ADVERTISEMENT

The importance of RB's blocking

Fayette_LION

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Jan 28, 2004
11,614
9,708
1
anybody think Freeman would like to have a chance to block that LBer rather than whiff block? One play can sure turn things around quickly
 
No mention of Atlanta D folding like a tent? Freeman missed a block, but he was also their star of the game.
 
The Patriots offense wore down the Falcons defense. Unbelievable turn of events in that game.

Two things that defined this game - the end of the first half beginning of second half where the Atlanta offense hadn't been on the field for over 1 hour. The drive where The Patricia scored their field goal - that was a very long drive that really started the demise of the Atlanta Defense. The 'CATCH' by Eddelman... holy friggin cow. That was the nail that closed the lid... the rest of the game was the lid (and Atlanta's fate) being sealed.

GOD I HATE THE PATRICIAS!!!!!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjo101
How does the NFL defend the rule that, in OT, if a team scores a TD in the first possession of OT, they win?

Did I get the rule right?
 
How does the NFL defend the rule that, in OT, if a team scores a TD in the first possession of OT, they win?

Did I get the rule right?


Simple, before that rule game into play, the team that scored first, even by field goal, won.

I can see how the college rule is philosophically more equitable. I can also see how the NFL doesn't want overtime to possibly be as long as regulation.
 
Simple, before that rule game into play, the team that scored first, even by field goal, won.

I can see how the college rule is philosophically more equitable. I can also see how the NFL doesn't want overtime to possibly be as long as regulation.
yeah, the coin flip does carry some weight, but it seems like a reasonably good system

not much doubt who the better team was at game end
 
How does the NFL defend the rule that, in OT, if a team scores a TD in the first possession of OT, they win?

Did I get the rule right?

Like the NFL OT much better than college, now that the NFL gives the other team a chance if the team that wins the coin toss only gets a FG on their first possession. In college, you START in FG range. Just seems so artificial. The NFL OT is real football, where the punting game can play a big part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fac and psualt
Like the NFL OT much better than college, now that the NFL gives the other team a chance if the team that wins the coin toss only gets a FG on their first possession. In college, you START in FG range. Just seems so artificial. The NFL OT is real football, where the punting game can play a big part.

REAL football would be to play an entire 1/4... just saying.
 
REAL football would be to play an entire 1/4... just saying.


That's not unreasonable. But if that were the rule, most coaches, who are a conservative lot to begin with, will play not to lose so it's entirely possible that the game goes beyond another quarter. So is it quarter after quarter, or does it go to a sudden death format after one overtime period? The current rule actually forces the coaches to think.
 
Like the NFL OT much better than college, now that the NFL gives the other team a chance if the team that wins the coin toss only gets a FG on their first possession. In college, you START in FG range. Just seems so artificial. The NFL OT is real football, where the punting game can play a big part.
I am completely opposite on this. I love the college OT setup and wish the NFL would adopt this but move back the starting point from the 25 to either 30 or 35 (since NFL kickers are better than most CFB kickers). This way each team has a chance to win (or lose) the game based on decisions on their possession. As exhausted as the Falcon defense was yesterday, the second the coin toss came up heads you knew the game was over. Atlanta offense didn't get a chance to redeem their second half performance in overtime which sucks.
 
That's not unreasonable. But if that were the rule, most coaches, who are a conservative lot to begin with, will play not to lose so it's entirely possible that the game goes beyond another quarter. So is it quarter after quarter, or does it go to a sudden death format after one overtime period? The current rule actually forces the coaches to think.
I am sure you know the rule but, in the regular season the game ends when one team scores a TD or both teams get the ball on O and out score the other team, but you can still have a tie (as they did this year AZ? v ?? and several years ago when I froze my ass Eagles V Cinny when Donnie didn't know the rules), if no one scores in OT. In the playoffs, the rule is, they play to they have a winner.
 
Last edited:
I am completely opposite on this. I love the college OT setup and wish the NFL would adopt this but move back the starting point from the 25 to either 30 or 35 (since NFL kickers are better than most CFB kickers). This way each team has a chance to win (or lose) the game based on decisions on their possession. As exhausted as the Falcon defense was yesterday, the second the coin toss came up heads you knew the game was over. Atlanta offense didn't get a chance to redeem their second half performance in overtime which sucks.

I get what you're saying and can see your perspective, even if I disagree with it. I would say though that IMHO Atlanta's offense didn't deserve a chance to redeem itself in OT. They had plenty of time during regulation to put that game out of reach, including their next to last possession. Just don't take a silly sack and don't commit a holding penalty and they're at least kicking a FG to put the game away.
 
REAL football would be to play an entire 1/4... just saying.

that would feel closer to real FB. also, i would not flip a coin to start, but instead give the ball to the team who had the fewest minutes of possession in 4th qtr.
 
Two things that defined this game - the end of the first half beginning of second half where the Atlanta offense hadn't been on the field for over 1 hour. The drive where The Patricia scored their field goal - that was a very long drive that really started the demise of the Atlanta Defense. The 'CATCH' by Eddelman... holy friggin cow. That was the nail that closed the lid... the rest of the game was the lid (and Atlanta's fate) being sealed.

GOD I HATE THE PATRICIAS!!!!!!!!

two long drives by NE defined the way things turned out. the one that involved 4 penalties with 3 being 3rd and long def holding that kept drive going. the other was the long drive that turned into a pick 6. the reality is that these lead to the ATL def being gassed early
 
Two things that defined this game - the end of the first half beginning of second half where the Atlanta offense hadn't been on the field for over 1 hour. The drive where The Patricia scored their field goal - that was a very long drive that really started the demise of the Atlanta Defense. The 'CATCH' by Eddelman... holy friggin cow. That was the nail that closed the lid... the rest of the game was the lid (and Atlanta's fate) being sealed.

GOD I HATE THE PATRICIAS!!!!!!!!
The "CATCH" appeared to have been Julio Jones amazing sideline catch at the 25 that should have produced a winning FG. Atlanta's fate was self induced by calling 2 pass plays in a row resulting in about 30 yards lost and put them out of FG range! When down that close, run the ball and get closer as only 1 more score (of ANY kind), would have sealed the deal.
 
I am completely opposite on this. I love the college OT setup and wish the NFL would adopt this but move back the starting point from the 25 to either 30 or 35 (since NFL kickers are better than most CFB kickers). This way each team has a chance to win (or lose) the game based on decisions on their possession. As exhausted as the Falcon defense was yesterday, the second the coin toss came up heads you knew the game was over. Atlanta offense didn't get a chance to redeem their second half performance in overtime which sucks.
Me too.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT