Why do you permit clearly political threads from those with your same politics for long periods on this board until it is clear that those posters are wrong on the issue but then you are very quick to move threads to the test board that are simply about world events if those world events undermine your political party's positions?
What I posted OT this morning was about a world event with very serious consequences to all Americans. It was purely factual. It was attacked by your posters sharing your political beliefs because acknowledging those facts are detrimental to their political party's politics. But the thread was not political. It did not say political party this or that. It was a debate about the facts of the world event which do impact all Americans.
Each cycle that this repeats of board monitoring with political bias simply tells posters that the board monitor and his political pals on the board are unable to defend their positions with facts and logic. I would argue that you would be more successful in representing your political beliefs by not conceding that your political beliefs do not stand up to debate and scrutiny. I would further argue that balanced board monitoring would be better for the site in the long term particularly as it applies to membership and advertising money. Just a few thoughts.
What I posted OT this morning was about a world event with very serious consequences to all Americans. It was purely factual. It was attacked by your posters sharing your political beliefs because acknowledging those facts are detrimental to their political party's politics. But the thread was not political. It did not say political party this or that. It was a debate about the facts of the world event which do impact all Americans.
Each cycle that this repeats of board monitoring with political bias simply tells posters that the board monitor and his political pals on the board are unable to defend their positions with facts and logic. I would argue that you would be more successful in representing your political beliefs by not conceding that your political beliefs do not stand up to debate and scrutiny. I would further argue that balanced board monitoring would be better for the site in the long term particularly as it applies to membership and advertising money. Just a few thoughts.
