I find it hard to fault a judge who likely signs a multitude of documents every week - many of which aren't memorable. She may have felt the signature looked like hers but she wasn't a document examiner. Only a very good forger would have been able to pen out an authentic looking signature on one try which is what the former secretary claimed SPM did. Whatever anyone thinks of SPM, I seriously doubt she's close to being a forger which was proven by expert testimony.
My question is will the former secretary be charged? She claimed she witnessed SPM forge the judge's signature when experts have testified the signature was authentic. Given that fact, it follows the secretary couldn't have seen what she claimed. Will anyone even care enough to investigate? I doubt it.