For me...Swedish Fish & Sour Patch, can't recall eating either in my life, of course my life began more than 72 yrs ago 🙄
For me...Swedish Fish & Sour Patch, can't recall eating either in my life, of course my life began more than 72 yrs ago 🙄
Are Swedish Fish like those gummy worms?
Why is something with the name "Sour" in it considered candy?
Years ago they had grape too. There was also assorted flavors as well.Swedish Fish are like gummy bears but a tad bit tougher/chewier, and in my experience they’re always red/cherry flavor.
Love ‘em.
Why is something with the name "Sour" in it considered candy?
What. Kind. Of. World. Do. We. Live. In?
I voted Reese’s until I realized the topic was to pick the dud candy. I changed my vote just now to Twizzlers —- the closest to a dud in my book out of those options.Surprised so many don't like Reese's
Exactly.It doesnt make sense to me either that Bammer would be ranked ahead of Mitch State even if the QB was better than Tua on full PS7 Hawaiian pizza flu zone. Give Mitch some clout before the return of the one loss sweatervest mafia from Clebeland.
Judging by the literacy skills of the board denizens, I submit the Reese's votes are for best candy.Surprised so many don't like Reese's
Got a Twizzler plant in Lancaster. Fresh licorice is unlike the shelved product. Texture is softer, and less chewy, and more flavor. The plant workers get free product each month, and I have often got it as a thank you .I would have to say Swedish Fish are the only ones not a solid 8/10 or higher 4 me but not an obvious dud- I guess for twizzlers if it's stale stuff sitting in a zombie bunker in Montana that's not the phactory phresh, that's a scenario to factor in as well.