ADVERTISEMENT

The Witness (documentary about Kitty Genovese murder)

throw2oj

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,626
233
1
Lake County, CA
Maybe OT, maybe not, definitely spoilers -

Did anybody else watch this on PBS last night? Pretty interesting story about the 'facts' around this famous case, which was a bit before my time in 1964. The press reported 38 people watched her be murdered and did nothing and that became the story. It led to reforms in 911, whole entire branch of psychology/sociology and a 'Kitty Genovese effect' where bystanders do nothing to stop a crime.

Genovese's younger brother, after 50 years, decides to find out the truth of about the murder for (and the 38 bystanders) for some closure and finds that just about the only thing reported in the story that was true is that she was murdered. They can't even get the bystander number right as some places report it as 37 witnesses and some it's 39. And then he tracks down a few of the surviving ones and finds that most heard screams, but didn't see anything (only 5 people saw enough to testify). One guys yells out the window and stops the initial attack. One guy says he called the police and they hung up on him saying they've already been called. (It's not impossible that was an invented memory to help cope but the interviews are interesting regardless). One woman who only heard the screams is flabbergasted when he tells her she could be one of the 38, and she denies her mother woke up at all and she is also part of it. And finally her neighbor and friend came down to the entrance to the building and held her while she died (this one is most important to her brother who spent all that time thinking she died alone because that's what was reported).

A bizarre counterpoint is when he meets the minister son of the killer who says he's spent his whole life under the impression she was part of the Genovese crime family and he was afraid to meet the brother (he's a wheelchair due to being wounded in Vietnam). He also says he thinks the case's extreme notoriety meant his father spent his life in prison when otherwise he would been released at some point.

I searched Genovese to see if anyone had seen this previously and got a lot results about the Kitty Genovese from TSM, and even a post where ChiTown mentions the aforementioned affect and posted a video that repeats a lot of the reported facts about the case. Just shows how much the initial report had become accepted as truth.

!Warning! At one point they are talking about research that resulted from the incident and some kind of paper mentioning Paterno and Kitty Genovese in the title flashes on screen for a split second. If that's the kind of thing that results in one being irrationally mad probably best to just skip it.

Ebert's review from last year:
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-witness-2016
 
Maybe OT, maybe not, definitely spoilers -

Did anybody else watch this on PBS last night? Pretty interesting story about the 'facts' around this famous case, which was a bit before my time in 1964. The press reported 38 people watched her be murdered and did nothing and that became the story. It led to reforms in 911, whole entire branch of psychology/sociology and a 'Kitty Genovese effect' where bystanders do nothing to stop a crime.

Genovese's younger brother, after 50 years, decides to find out the truth of about the murder for (and the 38 bystanders) for some closure and finds that just about the only thing reported in the story that was true is that she was murdered. They can't even get the bystander number right as some places report it as 37 witnesses and some it's 39. And then he tracks down a few of the surviving ones and finds that most heard screams, but didn't see anything (only 5 people saw enough to testify). One guys yells out the window and stops the initial attack. One guy says he called the police and they hung up on him saying they've already been called. (It's not impossible that was an invented memory to help cope but the interviews are interesting regardless). One woman who only heard the screams is flabbergasted when he tells her she could be one of the 38, and she denies her mother woke up at all and she is also part of it. And finally her neighbor and friend came down to the entrance to the building and held her while she died (this one is most important to her brother who spent all that time thinking she died alone because that's what was reported).

A bizarre counterpoint is when he meets the minister son of the killer who says he's spent his whole life under the impression she was part of the Genovese crime family and he was afraid to meet the brother (he's a wheelchair due to being wounded in Vietnam). He also says he thinks the case's extreme notoriety meant his father spent his life in prison when otherwise he would been released at some point.

I searched Genovese to see if anyone had seen this previously and got a lot results about the Kitty Genovese from TSM, and even a post where ChiTown mentions the aforementioned affect and posted a video that repeats a lot of the reported facts about the case. Just shows how much the initial report had become accepted as truth.

!Warning! At one point they are talking about research that resulted from the incident and some kind of paper mentioning Paterno and Kitty Genovese in the title flashes on screen for a split second. If that's the kind of thing that results in one being irrationally mad probably best to just skip it.

Ebert's review from last year:
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-witness-2016

FYI, I am the one that brought up the similar names way back when and Chi will attest to that. I remembered the Genovese reporting and story from when I was young. The discussion just did not happen to be in this forum. Everyone who discussed it at that time (2012 or 2013) knew there was no relationship between the two K Genoveses, it was simply an odd coincidence.







 
Last edited:
Maybe OT, maybe not, definitely spoilers -

Did anybody else watch this on PBS last night? Pretty interesting story about the 'facts' around this famous case, which was a bit before my time in 1964. The press reported 38 people watched her be murdered and did nothing and that became the story. It led to reforms in 911, whole entire branch of psychology/sociology and a 'Kitty Genovese effect' where bystanders do nothing to stop a crime.

Genovese's younger brother, after 50 years, decides to find out the truth of about the murder for (and the 38 bystanders) for some closure and finds that just about the only thing reported in the story that was true is that she was murdered. They can't even get the bystander number right as some places report it as 37 witnesses and some it's 39. And then he tracks down a few of the surviving ones and finds that most heard screams, but didn't see anything (only 5 people saw enough to testify). One guys yells out the window and stops the initial attack. One guy says he called the police and they hung up on him saying they've already been called. (It's not impossible that was an invented memory to help cope but the interviews are interesting regardless). One woman who only heard the screams is flabbergasted when he tells her she could be one of the 38, and she denies her mother woke up at all and she is also part of it. And finally her neighbor and friend came down to the entrance to the building and held her while she died (this one is most important to her brother who spent all that time thinking she died alone because that's what was reported).

A bizarre counterpoint is when he meets the minister son of the killer who says he's spent his whole life under the impression she was part of the Genovese crime family and he was afraid to meet the brother (he's a wheelchair due to being wounded in Vietnam). He also says he thinks the case's extreme notoriety meant his father spent his life in prison when otherwise he would been released at some point.

I searched Genovese to see if anyone had seen this previously and got a lot results about the Kitty Genovese from TSM, and even a post where ChiTown mentions the aforementioned affect and posted a video that repeats a lot of the reported facts about the case. Just shows how much the initial report had become accepted as truth.

!Warning! At one point they are talking about research that resulted from the incident and some kind of paper mentioning Paterno and Kitty Genovese in the title flashes on screen for a split second. If that's the kind of thing that results in one being irrationally mad probably best to just skip it.

Ebert's review from last year:
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-witness-2016
I caught that last night on PBS as well, right about the time where they flashed the article about Kitty, Paterno, and crime of silence. Right away I googled it to see the article on Huff Post from back 2011. Just to see the context of what was being discussed. Wow ... talk about wild conjecture!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nellie R
I saw it and thought it was well done and interesting. Would definitely recommend the documentary to others. I thought the brother's drive to understand what happened turned into an unhealthy obsession, typified when he hired an actress to reenact the attack - mostly she reenacted the screams. Maybe that was primarily done for the documentary - still seemed a bit ghastly and unnecessary.

What stood out to me was how many reporters, Mike Wallace being one, said they didn't think the initial New York Times story made sense, but that since it was the Times no one wanted to question it so they all reported information that they new was most likely inaccurate. Doesn't seem like much has changed with the media, which makes one wonder how ill informed we all are on many issues.
 
I couldn't bring myself to look it up.
Pretty sad that a "Professor of Law" named Bennett L Gershman* and a "criminal defense lawyer" named Joel Cohen** not only had the cojones to write this tripe, but to "update" it 3 years later.


*Bennett L. Gershman: Professor of Law, Elizabeth Haub Law School, Pace University
Graduated from Princeton University and N.Y.U. Law School. Served as Assistant District Attorney in Manhattan District Attorneys Office and Special Prosecutor in the New York State Anti-Corruption Office. I teach Constitutional Law, Criminal Procedure and Trial Evidence at Elizabeth Haub Law School. I have visited at Cornell and Syracuse Law Schools.

Author of "Prosecutorial Misconduct" (2d edition Thomson-Reuters) and "Criminal Trial Error and Misconduct" (3d ed. Lexis-Nexis).

Lecture and write extensively on Prosecutorial and Judicial Ethics and Misconduct, Constitutional Law, and Criminal Procedure, and trial practice. Testified before Congress and as expert in criminal and civil lawsuits.


Joel Cohen Lawyer
Joel Cohen, of counsel at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP in New York, represents individuals and corporations in white-collar criminal investigations and prosecutions and in internal investigations, regulatory and enforcement matters. Before practicing at Stroock, he was a New York State and then a U.S. Justice Department prosecutor for ten years concentrating on prosecuting public officials and organized crime figures for public corruption offenses. For 28 years, Mr. Cohen has been a regular contributor and now a columnist on criminal law and ethics for the New York Law Journal. He frequently writes and lectures on those subjects. His first book of non-fiction, Blindfolds Off: Judges on How They Decide, which lifts the veil of secrecy surrounding judicial decision-making, was published in August 2014 (ABA Publ.) Mr. Cohen also authored a book of fiction, Truth Be Veiled (Coffeetown Press, 2010), that addresses the criminal lawyer's ethical dilemmas in dealing with truth. He is an Adjunct Professor at Fordham Law School, where he has taught Professional Responsibility and currently teaches a class on “How Judges Decide.” In addition to his law practice and legal writings, Mr. Cohen has also published three works of Biblical fiction, Moses: A Memoir (Paulist Press, 2003); Moses and Jesus: A Conversation (Dorrance Publ., 2006); and David and Bathsheba: Through Nathan's Eyes (Paulist Press, 2007). The opinions expressed in this article are Mr. Cohen's and not necessarily those of the Stroock firm or its lawyers. Dale J. Degenshein, a Stroock colleague, assists in preparing the articles on this blog.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany Ned2
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT