ADVERTISEMENT

Spread or Pro Style

We also have to be reasonable when comparing the two offenses. Today players are protected, a scrambling QB is gingerly tackled, 20 years ago a safety or a LB would knock him out of the game, even if it meant taking a penalty. A safety would annihilate wide receiver crossing the middle. A small and light QB like Pat White would not be able to endure a blind side helmet to helmet hit from a OLB. My point is that "some" of the power spreads success must be attributed to significant rule chanes to protect the players.

I don't think the College game protects the QB nearly as much as the NFL does.
 
I know this is so 1980's but a new book is out about this very discussion pro style vs spread... these would be 3 pro style coaches
Guts and Genius: The Story of Three Unlikely Coaches Who Came to Dominate the NFL in the '80s
How three football legends -- Bill Walsh, Joe Gibbs, and Bill Parcells -- won eight Super Bowls during the 1980s and changed football forever.
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 16.0px Calibri; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000} span.s1 {font-kerning: none} Bill Walsh, Joe Gibbs and Bill Parcells dominated what may go down as the greatest decade in pro football history, leading their teams to a combined eight championships and developing some of the most gifted players of all time in the process.

Walsh, Gibbs and Parcells developed such NFL stars as Joe Montana, Lawrence Taylor, Jerry Rice, Art Monk and Darrell Green. They resurrected the careers of players like John Riggins, Joe Theismann, Doug Williams, Everson Walls and Hacksaw Reynolds. They did so with a combination of guts and genius, built championship teams in their own likeness, and revolutionized pro football like few others. Their influence is still evident in today's game, with coaches who either worked directly for them or are part of their coaching trees now winning Super Bowls and using strategy the three men devised and perfected.

In interviews with more than 150 players, coaches, family members and friends, GUTS AND GENIUS digs into the careers of three men who overcame their own insecurities and
 
ketchup or mustard? cats or dogs? blonds or brunets?

Each has its own strengths and weaknesses. To me, it really comes down to the talent you have and the innovative level of understanding the staff has on the scheme.

I really liked what JoeMo did because defenses are so situational today. When you bring in your set, on offense, the D counters with their set. If you have three TEs or four WRs, the D sends in their pass rushing or run stopping DL and their man, zone, nickel DBs. JoeMo had three experienced and awesome WRs and an awesome TE with a generational RB. So that package didn't change much. He'd run, pass, deep pass, screen, reverse, jet sweep.......with the same set. The D had no idea about tendencies unless the RB motioned out of the backfield to an empty set.

This year, we are now playing three guys with very little game day experience (Hamler, Dotson, Friermuth). Last game, 75% of the WR/TE snaps were taken by guys who had never played in college game before this year. We'd have the same problem no matter who was at QB or what the scheme is this year.
 
to that end right here is that very debate going on. BTW NSFW these guys lead the NFL in rushing 8 /12 years, and were in the top 3 11/12 years (with 2 different teams and 9 different RB's) this is circa 2005 and I have it qued up to the place they really get into the meat of the discussion..


BTW the guys in the crowd is the current FL HC & OC (the big guy is FL OC/OL coach)
 
[QUOTE="kijanacat, post: 3819452, member: 40880] ... Joe Pa once said he preferred a power I since it made the defense defend both sides of the field and not favor one or the other.[/QUOTE]

I liked the “ProSet” PSU ran with Enis, Harris. Given the name, im surprised how it has disappeared - suspect the “full back” players aren’t the runners they used to be, and the “tail back” players aren’t the run blockers they were.
 
I thought this thread was how you do your wife, spread or pro style.
 
I'd settle for allowing an experienced QB to audible at the LOS on his own and quickly getting the play off a few seconds later before the defense can adjust. Seems like stopping, looking to the sideline, changing the play, resetting, then snapping isn't very effective.

I thought we'd see some of that this year, in Trace I'd Trust
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT