Not really. Not a surprise at all.
https://www.post-gazette.com/sports...Spanier-sandusky-baldwin/stories/201812290068
https://www.post-gazette.com/sports...Spanier-sandusky-baldwin/stories/201812290068
Surprise ruling regarding Frank Fina
- Thread starter LurkerLazarus
- Start date
Decision announced on Friday between Christmas and New Year's Day. Will many people even notice??
So reading the article sounds like cleared because of a technicality that was done on purpose essentially leading one to believe this whole thing was set up like this to be cleared later.
The panel rejected the complaint for a simple reason: It noted that the subpoena of Baldwin was signed not by then-Chief Deputy Attorney General Fina, but by Bruce Beemer, his superior as chief of staff to the attorney general and a member of the team pursuing the case.
That does seem like a pretty big swing and a miss. Kind of a glaring technicality. Still. And if the complaint had been filed against Beemer what do you think the result would have been?
That does seem like a pretty big swing and a miss. Kind of a glaring technicality. Still. And if the complaint had been filed against Beemer what do you think the result would have been?
Last edited:
My personal opinion and experience is that a large number of prosecutors are crooked or willing to cover up for those that are crooked
