Tired of hearing from b1g turd trolls that Hull's "Leaping PF Penalty" was legit (linked video)

[Bushwood CC]

The following article has videos of the BLATANTLY wrong and bull$hit calls in the PSU - tO$U game all of which "coincidentally" went in tO$U's favor and played a significant role in 17 of their 31 points (go figure). As a matter of fact, the entire premise of the piece is how clearly corrupt the b1g turds officiating was in this game and they included this video as a clearly corrupt call by the b1g turd officiating crew because it is completely made up BS and Hull is not guilty of any penalty on the play (again, go figure). Here is a hotlink to the article and videos:

Penn State Vs. Ohio State: When A Replay Review Isn’t A Replay Review

 

[Victor E. Bell]

Total bullcrap Bush. I don't go to games anymore because I'm tired of stuff like this. It's a joke. It's every time we're in a game with a top opponent. The hoses come out. It's as predictable as nightfall.

 

[Fayette_LION]

The following article has videos of the BLATANTLY wrong and bull$hit calls in the PSU - tO$U game all of which "coincidentally" went in tO$U's favor and played a significant role in 17 of their 31 points (go figure). As a matter of fact, the entire premise of the piece is how clearly corrupt the b1g turds officiating was in this game and they included this video as a clearly corrupt call by the b1g turd officiating crew because it is completely made up BS and Hull is not guilty of any penalty on the play (again, go figure). Here is a hotlink to the article and videos:

Penn State Vs. Ohio State: When A Replay Review Isn’t A Replay Review

email that link to Carolla, he surely will take charge and hold those accountable for their mistakes.......................................................................................................NOT!

 

[Victor E. Bell]

email that link to Carolla, he surely will take charge and hold those accountable for their mistakes.......................................................................................................NOT!

I would not be surprised to see anything from awarding an extra quarter of play for one of our opponents to catch up, to 6 or 7 downs in a series, to waving off a FG we hit down the middle and calling it wide. It's such a joke anymore that it mocks fair competition and I really don't understand why there isn't a larger revolt among people who pay good money to see this crap. It is like a batter hits a fly ball to center that is caught and is awarded 1st base, only it happens again and again and again. The games are a farce. I can pay to see roller derby or WWE or the circus, or the Harlem Globetrotters just as easily.

 

[Bushwood CC]

Before the lame tO$U posters try to claim this is a penalty, here is an excerpt from the NCAA Rules Committee the year it was enacted:

NCAA Changes approved for 2012 season

"The Football Rules Committee raised concern about this type of action and proposed a rule similar to the leaping rule on place kicks that does not allow the receiving team to jump over blockers, unless the player jumps straight up or between two players."

Hull clearly ran up and jumped between the C and LG and was not swallowed by the pack until the pack converged AFTER he jumped (and was in fact pushed from the side). What Hull did is absolutely not a PENALTY under NCAA Rules anywhere expect in the bull$hit, bushleague b1g turd conference.

 

[dawgduice]

This is why we get ZERO chance to beat a team as good as OSU "and" the "Officials". The Officials are good for 10 points to OSU. Look, the problem is they are "kind of human". They make human mistakes AND they knowingly make calls against PSU for a number of reasons. Many are from the inbred Big 10 conference PLUS many just hate PSU and what it truly stands for. Which is doing things the right way which is mostly anti Big 10.
AND, as a former head BB coach in Philadelphia I know first hand when an "official, well maybe more than one has "it in" for you. They always "say" they call the game fairly but sometimes make "human" mistakes.
Guess what? they all will get "even and more" if you complain or make them look wrong.
The fairest system would be for the Power five conferences to rotate their officials every year. In short, ACC would call all Big games as an example. Hell there is more than enough money to do it.

 

[Evan Ceg]

Re last fall's OSU game, yes, they were two terrible calls, the B1G has admitted it, and the truth is that we didn't field a good enough team to overcome the adversity of those two blown first half calls. If we want to win the game, we stop the Buckeyes from our 39-yard line. There are a dozen plays in any close game where if someone had made their block or run a more precise pattern, the play would have gone for a score or a big gain. We didn't win because we weren't quite good enough that night. Barrett and Elliott were better.

 

[Victor E. Bell]

First half calls don't matter.

Well their admission is an inspiration to me, anyway. I'm sure they'll do everything in their power to see that this doesn't happen again.

 

[Bushwood CC]

Re last fall's OSU game, yes, they were two terrible calls, the B1G has admitted it, and the truth is that we didn't field a good enough team to overcome the adversity of those two blown first half calls. If we want to win the game, we stop the Buckeyes from our 39-yard line. There are a dozen plays in any close game where if someone had made their block or run a more precise pattern, the play would have gone for a score or a big gain. We didn't win because we weren't quite good enough that night. Barrett and Elliott were better.

Yea, the b1g turd cheaters playing a huge role in 3 of their 5 scores (17 points had nothing to do with it). LMFAO, tO$U's average drive all day was 5 plays and 18.5 yards and 100% of the obviously wrong calls all went against PSU and helped tO$U score on each of the drives in question -- just mere "coinky dink" don't you know? Again, LMFAO that tO$U needs such help and never has to overcome such clearly corrupt officiating but this proves how awesome they are?!?! You corrupt b1g turd huggers and defenders are too funny, beyond comical.

 

[Evan Ceg]

I was actually looking at my watch, Bushwood, waiting to see how long it would take you to respond. For all the uncertainly in the world, it's comforting to know that you, at least, are entirely predictable.

How come you never talk about the games we've won as a result of bad B1G officiating? Glen Mason can point to two of those himself.

 

[LaJolla Lion]

I watch actually looking at my watch, Bushwood, waiting to see how long it would take you to respond. For all the uncertainly in the world, it's comforting to know that you, at least, are entirely predictable.

How come you never talk about the games we've won as a result of bad B1G officiating? I think Glen Mason can point to two of those himself.

Penn State has never gotten a call and he is a victim.

 

[Westcoast24]

The following article has videos of the BLATANTLY wrong and bull$hit calls in the PSU - tO$U game all of which "coincidentally" went in tO$U's favor and played a significant role in 17 of their 31 points (go figure). As a matter of fact, the entire premise of the piece is how clearly corrupt the b1g turds officiating was in this game and they included this video as a clearly corrupt call by the b1g turd officiating crew because it is completely made up BS and Hull is not guilty of any penalty on the play (again, go figure). Here is a hotlink to the article and videos:

Penn State Vs. Ohio State: When A Replay Review Isn’t A Replay Review

It was a BS call. Not sure exactly what you are trying to accomplish tho with the constant posts about that game. It's not going to change anything now. It sucked but move on. Time to start a new season.

 

[PSU87]

Re last fall's OSU game, yes, they were two terrible calls, the B1G has admitted it, and the truth is that we didn't field a good enough team to overcome the adversity of those two blown first half calls. If we want to win the game, we stop the Buckeyes from our 39-yard line. There are a dozen plays in any close game where if someone had made their block or run a more precise pattern, the play would have gone for a score or a big gain. We didn't win because we weren't quite good enough that night. Barrett and Elliott were better.

I'm sorry, but I'm really, really sick of that rationale. Whether we SHOULD be good enough to overcome those calls is immaterial. It is indisputable that we SHOULD NOT HAVE TO. Why should we have to be good enough to overcome BOTH the other team AND the refs? Why?

That it has happened consistently, over and over and over again is inexcusable.

 

[Evan Ceg]

I'm sorry, but I'm really, really sick of that rationale. Whether we SHOULD be good enough to overcome those calls is immaterial. It is indisputable that we SHOULD NOT HAVE TO. Why should we have to be good enough to overcome BOTH the other team AND the refs? Why?

That it has happened consistently, over and over and over again is inexcusable.

Because there are blown calls in every game, even in the NFL. If you intend to win, you have to overcome your opponent's talent, you have to overcome the weather, you have to overcome fumbles, interceptions, penalties and crowd noise, and you sometimes have to overcome bad official's calls. It's part of the game.

Those were two terrible calls that should not have happened and the B1G needs to address officiating competence. But as to officiating corruption and directed favoritism, I'm not buying it. There's just no way to pull it off.

 

[Victor E. Bell]

Because there are blown calls in every game, even in the NFL. If you intend to win, you have to overcome your opponent's talent, you have to overcome the weather, you have to overcome fumbles, interceptions, penalties and crowd noise, and you sometimes have to overcome bad official's calls. It's part of the game.

Those were two terrible calls that should not have happened and the B1G needs to address officiating competence. But as to officiating corruption and directed favoritism, I'm not buying it. There's just no way to pull it off.

I actually agree with you on this, and as such I advocate any and all manner of scoring at any stage of the game irrespective of the score. Fake a knee and throw a meaningless F.U. touchdown? No problem here. Flea flickers up 37 late in the 4th? Might have to overcome some bad calls. This is the climate, so it's fine with me. Anything goes. No quarter. What does Penn State have to lose? What, we might make somebody mad? We might make an enemy in this conference? Oh no!

 

[Bushwood CC]

I'm sorry, but I'm really, really sick of that rationale. Whether we SHOULD be good enough to overcome those calls is immaterial. It is indisputable that we SHOULD NOT HAVE TO. Why should we have to be good enough to overcome BOTH the other team AND the refs? Why?

That it has happened consistently, over and over and over again is inexcusable.

Not to mention that it was far more than 2 bad calls - you have the Hull call in OT which was complete BS. Many don't remember, but Barrett took a knee at the end of the 1st Half on 4th & 7 in their own territory - his knee hit the ground in between the tO$U 37 and 38 yard line and there was still time on the clock, but the Officials ignored the fact (Clock has to stop as soon as he downs the ball on change of possession). PSU could have lined up and attempted a long FG. On PSU's 3rd Down play in 2OT, DaeSean Hamilton was clearly interfered with but no flag - the tO$U defender literally reached out and grabbed his jersey and pulled on it as he was attempting to make it to ball in endzone.

 

[mn78psu83]

The following article has videos of the BLATANTLY wrong and bull$hit calls in the PSU - tO$U game all of which "coincidentally" went in tO$U's favor and played a significant role in 17 of their 31 points (go figure). As a matter of fact, the entire premise of the piece is how clearly corrupt the b1g turds officiating was in this game and they included this video as a clearly corrupt call by the b1g turd officiating crew because it is completely made up BS and Hull is not guilty of any penalty on the play (again, go figure). Here is a hotlink to the article and videos:

Penn State Vs. Ohio State: When A Replay Review Isn’t A Replay Review

PSU most likely will never in our lifetime get a fair shake from this conference in football.

 

[psufan9808]

Why do some people apologize for the corruption? It's like you people have Stockholm syndrome. Yes, they abused the crap out of us but the two worst game changing calls were in the first half so we have to be better. WTF? Yes, 1st half, as in first series turnover on our end. That doesn't set the tone of a game at all does it? It's not like coaches talk about how important that first drive is to the game or anything. Refs should be able to spot a team 21 points, not just 10 or 17, and the team has to be at least 21 points better than the opponent or there is no legitimacy to video evidence of multiple egregious errors ALL favoring the conference darlings.

 

[PSU_Nut]

The following article has videos of the BLATANTLY wrong and bull$hit calls in the PSU - tO$U game all of which "coincidentally" went in tO$U's favor and played a significant role in 17 of their 31 points (go figure). As a matter of fact, the entire premise of the piece is how clearly corrupt the b1g turds officiating was in this game and they included this video as a clearly corrupt call by the b1g turd officiating crew because it is completely made up BS and Hull is not guilty of any penalty on the play (again, go figure). Here is a hotlink to the article and videos:

Penn State Vs. Ohio State: When A Replay Review Isn’t A Replay Review

Before the lame tO$U posters try to claim this is a penalty, here is an excerpt from the NCAA Rules Committee the year it was enacted:

NCAA Changes approved for 2012 season

"The Football Rules Committee raised concern about this type of action and proposed a rule similar to the leaping rule on place kicks that does not allow the receiving team to jump over blockers, unless the player jumps straight up or between two players."

Hull clearly ran up and jumped between the C and LG and was not swallowed by the pack until the pack converged AFTER he jumped (and was in fact pushed from the side). What Hull did is absolutely not a PENALTY under NCAA Rules anywhere expect in the bull$hit, bushleague b1g turd conference.

RULE 9 / CONDUCT OF PLAYERS AND OTHERS SUBJECT TO THE RULES FR-91
Article 11
b. No defensive player who runs forward from beyond the neutral zone and leaps from beyond the neutral zone in an obvious attempt to block a field goal or try may land on any player(s).

1. It is not a foul if the player was aligned in a stationary position within one yard of the line of scrimmage when the ball was snapped.
   
   
2. It is not a foul if the player leaps from in or behind the neutral zone.
   
   
3. It is not a foul if an offensive player initiates contact against the player who leaps.

That is was clearly hull did. You can't just take a quote from a rule interpretation regarding punt blocks with out knowing the rest of the rules. Hull was lined up out side of the neutral zone jumped forward and landed on players. Pretty text book to me. Of course I don't expect you to admit that the official were correct and it not a conspiracy.

 

[CDLionFL]

Still whining about this almost 10 months after the fact? Classic. Yeah, it sucked when it happened, especially with how the game shook out. And it has sucked that it seems to have been a constant throughout the 21 years in this conference. But until everyone realizes that the Big Ten is full of incompetence across the board in their officiating ranks and that calls and games like this could very well happen (and almost expect it to happen), then this long-term whining will continue.

I'd have to check but I'm pretty sure that Minnesota fans have stopped complaining about the fumble in the 1995 game that was missed.

 

[osulmb]

bushwood acts like every single call in every game PSU loses goes against PSU. PSUs first TD was a gift TD. Ohio States right tackle moved before the snap. Refs blew it. Play should have been blown dead. No gift TD for PSU. Watch it bushwood. Then late in game PSU got a gift by calling a bogus roughing the passer on Doran Grant. Who was simply tackling Hackenberg. He was in the air. Was he supposed to stop flight. PSU gets gift FG.
PSU was allowed to try and stop Ohio State from driving for its first TD but could not. The game went to OT thanks to bad calls in favor of PSU. But Ohio State was better and won it in 2 OTs
How many times is bush going to keep watching looking for alleged bad calls. How about addressing the ones that went for PSU. They happened.

Also the whole game plan and play calling would have been different if the refs did not blow the calls for and against Ohio State and Penn State. It is wrong to think everything stays the same with those calls adjusted. Coaches call plays according to game situations and down and distance and score. It was a close game a good game. Penn State played tough. Ohio State won.
We shall see what happens in Columbus in a few months.

 

[chrisrn1965]

bushwood acts like every single call in every game PSU loses goes against PSU. PSUs first TD was a gift TD. Ohio States right tackle moved before the snap. Refs blew it. Play should have been blown dead. No gift TD for PSU. Watch it bushwood. Then late in game PSU got a gift by calling a bogus roughing the passer on Doran Grant. Who was simply tackling Hackenberg. He was in the air. Was he supposed to stop flight. PSU gets gift FG.
PSU was allowed to try and stop Ohio State from driving for its first TD but could not. The game went to OT thanks to bad calls in favor of PSU. But Ohio State was better and won it in 2 OTs
How many times is bush going to keep watching looking for alleged bad calls. How about addressing the ones that went for PSU. They happened.

You have got a lot of nerve complaining about calls in that game. You should just be thankful that you won with the help of two blatantly bad calls and move along.

 

[chrisrn1965]

Because there are blown calls in every game, even in the NFL. If you intend to win, you have to overcome your opponent's talent, you have to overcome the weather, you have to overcome fumbles, interceptions, penalties and crowd noise, and you sometimes have to overcome bad official's calls. It's part of the game.

Those were two terrible calls that should not have happened and the B1G needs to address officiating competence. But as to officiating corruption and directed favoritism, I'm not buying it. There's just no way to pull it off.

I don't buy the whole "well you just have to overcome bad calls". There needs to be better accountability for incompetent officiating. When will this conference clean up its act?

 

[Option Bob]

I've written about this topic before, but I want to respond to some of the comments. It seems as if sports fans are willing to accept corruption on the part of Presidents, Congressmen, judges, investigators, attorneys, auto mechanics, CEOs, BOT, religious clerics, policemen, plumbers, teachers -- but NOT college football officials. Why?

