Laughable, MSU's record for the 5-year period prior to Saban's arrival was 22-34-1 (78th out of 106 teams that played DI-A during the entire 5-year span). Beyond that, MSU had exactly ZERO winning seasons in the prior 4 seasons to his arrival (MSU was 14-31 in the 4 seasons from 1991-1994). Just absurd to claim that his turning MSU into a winner during his 5-year tenure (MSU had a winning record while Saban was there and recorded zero sub-.500 seasons) and a Top 10, 10-2 team (#7 in the final poll of both AP and Coaches Polls) in his last year was not an incredible transformation and coaching job.
I never said anything negative about Saban's tenure at MSU. Did you miss this quote in my post: "While Nick Saban deserves tremendous acclaim because of all the titles he has gotten at LSU and Bama ..."?
I only posited that his record there after 2 years, with no unjust sanctions to hinder his efforts, were no better than James Franklin's first 2 years at PSU. You are actually not being totally honest when you state MSU's record prior to Saban's tenure. As I stated in my post (did you actually read it? This is the 2nd item you missed.) The Spartans won 5 games in 1994 but had to forfeit them; their on-the-field record was actually quite even at 27-29-1.
My point, which you, again, somehow missed, was that Saban had 5 years to get a bowl win and a greater-than-7-win season. Yet, he is still considered almost universally as among the top 1 or 2 (he's my #2) coaches in the country. James Franklin won a bowl game in his 1st year, got 7 wins in both years, but still gets criticism from fans as being "unproven" as a coach.
If you do not understand what I am saying, it is all right with me. Our opinions on matters do not have to agree. But you could at least stick to the things I really did say rather than manufacture ideas that I did not say.