rogers the most was moving specifically to Stillwater and training with the Pokes freestyle club for that year. But even that doesn't explain the disparity between the brothers' college careers.