ADVERTISEMENT

Spanier Avoids Jailtime?

didier

Well-Known Member
Oct 5, 2007
992
1,120
1
Ruling In:

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the application (Doc. 1) for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner, Graham B. Spanier, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Spaniers petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED with respect to the first two grounds raised in the petition, namely that the application of the 2007 child endangerment statute to his 2001 conduct, and the jury instruction based on the 2007 statute, as applied to Spanier, are unconstitutional. His petition is DENIED with respect to the third ground raised, the application of a statute-of-limitations exception not raised by the Commonwealth before or at trial. 2. Spaniers conviction and sentence for one count of Endangerment of the Welfare of a Child in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, No. CP-22-CR-0003615-2013 are VACATED. 3. The execution of the writ of habeas corpus is STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order, during which time the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may afford Spanier a new trial. 4. A certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to Spaniers third claim, that his conviction was upheld on the basis of a statute-of-limitations exception that the Commonwealth did not raise before trial. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 4/30/2019. (cw) (Entered: 04/30/2019)
 
If true....they dicked around with this for how many years and how many dollars? Won't see the light of day, from the media

1. Spaniers petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED with respect to the first two grounds raised in the petition, namely that the application of the 2007 child endangerment statute to his 2001 conduct, and the jury instruction based on the 2007 statute, as applied to Spanier, are unconstitutional.
 
Very favorable ruling for Spanier. Avoided reporting to prison. Commonwealth has the option of retrying him if they desire. I wouldn't be surprised to see the prosecutors pass on a retrial.
 
Very favorable ruling for Spanked. Avoided reporting to prison. Commonwealth has the option of retrying him if they desire. I wouldn't be surprised to see the prosecutors pass on a retrial.

Would agree except Shapiro has really made child abuse his cornerstone issue. Nobody above the law. Would be pretty meek for him to back down without another fight.
 
Would agree except Shapiro has really made child abuse his cornerstone issue. Nobody above the law. Would be pretty meek for him to back down without another fight.

Shapiro is driving hard to the hoop for the 2022 gubernatorial race. He'll make whatever decision makes him look good. He inherited the Sandusky related charges and would have taken heat had he failed to pursue them regardless if he thought they were warranted. Now the feds have given him an out if he chooses to take it.
 
Would agree except Shapiro has really made child abuse his cornerstone issue. Nobody above the law. Would be pretty meek for him to back down without another fight.

I just hope they put so called “Victim 5” back on the stand. Hopefully, Spanier’s attorney has the balls to cross examine him this time and asks him why his claim against PSU contradicted his testimony at Sandusky’s trial. Not to mention changing the date by four years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBrown
Shapiro will most certainly try him again.

And hopefully Spanier chooses to put on a defense
You may be right but I'd be surprised. This will pass with little fanfair. you can bet that Spanier's lawyers won't pass again on calling witnesses. At the same time, prosecution has lost leverage on Curley and Schultz. Prosecution retrying this is nothing but a "no-win" situation for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nits74
Would agree except Shapiro has really made child abuse his cornerstone issue. Nobody above the law. Would be pretty meek for him to back down without another fight.


No he has made specific calculated political decisions. He never investigated the catholic dioceses in Hburg that turned over abusers to the York DA. Who was fiest deputy DA at the time. Ensbach. Now she is running for judge
 
Would agree except Shapiro has really made child abuse his cornerstone issue. Nobody above the law. Would be pretty meek for him to back down without another fight.
It probably depends on the strength of his case. He doesn't want to lose.
 
You may be right but I'd be surprised. This will pass with little fanfair. you can bet that Spanier's lawyers won't pass again on calling witnesses. At the same time, prosecution has lost leverage on Curley and Schultz. Prosecution retrying this is nothing but a "no-win" situation for them.

The prosecution already had their way with Curley/Schultz
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Joe95
If true....they dicked around with this for how many years and how many dollars? Won't see the light of day, from the media

1. Spaniers petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED with respect to the first two grounds raised in the petition, namely that the application of the 2007 child endangerment statute to his 2001 conduct, and the jury instruction based on the 2007 statute, as applied to Spanier, are unconstitutional.

Holy shiat, Obli. Your latest Sig Pic is the bomb. ROFL ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
Ruling In:

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the application (Doc. 1) for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner, Graham B. Spanier, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Spaniers petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED with respect to the first two grounds raised in the petition, namely that the application of the 2007 child endangerment statute to his 2001 conduct, and the jury instruction based on the 2007 statute, as applied to Spanier, are unconstitutional. His petition is DENIED with respect to the third ground raised, the application of a statute-of-limitations exception not raised by the Commonwealth before or at trial. 2. Spaniers conviction and sentence for one count of Endangerment of the Welfare of a Child in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, No. CP-22-CR-0003615-2013 are VACATED. 3. The execution of the writ of habeas corpus is STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order, during which time the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may afford Spanier a new trial. 4. A certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to Spaniers third claim, that his conviction was upheld on the basis of a statute-of-limitations exception that the Commonwealth did not raise before trial. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 4/30/2019. (cw) (Entered: 04/30/2019)
Wow. That is a slap-down of the commonwealth.

Interesting that this kind of relief is granted by a Magistrate Judge. I guess maybe it’s because the charge was so low-level.

Are Curley and Schultz still on parol? If so, I wonder if they move to vacate.
 
Wow. Hope an attorney here can confirm what this appears to say. Conviction vacated, state must retry the case?
90 days to respond?
Not a lawyer!
It says that the state may chose to retry the case, not must. The state could simply give up if it wanted to.
 
Shapiro is driving hard to the hoop for the 2022 gubernatorial race. He'll make whatever decision makes him look good. He inherited the Sandusky related charges and would have taken heat had he failed to pursue them regardless if he thought they were warranted. Now the feds have given him an out if he chooses to take it.
The feds?
 
Ruling In:

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the application (Doc. 1) for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner, Graham B. Spanier, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Spaniers petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED with respect to the first two grounds raised in the petition, namely that the application of the 2007 child endangerment statute to his 2001 conduct, and the jury instruction based on the 2007 statute, as applied to Spanier, are unconstitutional. His petition is DENIED with respect to the third ground raised, the application of a statute-of-limitations exception not raised by the Commonwealth before or at trial. 2. Spaniers conviction and sentence for one count of Endangerment of the Welfare of a Child in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, No. CP-22-CR-0003615-2013 are VACATED. 3. The execution of the writ of habeas corpus is STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order, during which time the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may afford Spanier a new trial. 4. A certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to Spaniers third claim, that his conviction was upheld on the basis of a statute-of-limitations exception that the Commonwealth did not raise before trial. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 4/30/2019. (cw) (Entered: 04/30/2019)
Shocking because there was a huge cover-up. Smh. We know where the cover-up was fellas. This case was always a F-ing disgrace.
 
Ruling In:

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of the application (Doc. 1) for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner, Graham B. Spanier, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Spaniers petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is GRANTED with respect to the first two grounds raised in the petition, namely that the application of the 2007 child endangerment statute to his 2001 conduct, and the jury instruction based on the 2007 statute, as applied to Spanier, are unconstitutional. His petition is DENIED with respect to the third ground raised, the application of a statute-of-limitations exception not raised by the Commonwealth before or at trial. 2. Spaniers conviction and sentence for one count of Endangerment of the Welfare of a Child in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, No. CP-22-CR-0003615-2013 are VACATED. 3. The execution of the writ of habeas corpus is STAYED for 90 days from the date of this order, during which time the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may afford Spanier a new trial. 4. A certificate of appealability shall issue with respect to Spaniers third claim, that his conviction was upheld on the basis of a statute-of-limitations exception that the Commonwealth did not raise before trial. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Rule 11(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 4/30/2019. (cw) (Entered: 04/30/2019)
Good comments in this article from Lubrano and another BOT.
https://www.pennlive.com/news/2019/04/graham-spanier-conviction-overturned.html
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT