ADVERTISEMENT

People with psychopathic traits 'are more likely to ignore lockdown restrictions'

Nitt1300

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2008
61,188
18,690
1
interesting read

People who exhibit psychopathic traits are likely to ignore lockdown restrictions, a study has suggested.

Other so-called ‘dark triad’ personality characteristics, such as narcissism and Machiavellianism, could also impact a person’s willingness to comply with social distancing rules, the research said.

It suggests that people with such traits may have played a larger part in the spread of COVID-19 by ignoring restrictions such as social distancing.

The study, by Dr Pavel Blagov of Whitman College in Washington state, said that those with psychopathic personality traits such as meanness are less likely to comply with lockdown restrictions.

And those with poor impulse control were more likely to boast of behaviours that put others at risk, Blagov said in an interview with Psypost.

He said: “My experience as a psychological scientist as well as a practicing psychologist has convinced me that the importance of psychology and behaviour in the prevention and management of a wide range of health problems is enormous.

“This includes personality, or the study of important ways in which people differ. It was clear from reports in the media very early in the COVID-19 pandemic that some people were rejecting advice to socially distance and engage in increased hygiene.

“There can be many reasons for this, and I thought that personality may play at least a small role in it.”

Blagov surveyed 50 adults about virus-related behaviour in late March, as lockdowns were being imposed in multiple U.S. states.

The survey took place at a time when behaviour around the virus had not yet become highly politicised in America, Blagov said.

The results have been accepted for publication in the journal Social Psychology and Personality Science, and is available on the pre-print server PsyArxiv.

more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/psychopaths-ignore-lockdown-173702699.html
 
This it probably even more so in psychopaths that tested positive. They'd enjoy spreading a virus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany Ned2
Psychopaths, and sociopaths and narcissists lack empathy and think rules of behavior only apply to others. They could care less about others and the harm they may bring to other people so of course they would ignore any lockdown restrictions.
This probably describes most of our elected officials.
Like Chesterton once observed , “ It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged “.
 
Read it; makes sense to me.
It shows in many ways. Just 1 grammar: Me and my friend........
Put ourselves first and do it with bad grammar.
My wife and I were comparing UK and US competitive cooking shows: how vain and self-centered the US participants are. Thank you UK for being more gracious.
I had to cringe last year watching the behavior of the US Women's Soccer team at the World Cup. They would play clearly overmatched opponents and on their 8th, 9th, 10th goals were out there doing these orchestrated celebrations like they old University of Miami football team. I felt embarrassed for them but I guess I am old fashioned.
 
1. Social "science" it not science. Almost no social science experiment can replicate it's results which means it's BS
2. This idiot has a sample size of 50? The psych students at PSU did better than that.
3. It's not a psychological flaw to question the efficacy of the lockdown restrictions. It's wholly logical as many of them make no sense whatsoever and skeptics have been significantly validated as the WHO/CDC and state agencies revise much of the guidance that the govt had been scolding us about as essential to not kill grandma.
 
[QUOTE="Nitt1300, post: 49064]
It suggests that people with such traits may have played a larger part in the spread of
Blagov surveyed 50 adults about virus-related behaviour in late March, as lockdowns were being imposed in multiple U.S. states.

The survey took place at a time when behaviour around the virus had not yet become highly politicised in America, Blagov said.


more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/psychopaths-ignore-lockdown-173702699.html[/QUOTE]

BS saying that people with psychological issues will break arbitrary rules doesn't mean that everyone that questions them has psychological issues.

And not political in March??? This was politicized from the get go. Trump banned flights from China in January and he was called racist, xenophobic, jingoistic, and accused of doing it for political reasons.....getting impeachment out of the headlines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heckmans
interesting read

People who exhibit psychopathic traits are likely to ignore lockdown restrictions, a study has suggested.

Other so-called ‘dark triad’ personality characteristics, such as narcissism and Machiavellianism, could also impact a person’s willingness to comply with social distancing rules, the research said.

It suggests that people with such traits may have played a larger part in the spread of COVID-19 by ignoring restrictions such as social distancing.

The study, by Dr Pavel Blagov of Whitman College in Washington state, said that those with psychopathic personality traits such as meanness are less likely to comply with lockdown restrictions.

And those with poor impulse control were more likely to boast of behaviours that put others at risk, Blagov said in an interview with Psypost.

He said: “My experience as a psychological scientist as well as a practicing psychologist has convinced me that the importance of psychology and behaviour in the prevention and management of a wide range of health problems is enormous.

“This includes personality, or the study of important ways in which people differ. It was clear from reports in the media very early in the COVID-19 pandemic that some people were rejecting advice to socially distance and engage in increased hygiene.

“There can be many reasons for this, and I thought that personality may play at least a small role in it.”

Blagov surveyed 50 adults about virus-related behaviour in late March, as lockdowns were being imposed in multiple U.S. states.

The survey took place at a time when behaviour around the virus had not yet become highly politicised in America, Blagov said.

The results have been accepted for publication in the journal Social Psychology and Personality Science, and is available on the pre-print server PsyArxiv.

more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/psychopaths-ignore-lockdown-173702699.html
Based on what I saw last week in Minneapolis and many other USA cities, I might agree with that.
 
[QUOTE="Nitt1300, post: 49064]
It suggests that people with such traits may have played a larger part in the spread of
Blagov surveyed 50 adults about virus-related behaviour in late March, as lockdowns were being imposed in multiple U.S. states.

The survey took place at a time when behaviour around the virus had not yet become highly politicised in America, Blagov said.


more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/psychopaths-ignore-lockdown-173702699.html


And not political in March??? This was politicized from the get go. Trump banned flights from China in January and he was called racist, xenophobic, jingoistic, and accused of doing it for political reasons.....getting impeachment out of the headlines.[/QUOTE]



I saw no mention of Trump in what I posted. Granted, they did mention narcissism.
 
in other news:

According to The Washington Post, which has been tracking data, 14 states and Puerto Rico have “recorded their highest-ever seven day average of new coronavirus cases since the pandemic began.” Since the beginning of June, this increase in cases has impacted the following states: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Kentucky, New Mexico, North Carolina, Mississippi, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. Worst of all, The Post reports that “the highest percentage of new cases are coming from places with much smaller populations,” which puts a massive strain on their medical infrastructures. Small towns like the mentioned Lincoln County, Oregon, have fewer hospitals and resources and may not be well-equipped to deal with a sudden surge in COVID-19 cases.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/14-states-puerto-rico-hit-083237905.html
 
And not political in March??? This was politicized from the get go. Trump banned flights from China in January and he was called racist, xenophobic, jingoistic, and accused of doing it for political reasons.....getting impeachment out of the headlines.



[QUOTE="Nitt1300]I saw no mention of Trump in what I posted. Granted, they did mention narcissism.[/QUOTE]



The article said it was 'done in March before things got political ' which is ridiculous..... as I pointed out quite well.
 
in other news:

According to The Washington Post, which has been tracking data, 14 states and Puerto Rico have “recorded their highest-ever seven day average of new coronavirus cases since the pandemic began.” Since the beginning of June, this increase in cases has impacted the following states: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Kentucky, New Mexico, North Carolina, Mississippi, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah. Worst of all, The Post reports that “the highest percentage of new cases are coming from places with much smaller populations,” which puts a massive strain on their medical infrastructures. Small towns like the mentioned Lincoln County, Oregon, have fewer hospitals and resources and may not be well-equipped to deal with a sudden surge in COVID-19 cases.

https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/14-states-puerto-rico-hit-083237905.html
The number of new cases doesn't mean anything without the percentage of positives. Here in md some news stations are reporting number of tests per day now as well as the positives. Seems that people that actually understand math kept harassing some of the news stations and a couple people at the top figured it might be a good idea
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT