Of course Williamson can sue Nike and he probably should. Nike provided a defective product to him that might well diminish his future earnings since the pros may view him as damaged goods. Also, he was unable to showcase his abilities in what might have been the biggest game of the year. I never saw a sneaker fall apart like this. Doesn't Nike have any quality control?
Depends on how much money gets written into the Nike contract. If he could win a suit for say $100 million and Nike would give him only $10 million more, then maybe he sues. I wonder how many scumbag lawyers have already contacted Zion.I imagine he won't have to sue Nike. They will just agree to write more money into his future contract.
A suit would be bad for both parties.
LdN
Isn't it Duke that has a contract with Nike? If so then they are forcing him to wear Nike shoes.Depends on how much money gets written into the Nike contract. If he could win a suit for say $100 million and Nike would give him only $10 million more, then maybe he sues. I wonder how many scumbag lawyers have already contacted Zion.
The other way this could be played is to change to another shoe manufacturer -- say Adidas. Other manufacturers are probably salivating over this since they could say that Nike makes inferior shoes -- just look at what happened to Zion, it could happen to you. Changing to Adidas could allow Zion to sue Nike for the max and get a big payday from Adidas too.
I bet the Nike CEO, Mark Parker, is so pissed that he is out of his mind. He has probably already fired everyone associated with quality control on the shoe model worn by Zion.
Wow! If so, then he can sue Nike and Duke and get a double payday. Soon Zion will have more money than Jeff Bezos!Isn't it Duke that has a contract with Nike? If so then they are forcing him to wear Nike shoes.
I never saw a sneaker fall apart like this. Doesn't Nike have any quality control?
….or you posting a snarky comment about the whole thing?Can't figure out which is funnier:
a) the article;
b) that people took time to read it; or
c) people took time to read it and followed up with this discussion.
Talk about premature speculation.
….or you posting a snarky comment about the whole thing?
I would argue that the exploding shoes actually prevented his knee from blowing out....if his foot didn't go through his shoe it may have put so much torque on the knee he could have torn it.
If this did reach a courtroom and you were NIKE, that’s not a defense I would advise hanging my hat on.I would argue that the exploding shoes actually prevented his knee from blowing out....if his foot didn't go through his shoe it may have put so much torque on the knee he could have torn it.
….or you posting a snarky comment about the whole thing?
It was tongue in cheek, but it is true, he wild have been worse off if that shoe didn’t break.If this did reach a courtroom and you were NIKE, that’s not a defense I would advise hanging my hat on.
I know, it’s just that it reminded me of some of the crazy things that people used to say to me when I was retained to defend them. My favorite was the woman who rear ended a parked car at 40mph. She claimed it wasn’t her fault because she honked her horn first.It was tongue in cheek, but it is true, he wild have been worse off if that shoe didn’t break.
I’m surprised Art’s not telling us how much better Nike would be if he was in charge.
Already has new gear.
Depends on how much money gets written into the Nike contract. If he could win a suit for say $100 million and Nike would give him only $10 million more, then maybe he sues. I wonder how many scumbag lawyers have already contacted Zion.
The other way this could be played is to change to another shoe manufacturer -- say Adidas. Other manufacturers are probably salivating over this since they could say that Nike makes inferior shoes -- just look at what happened to Zion, it could happen to you. Changing to Adidas could allow Zion to sue Nike for the max and get a big payday from Adidas too.
I bet the Nike CEO, Mark Parker, is so pissed that he is out of his mind. He has probably already fired everyone associated with quality control on the shoe model worn by Zion.
This does bring up and interesting question and that is related to the design criteria of the shoe. If they were originally designed for Paul George, their durability/ability to withstand stress relative to their weight was optimized for someone his size (6'9 220 lbs), not someone Zion's size (6'7, 285).
Perhaps shoe companies need to consider placing warnings on specific shoes if you are above a certain weight and intend to wear them for competitive purposes. Either that or build all shoes sold to the public (i.e. not engineered for a specific athlete) up to a certain "weight tolerance".
Sadly, many on this board are premature speculatorsTalk about premature speculation.
Nike ought to be sued. I've never seen something like what happened to Williamson, but I've seen Nikes consistently start coming apart pretty early both for my kids and myself, and I don't think we're especially hard on shoes. I've bought no-name shoes that were more durable than Nikes at a fraction of the cost.Of course Williamson can sue Nike and he probably should. Nike provided a defective product to him that might well diminish his future earnings since the pros may view him as damaged goods. Also, he was unable to showcase his abilities in what might have been the biggest game of the year. I never saw a sneaker fall apart like this. Doesn't Nike have any quality control?