OT: Fall semester is almost upon us. Test your academic skill ...

[Zenophile]

Let's start with an easy one.

If train A leaves Chicago traveling east at 60 miles per hour and train B departs Cedar Rapids traveling eastbound an hour later going 85 miles per hour, how much does Mark Emmert enjoy the manual collection of canine semen samples?​

 

[Peetz Pool Boy]

Let's start with an easy one.

If train A leaves Chicago traveling east at 60 miles per hour and train B departs Cedar Rapids traveling eastbound an hour later going 85 miles per hour, how much does Mark Emmert enjoy the manual collection of canine semen samples?​

michnittlion is disappointed that you didn't include "some" as one of your possible answers

 

[BobPSU92]

c. a WHOLE. bunch

 

[Zenophile]

michnittlion is disappointed that you didn't include "some" as one of your possible answers

Unfortunately, yes. He's bound to experience some disappointment.

 

[STPGopherfan]

Let's start with an easy one.

If train A leaves Chicago traveling east at 60 miles per hour and train B departs Cedar Rapids traveling eastbound an hour later going 85 miles per hour, how much does Mark Emmert enjoy the manual collection of canine semen samples?​

Excuse me professor. Why would a train go through Cedar Rapids(Ia)? https://petergreenberg.com/2008/11/17/dont-go-there-5-stinky-places/

 

[Zenophile]

Excuse me professor. Why would a train go through Cedar Rapids(Ia)? https://petergreenberg.com/2008/11/17/dont-go-there-5-stinky-places/

So much for my parade.

 

[STPGopherfan]

So much for my parade.

Okay, second question professor. How is the canine sample manually collected? Metacarpal manipulation or pie hole siphoning?

 

[Art]

Okay, second question professor. How is the canine sample manually collected? Metacarpal manipulation or pie hole siphoning?

There is a third way, which Emmert enjoys a-Hole lot more.

 

[Zenophile]

Okay, second question professor. How is the canine sample manually collected? Metacarpal manipulation or pie hole siphoning?

seems reasonable to assume that such a Person of ImportancE would Have his Own favorite coLlEction method.

 

[michnittlion]

michnittlion is disappointed that you didn't include "some" as one of your possible answers

Given that some is defined as "an unspecified amount or number of", we can assume that "some" is a subset of both "whole" and "WHOLE" and thus already included in the poll.

 

[Art]

Given that some is defined as "an unspecified amount or number of", we can assume that "some" is a subset of both "whole" and "WHOLE" and thus already included in the poll.

Idiot.

 

[michnittlion]

Idiot.

I didn't want to derail this thread by taking it off tangent --- but since you decided to not play along with the joke but instead decided to attack --- I will note that the judges, when they threw out Jay Paterno's lawsuit against the NCAA, made the exact same argument I made all these years as regards the word "some" not referring to Jay Paterno:

Furthermore, Head Coach Paterno and McQueary are the only coaches implicated in the Freeh Report for failing to intervene appropriately in the Sandusky Scandal.5 And only Head Coach Paterno is named in the Consent Decree. Thus, viewing Appellants' complaint in the most favorable light to Appellants does not allow for a reasonable nexus between the use of "some coaches" and Appellants.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In FCO 20170509090/PATERNO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Fair enough if you think I am an "idiot." But on that one, the court of law agreed with me.

 

[91Joe95]

Idiot.

Simple and to the point.

 

[michnittlion]

Simple and to the point.

I will also note to you ---- the court, when they threw out Jay Paterno's lawsuit against the NCAA, made the exact same argument I made all these years as regards the word "some" not referring to Jay Paterno:

Furthermore, Head Coach Paterno and McQueary are the only coaches implicated in the Freeh Report for failing to intervene appropriately in the Sandusky Scandal.5And only Head Coach Paterno is named in the Consent Decree. Thus, viewing Appellants' complaint in the most favorable light to Appellants does not allow for a reasonable nexus between the use of "some coaches" and Appellants.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In FCO 20170509090/PATERNO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Fair enough if you think I am an "idiot." But on that one, I was correct. The court of law agreed with me.

 

[BobPSU92]

Okay, second question professor. How is the canine sample manually collected? Metacarpal manipulation or pie hole siphoning?

Tongs.

 

[BobPSU92]

There is a third way, which Emmert enjoys a-Hole lot more.

emmert molests collies.

 

[MtNittany]

michwitvoet: Heel, toed repeatedly shortly after birth.

 

[colt21]

I didn't want to derail this thread by taking it off tangent --- but since you decided to not play along with the joke but instead decided to attack --- I will note that the judges, when they threw out Jay Paterno's lawsuit against the NCAA, made the exact same argument I made all these years as regards the word "some" not referring to Jay Paterno:

Furthermore, Head Coach Paterno and McQueary are the only coaches implicated in the Freeh Report for failing to intervene appropriately in the Sandusky Scandal.5 And only Head Coach Paterno is named in the Consent Decree. Thus, viewing Appellants' complaint in the most favorable light to Appellants does not allow for a reasonable nexus between the use of "some coaches" and Appellants.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In FCO 20170509090/PATERNO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Fair enough if you think I am an "idiot." But on that one, the court of law agreed with me.

The court of law agreed that you are an idiot? Hmm, go figure, they got one right !

 

[Art]

I didn't want to derail this thread by taking it off tangent --- but since you decided to not play along with the joke but instead decided to attack --- I will note that the judges, when they threw out Jay Paterno's lawsuit against the NCAA, made the exact same argument I made all these years as regards the word "some" not referring to Jay Paterno:

Furthermore, Head Coach Paterno and McQueary are the only coaches implicated in the Freeh Report for failing to intervene appropriately in the Sandusky Scandal.5 And only Head Coach Paterno is named in the Consent Decree. Thus, viewing Appellants' complaint in the most favorable light to Appellants does not allow for a reasonable nexus between the use of "some coaches" and Appellants.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In FCO 20170509090/PATERNO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Fair enough if you think I am an "idiot." But on that one, the court of law agreed with me.

The "court of law/?" You mean the judges who couldn't make it in private practice. Piss the fvck off, asshole.

 

[michnittlion]

The "court of law/?" You mean the judges who couldn't make it in private practice. Piss the fvck off, asshole.

Fair enough, you're smarter than those "judges who couldn't make it in private practice."

But I get it --- you're the "smartest man on BWI and a man who is always right." That's your shtick here. Been your shtick for years.

 

[michnittlion]

The court of law agreed that you are an idiot? Hmm, go figure, they got one right !

Good comeback. You get a like.

Unlike posters like Art, I like to think I can take a joke.

 

[Nittany Ziggy]

I didn't want to derail this thread by taking it off tangent --- but since you decided to not play along with the joke but instead decided to attack --- I will note that the judges, when they threw out Jay Paterno's lawsuit against the NCAA, made the exact same argument I made all these years as regards the word "some" not referring to Jay Paterno:

Furthermore, Head Coach Paterno and McQueary are the only coaches implicated in the Freeh Report for failing to intervene appropriately in the Sandusky Scandal.5 And only Head Coach Paterno is named in the Consent Decree. Thus, viewing Appellants' complaint in the most favorable light to Appellants does not allow for a reasonable nexus between the use of "some coaches" and Appellants.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In FCO 20170509090/PATERNO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Fair enough if you think I am an "idiot." But on that one, the court of law agreed with me.

You really didn't want to derail this thread? IDIOT!

 

[91Joe95]

You really didn't want to derail this thread? IDIOT!

Another short and accurate observation.

 

[Art]

Good comeback. You get a like.

Unlike posters like Art, I like to think I can take a joke.

The only joke here is you, asshole.