Some claim that PSU fans should accept the fate of the numerous biased calls because the Lions have benefitted -- TWCE in 20+ years, mind you -- with game-changing calls. One was 1997 vs Minny on a fumble by McQ. JoePa even apologized to the Gophers for it. Then, lo and behold, it happened again in 2000-something on a pass interference that was close enough for a call or a non-call. Do those 2 calls "even out" the bizarre, rule-bemding, never-seen-before blatant bias calls against PSU in games vs Michigan and Ohio State from 1993-2014?

Really? Gosh, maybe one can bring up 1982 Nebraska next.

The calls against PSU include totally ridiculous things like these:
1. calling time out for OSU and for Michigan when such calls help them -- and the head coach either couldn't or didn't call time out himself
2. 15-yard penalty for "spiking the ball in anger" ??????
3. calling a ball that went backwards on a QB sack that was returned for a TD an incomple pass ... to save Michigan
4. the Hartsock bounced "catch"
5. the bounced ball that a Michigan defender picked up off the ground and returned for a TD -- ruled as an interception and Touchdown on the field by the refs ... actually overturned by the booth when the machine worked correctly
6. an actual blocked punt (even the "thud" was picked up on TV) ruled "roughing the kicker" vs UM
7. the countless ball spots that either denied PSU or gave UM a first down, even when it required a zig-zag walk to place the ball

I'll stop here for my own sanity. But how can any football fan without a preconceived agenda equate those types of calls to a questionable PI call vs Minnesota?

 

[Victor E. Bell]

No worries Option Robert! We will get all these calls back against Buffalo, SDSU, and Army. There are three teams for which I do feel some sympathy. They are playing the PSU role and we will be playing the OSU role in those games. Instead of 28-7 some of those games may go 42-7.

 

[N&B4PSU]

The following article has videos of the BLATANTLY wrong and bull$hit calls in the PSU - tO$U game all of which "coincidentally" went in tO$U's favor and played a significant role in 17 of their 31 points (go figure). As a matter of fact, the entire premise of the piece is how clearly corrupt the b1g turds officiating was in this game and they included this video as a clearly corrupt call by the b1g turd officiating crew because it is completely made up BS and Hull is not guilty of any penalty on the play (again, go figure). Here is a hotlink to the article and videos:

Penn State Vs. Ohio State: When A Replay Review Isn’t A Replay Review

Are some of the people responding in this thread actually penn state fans (sure sound like bot trolls -- those who want us to lose -- to me)? have they actually been with this program since we entered the big bunch of crap? anyone who has watched this joke of a conference do everything in its power to screw us when we play LEGIT powers and thinks it's some kind of normal occurrence should just toss their pink panties into the bin and frolic with the enemy. good fing riddance to ll of 'em..

When you play at this level you expect a call here and there... it happens, no doubt, and yeah, you play on. but in most cases, they do even out. except... they do NOT even out when we play the maizyblue or tosu... yeah, we get one here and there, but in the main... we're hosed. the coaches know it, the players know, and the league knows it. unless we are simply so much better on a given saturday, they will find a way to make sure we fall. when the teams are evenly matched, the team getting the breaks will likely prevail. all the witvoet's need to do is open the door.

and in just about every game i've watched, we do not get those calls... tosu and meatwagon get them. they expect them and they take advantage of a demoralized bunch of kids who know that for the gazillionth time, they got b'fd by the big bunch of crap.

anyone who has followed this program knows it.

 

[Bushwood CC]

RULE 9 / CONDUCT OF PLAYERS AND OTHERS SUBJECT TO THE RULES FR-91
Article 11
b. No defensive player who runs forward from beyond the neutral zone and leaps from beyond the neutral zone in an obvious attempt to block a field goal or try may land on any player(s).

1. It is not a foul if the player was aligned in a stationary position within one yard of the line of scrimmage when the ball was snapped.
   
   
2. It is not a foul if the player leaps from in or behind the neutral zone.
   
   
3. It is not a foul if an offensive player initiates contact against the player who leaps.

That is was clearly hull did. You can't just take a quote from a rule interpretation regarding punt blocks with out knowing the rest of the rules. Hull was lined up out side of the neutral zone jumped forward and landed on players. Pretty text book to me. Of course I don't expect you to admit that the official were correct and it not a conspiracy.

No jackass, quite the opposite is clear - what is clear is that you have reading deficiency. Both point #2 and #3 would make what Hull did "not a foul" as what he did qualifies under both exceptions which begin with the words "It is not a foul if..." and what Hull did qualifies under both exception 2 & 3. Yet again, the only thing clear is that you are a posing troll with your "PSU_Nut" bullsheet and a big Turd conference hugging a-hole who ignores what is plainly written in the rule under two separate exceptions (e.g., Hull not only jumped from in or behind the neutral zone, but he jumped in the gap between the C & LG AND ONLY went sideways AFTER the LG initiated contact into Hull's right side after he jumped!).

 

[ralpieE]

Because there are blown calls in every game, even in the NFL. If you intend to win, you have to overcome your opponent's talent, you have to overcome the weather, you have to overcome fumbles, interceptions, penalties and crowd noise, and you sometimes have to overcome bad official's calls. It's part of the game.

Those were two terrible calls that should not have happened and the B1G needs to address officiating competence. But as to officiating corruption and directed favoritism, I'm not buying it. There's just no way to pull it off.

Patently dumb.

 

[kybuckeye2]

It must be terrible to wake up every day thinking that the world/NCAA/Big Ten/etc. is out to get you. And only you. Maybe some counseling would be helpful.

 

[LionFan96]

bushwood acts like every single call in every game PSU loses goes against PSU. PSUs first TD was a gift TD. Ohio States right tackle moved before the snap. Refs blew it. Play should have been blown dead. No gift TD for PSU. Watch it bushwood. Then late in game PSU got a gift by calling a bogus roughing the passer on Doran Grant. Who was simply tackling Hackenberg. He was in the air. Was he supposed to stop flight. PSU gets gift FG.
PSU was allowed to try and stop Ohio State from driving for its first TD but could not. The game went to OT thanks to bad calls in favor of PSU. But Ohio State was better and won it in 2 OTs
How many times is bush going to keep watching looking for alleged bad calls. How about addressing the ones that went for PSU. They happened.

Also the whole game plan and play calling would have been different if the refs did not blow the calls for and against Ohio State and Penn State. It is wrong to think everything stays the same with those calls adjusted. Coaches call plays according to game situations and down and distance and score. It was a close game a good game. Penn State played tough. Ohio State won.
We shall see what happens in Columbus in a few months.

Looks like someone needs their meds increased. Only an extremely delusional person would argue that the officials blew blatant calls in Ohio State's favor, considering the B1G itself has come out and stated the opposite and that, specifically due to the blown calls that went against Penn State, they are implementing changes.

 

[PSU_Nut]

No jackass, quite the opposite is clear - what is clear is that you have reading deficiency. Both point #2 and #3 would make what Hull did "not a foul" as what he did qualifies under both exceptions which begin with the words "It is not a foul if..." and what Hull did qualifies under both exception 2 & 3. Yet again, the only thing clear is that you are a posing troll with your "PSU_Nut" bullsheet and a big Turd conference hugging a-hole who ignores what is plainly written in the rule under two separate exceptions (e.g., Hull not only jumped from in or behind the neutral zone, butt he jumped in the gap between the C & LG AND ONLY went sideways AFTER the LG initiated contact into Hull's right side after he jumped!).

He jumped from in front of the neutral zone. The three yard line started the neutral zone. Behind the neutral zone is the offensive back field. He actually made contact with his own player.

 

[Bushwood CC]

He jumped from in front of the neutral zone. The three yard line started the neutral zone. Behind the neutral zone is the offensive back field. He actually made contact with his own player.

Wrong again dip$hit, take a look at the video again - he runs forward, plants his left foot and jumps off his left foot....and the front of his left foot is right on the Conversion Hash Mark. You are also full of it that it his teammate who pushes into his right side - it is very clearly tO$U's LG who fires out to his right in between Hull and the DL to Hull's right such that his (e.g., the tO$U LG's) left shoulder drives into the chest of the PSU DL and his right shoulder drives into Hull. You are full of $hit that this is a penalty and the Rule you cited clearly says what Hull did is NOT A PENALTY.....let alone your absurd b1g turd creating interpretations where this is a "clear penalty" because if that were a penalty, there would be a flag thrown on every single Place Kick attempt (e.g., FG or EP attempt) ever attempted -- weird how no flags were thrown on any of the numerous Place Kick attempts in this game (and there were 9 of them prior to this BS call). Absurd to claim this is a penalty as the NCAA Rule is written and that is precisely what you are - the "Theater of the absurd for rationalizing and excusing b1g turd cheating". Yea, you've got everybody fooled with your "PSU_Nut" BS monicker - a complete sham and BS which is very fitting given your love of the b1g turd BS and sham conference.

 

[PSU_Nut]

Hull is clearly in the air prior to the line. Secondly that left guard is an amazing athlete to be able to reach around Barnes and make contact with Hull. The center head is down and hull is making contact with Barnes.

I could easily see how it was called. It was a close call but to think it evidence of a conspiracy is bunk.

 

[Bushwood CC]

Hull is clearly in the air prior to the line. Secondly that left guard is an amazing athlete to be able to reach around Barnes and make contact with Hull. The center head is down and hull is making contact with Barnes.

I could easily see how it was called. It was a close call but to think it evidence of a conspiracy is bunk.

It's a clearly BS call - the Conversion Hash Mark is directly below Hull's foot which is barely off the ground and where his foot was a nano-second before this shot, and this is your evidence that Hull's left foot didn't launch from directly below him??? BTW dip$hit, you can't see that the LG is CLEARLY DRIVING TO HIS RIGHT TOWARDS THE CENTER (his left is bearing no weight and 100% of his weight is on his right foot and pushing straight to his RIGHT). IOW, you jackass, he's doing exactly what I said he was doing - Hull jumped from the Neutral Zone INTO THE GAP BETWEEN tO$U's LG AND CENTER. tO$U's LG drove to his RIGHT (e.g., toward tO$U's CENTER) contacting Barnes and filling the GAP that Hull LEGALLY jumped into! When tO$U's LG shifted to his RIGHT (which he is CLEARLY DOING IN THE PICTURE YOU POSTED ABOVE) he closed the GAP that existed PRIOR TO HIM SHIFTING and in the process he made contact with Barnes and Hull as he SHIFTED TO HIS RIGHT pushing Barnes to his right and ultimately Hull who was in midair to HIS RIGHT! Hull getting pushed in midair by a shifting LG when he CLEARLY jumped from the neural zone into the C/LG Gap is NOT A PENALTY UNDER THE NCAA RULE AS WRITTEN, let alone the "clear penalty" bull$hit you originally claimed in defense of the clearly bull$hit and biased b1g turd officiating. The only things that are "clear", is that it is CLEARLY NOT A PENALTY AS THE NCAA RULE CLEARLY STATES AND IS CLEARLY A B1G TURD BULL$HIT CALL SELECTIVELY MADE UPON PSU TO BENEFIT tO$U - those are the only things that are clear regarding the video, the call and the rule a$$hole.

 

[Fox Chapel Lion II]

I would not be surprised to see anything from awarding an extra quarter of play for one of our opponents to catch up, to 6 or 7 downs in a series, to waving off a FG we hit down the middle and calling it wide. It's such a joke anymore that it mocks fair competition and I really don't understand why there isn't a larger revolt among people who pay good money to see this crap. It is like a batter hits a fly ball to center that is caught and is awarded 1st base, only it happens again and again and again. The games are a farce. I can pay to see roller derby or WWE or the circus, or the Harlem Globetrotters just as easily.

Are you suggesting that Roller Derby is not on the up and up? I find that hard to believe. Miss Behavin' wants to have a word with you, skippy.

 

[osulmb]

Looks like someone needs their meds increased. Only an extremely delusional person would argue that the officials blew blatant calls in Ohio State's favor, considering the B1G itself has come out and stated the opposite and that, specifically due to the blown calls that went against Penn State, they are implementing changes.

Fact is the refs blew both calls which gave PSU a gift TD on the pick six. Suppose JT instead threw a TD pass when the right tackle moved before the snap. Ya think you all would be complaining about that? Of course. The roughing the passer call was a joke and wrong call. That led to PSU FG.
PSU played a good game. Ohio State got the job done and won it in 2 OTs.

People bring up the Hartsock call but fail to mention Toles got away with interfering with him. The announcers even said Hartsock was wearing a Toles costume. That play was only 3rd down anyhow and Ohio State was driving and scored a TD
The key question in this vast conspiracy for Big Ten refs and Big Ten to keep PSU down is why? Why on earth would there be such a thing as only PSU in all of college football is intentionally being screwed? Refs blew calls last year both ways. It does not matter if one is what you call blatant or not. A blown call is a blown call. PSUs td pick six was blown call. Missed the false start. Play dead.

There is no legitimate answer because the whole idea is so bizarre and only in a vocal segment of PSU fans heads.

 

[BobPSU92]

You have got a lot of nerve complaining about calls in that game. You should just be thankful that you won with the help of two blatantly bad calls and move along.

I don't want to hear from a Tosu athletic supporter when his team was not called for holding once during the 2014 conference season. Not once.

 

[kybuckeye2]

Fact is the refs blew both calls which gave PSU a gift TD on the pick six. Suppose JT instead threw a TD pass when the right tackle moved before the snap. Ya think you all would be complaining about that? Of course. The roughing the passer call was a joke and wrong call. That led to PSU FG.
PSU played a good game. Ohio State got the job done and won it in 2 OTs.

People bring up the Hartsock call but fail to mention Toles got away with interfering with him. The announcers even said Hartsock was wearing a Toles costume. That play was only 3rd down anyhow and Ohio State was driving and scored a TD
The key question in this vast conspiracy for Big Ten refs and Big Ten to keep PSU down is why? Why on earth would there be such a thing as only PSU in all of college football is intentionally being screwed? Refs blew calls last year both ways. It does not matter if one is what you call blatant or not. A blown call is a blown call. PSUs td pick six was blown call. Missed the false start. Play dead.

There is no legitimate answer because the whole idea is so bizarre and only in a vocal segment of PSU fans heads.

This ^^^

 

[Bushwood CC]

Fact is the refs blew both calls which gave PSU a gift TD on the pick six. Suppose JT instead threw a TD pass when the right tackle moved before the snap. Ya think you all would be complaining about that? Of course. The roughing the passer call was a joke and wrong call. That led to PSU FG.
PSU played a good game. Ohio State got the job done and won it in 2 OTs.

People bring up the Hartsock call but fail to mention Toles got away with interfering with him. The announcers even said Hartsock was wearing a Toles costume. That play was only 3rd down anyhow and Ohio State was driving and scored a TD
The key question in this vast conspiracy for Big Ten refs and Big Ten to keep PSU down is why? Why on earth would there be such a thing as only PSU in all of college football is intentionally being screwed? Refs blew calls last year both ways. It does not matter if one is what you call blatant or not. A blown call is a blown call. PSUs td pick six was blown call. Missed the false start. Play dead.

There is no legitimate answer because the whole idea is so bizarre and only in a vocal segment of PSU fans heads.

What laughable horse$hit - funny how there are tons of articles, including the one linked in OP, written by unbiased parties that graphically illustrate that the calls were beyond "blown" and were not even close calls, they were just BLATANTLY WRONG CALLS all in favor of one team and contributed massively to 3 of that teams 5 scoring drives. Now according to absurd b1g turd conference loving tO$U moron, a play that NOBODY HAS IDENTIFIED as a "clearly blown call" is blown because homer tO$U guy says so??? You freaks really are a bunch of low-class "win-regardless-of-,means", douche-bags, simply unreal.

Ummm, no, nobody outside the crass, lowlife, homerville $hithole known as "a-hi-a" and the "traditional b1g turd region" believes that the calls you have unilaterally decided to label as "blown" were "blown" you slack-jawed dolt.

 

[Chris92]

Hey, osulmb. Do you have a link on the roughing call against Hack? I don't believe there was a replay on TV.